Not exact matches
and everything
counts what you do and what you say... you will see it on that day... it will shown to every one of us... and human will deny that they have done these and then our
body parts will be testifying
against us... O our Lord have mercy on all of us on that day...
Since white blood cells are your
body's first line of defense
against bacteria and flu bugs, having a healthy
count is essential to staving off infection.
300: Rise of an Empire (R for sexuality, nudity, profanity and pervasive violence) High
body -
count sequel, set in 480 BC, finds triumphant King Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) now leading the Persian army
against forces led by Greek General Themistocles (Sullivan Stapleton) in an epic naval showdown over Athens.
The blood sample will also exhibit a low leukocyte
count - leukocytes are white blood cells that defend the
body against invading infectious diseases.
Over the course of the zany journey, our buzz - haired hero confronted the demons of his past, raised his Nazi
body -
count by a couple hundred, and took the fight
against Hitler to space once again.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up
against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to
body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one
count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal
against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up
against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to
body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one
count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal
against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up
against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to
body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one
count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed
against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was remote.
Similarly, in Erdmann v Complaints Inquiry Committee, 2016 ABCA 145 (CanLII), Justices Jack Watson, Bruce McDonald and Frederica Schutz dismissed an appeal of a professional disciplinary
body's decision
against the appellant, where she had been found guilty of three
counts of unprofessional conduct as a chartered accountant and ordered to pay fines and costs.