The two artists encounter each other in their insistence on
the body as both subject and field, and their consideration of time in the experience of looking.
While some take
the body as subject matter, others explore the human body as material, with non-figurative pieces functioning as unconventional self - portraits.
Working in a wide range of media, Marina Abramović is best known for her provocative performance works, employing her own
body as both subject and medium.
It explores the idea of pregnancy as an extreme form of selfhood, examining the tension between the expectant
body as a subject and an object.
Artists in all genres have utilized
the body as a subject matter since the beginning of art - making.
Using her own
body as subject, she began depicting her nudeness on canvas, shifting the perspective from that of an observer to a personal point of view.
Performance and the Body Many artists active in the early 1970s turned to their own
bodies as both subject and medium.
Referencing the «male gaze» — a term coined by feminist film critic Laura Mulvey to describe the way in which women become framed and understood from a male perspective — this exhibition reverses stereotypical gender roles to treat the male
body as the subject of our collective viewing.
This exhibition reveals the parallels between Warhol's personal history — including his struggles with his own physical appearance, such as early signs of balding in 1950s and the gruesome scars following his shooting in 1968 — and the treatment of
the body as a subject in his work.
Both exhibitions take experimental approaches to
the body as their subject.
From his studies at St Martins, he rejected the traditionalist approach to sculpture and opted for a more radical approach to sculpture, using his own
body as the subject of his pieces, and repositioning the plinth as his stage.
As an internationally acclaimed sculptor installation and public works artist, Gormley has expanded critical engagement surrounding
the body as subject, instrument and material.
Why have so many artists chosen to use
the body as both subject and medium?
A pioneer of performance as a visual art form, Abramović has used
her body as both subject and medium of her performances to test her physical, mental, and emotional limits — often pushing beyond them and even risking her life — in a quest for heightened consciousness, transcendence, and self - transformation.
More recently, artists such as Cindy Sherman have used
their bodies as subjects.
, born in Yugoslavia in 1946, uses her own
body as subject, object, and medium.
Using her own
body as subject and point of departure, Searle experiments with the surface of her skin, allowing it to be clad in layers of coloured and aromatic spices, leaving her bodily imprint on drifts of spices on the floor, or staining certain areas of her body with various substances, suggesting trauma, or damage.
Robert Adanto's film explores radical «4th wave» feminist performance through interviews with a new generation of artists who use
their bodies as subject matter.
The human
body as subject matter became increasingly scandalous and provocative in the post-war climate, whether in Hans Bellmer's dark surrealist masterpiece Les Jeux de la Poupée, Allen Jones's typically fetishistic Waitress I, or for the body's new role as a medium of experience, object of analysis, and tool of social protest through performance, seen in the Aktionism of Gunther Brus (Patent Merde).
She told us how people visiting her rarely notice them, but these are among her most treasured works: Woodman used her own
body as subject, often blurred, awkward and contorted in banal domestic interiors.
With
her body as both subject and medium, she tests the relationship between performer and audience, withstanding pain, exhaustion and danger in her quest for emotional, liberating and conscious altering transformation.
From Louise Bourgeois's massive, brown member, Fillette (Sweeter Version)(1968 — 99), a dangling sculpture that seems to rot in real time; to Lynda Benglis's photographic depictions of the ambiguous boundaries between gender / sexuality identification in Secret 3 (1974); to EJ Hauser's gestural shrine and Whitman's brilliance, Big Whitman (2012), each artist has adopted the male
body as their subject, immortalizing them into objects married with sweeping sentiments.
Though works range in size and media, from serious to whimsical, and from realistic to abstract, each artist centers on
the body as subject.
Almost all his work takes the human
body as its subject, with his own body used in many works as the basis for metal casts.
A pioneer of performance as a visual art form, Marina Abramović has used
her body as both subject and medium of her performances to test her physical, mental, and emotional limits — often pushing beyond them and even risking her life — in a quest for heightened consciousness, transcendence, and self - transformation.
Through painting, photography, installation art and performance, the artist uses her own
body as the subject matter to examine and problematise notions of the idealised erotic female subject.
