Bynum does not claim to know exactly what earlier understandings of
bodily resurrection say to us, but she intuits that they tell us something if we have ears to hear and eyes to see.
Not exact matches
1 Peter 3:18 — during the crucifixion when Christ died — Jesus died in the flesh, but his deity was alive «alive in the spirit» (a Spirit can not die, therefore when a verse
says «raise from the dead» it can only refer to a
bodily resurrection)
Unless one can accept,
say, the doctrines of the Virgin Birth, the
bodily Resurrection of Jesus, and the Trinity, then one can not be a Christian believer.
That is why I
said that of course I did not maintain that one can not be an intelligent Christian and continue to believe in a
bodily resurrection.
It leads me (some would
say, compels me) to believe a string of truths regularly denied in circles which reject or reduce the Scripture principle: the reality of Satan; the existence of angels; the
bodily resurrection and sacrificial atonement of Christ; the historical fall into sin; the deity as well as humanity of our Lord; the certainty of his coming again; and the dreadful judgment of the wicked.
You
say there will be a «
bodily resurrection»?
The reply given by the Johannine Jesus appears at first to confirm this by
saying, «If a man has faith in me, even though he die, he shall come to life», but then proceeds to add quite a new interpretation of the
resurrection power of Christ in the words, «and no one who is alive and has faith shall ever die».13 C. H. Dodd concludes that «the «
resurrection» of which Jesus has spoken is something which may take place before
bodily death, and has for its result the possession of eternal life here and now... The evangelist agrees with popular Christianity that the believer will enter into eternal life at the general
resurrection, but for him this is a truth of less importance than the fact that the believer already enjoys eternal life and the former is a consequence of the latter.»
But is «
bodily resurrection'the only valid view of what it means to
say that Jesus is risen?
The writer of this book returns repeatedly to the subject of the future life, but for him Sheol has vanished,
bodily resurrection has become both incredible and undesirable, and the Messianic age has so lost its dramatic staging and its vivid importance that the most explicit reference to the idea simply
says that the righteous
The
bodily resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth is absolutely central to Christian faith, and anyone who denies it or
says it is unimportant has fallen into heresy.
Even more incongruent, 6 percent of these atheists and agnostics also
said that they believed in the
bodily resurrection of the dead.
I was assigned the task of teaching theology, but when I came to the
resurrection, I honestly had to
say at that stage that is was not about an actual event of a
bodily resurrection but a community memory of an unexplained event.