Not exact matches
No, we're not talking
about the right - wing American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) efforts to push radically conservative corporative legislation through state legislative
bodies (such as ALEC re
climate change) but Alec Baldwin.
Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone, President of NAS, explained on the Royal Society's website that the NAS and RS are two of the world's leading scientific
bodies, and, therefore, had «a responsibility to evaluate and explain what is
known about climate change, at least the physical side of it, to concerned citizens, educators, decision makers and leaders, and to advance public dialogue
about how to respond to the threats of
climate change.»
If Andrew Neil
knew more
about the science he might understand 1) how biased a perspective his chosen lines of questioning sometimes give on AGW, 2) that the IPCC's (AR4) suggested range for
climate sensitivity is in line with the large
body of evidence on the subject, and 2) how out on a limb scientists such as Judith Curry and Roy Spencer are from the mainstream evidence - based consensus.
You are clinging to a belief that you
know more
about climate science than the members of every major scientific
body in the world.
And so say virtually the other
climate scientivists, whose conspicuous looking the other way tells us all we need to
know about the integrity of that
body of «science».