Since 1974, Semmel has focused on
her body as subject, beginning with her «Self - Images» series, in which she radically shifted the perspective of her compositions to capture an enhanced sense of intimacy.
Turning the perspective of her compositions to her own
body as subject, she began painting the nude female figure, shifting the point of view from outside of the canvas as the viewer, to a simultaneous observer and subject.
Lots of other artists were toying with photography in nondocumentary ways — Duane Michals and William Wegman, for example — and many were using their own
bodies as subject matter in photographs, including Ana Mendieta and Bruce Nauman.
Not exact matches
Such withdrawals aren't
subject to review by the compact's governing
bodies, the Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Council and the Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Water Resources Regional
Body,
as long
as the withdrawal consumes less than 5 million gallons daily.
None of the Reporting Persons nor any manager or executive officer of the Reporting Persons, has, during the past five years, (a) been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors), or (b) been a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative
body of competent jurisdiction and
as a result of such proceeding was or is
subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future violations of, or prohibiting, or mandating activities
subject to, Federal or State securities laws or a finding of any violation with respect to such laws.
Much of the effect can likely be explained by researchers unconsciously giving hints or suggestions to their human or animal
subjects, perhaps in something
as subtle
as body language or tone of voice.
As a consequence, marriages are viewed as (short - term) contracts subject to a cost / benefit analysis, children become consumer goods or accessories, family bonds are weakened and our bodies are treated like so many raw materials to be mined and exploited for manufacture and pleasur
As a consequence, marriages are viewed
as (short - term) contracts subject to a cost / benefit analysis, children become consumer goods or accessories, family bonds are weakened and our bodies are treated like so many raw materials to be mined and exploited for manufacture and pleasur
as (short - term) contracts
subject to a cost / benefit analysis, children become consumer goods or accessories, family bonds are weakened and our
bodies are treated like so many raw materials to be mined and exploited for manufacture and pleasure.
In any case, it will be evident by now that the relationship between God and the created order is much more like that between the human mind and the human
body,
as we commonly conceive it, than it is like that between an earthly ruler and his
subjects.
Primary qualities are viewed
as objective, i.e., independent of the knower's frame of reference, while secondary qualities are judged to be subjective, i.e., involving the complicity of the
subject imposing his own peculiar sensory apparatus on the
bodies perceived.
That several books or
bodies of literature of crucial importance for theology appeared in close proximity to one another still impresses me
as coincidental or providential rather than
subject to a single sociological explanation.
In such acts «is the
body's activity
as much the constitutive
subject of what one does asone's act of choice is»?
The self - integration damaged in this way is the unity of the acting person
as conscious
subject and sexually functioning
body.
Illustrations presented male and female
bodies as objects for study, not
as subjects of religious experience.
Ephesians 5:22 - 24 The women to the / their men are being
subject just
as they are being to The Master; (recognizing) that the man is source / head of the woman just
as Christ is the Head of the ekklesia and He is savior of the
body; even
as the ekklesia is being
subject to The Christ, so the women are being
subject to the / their men in all (things).
«We speak on this
subject very cautiously and diffidently,» he writes, «rather by way of discussion than coming to definite conclusions... We suppose that the goodness of God will restore the whole creation to unity in the end... If anyone thinks that matter will be utterly destroyed, it passes my comprehension how all these substances can live and exist without material
bodies, since to live without material substance is the privilege of God alone... Another perhaps may say that in the consummation all matter will be so purified that it may be thought of
as a kind of ethereal substance... But only God knows.»
When such issues are treated only in the opening and closing sections of a course, students tend to look on them
as addenda «tacked on» to the main
body of
subject matter.
In «the household rule» in Ephesians, wives are told to be
subject to their husbands; husbands are told to love their wives
as their own
bodies.
Here too it is true that I not only have my
body in a
subject - object - relationship, but much more, that
as subject I am my
body, a
body that for me is something more and quite other than just a peculiarly intimate bit of the surrounding world (PR 81) with which I am not identified.
My explanation of it is this: the
subject works his emotions up to the breaking point, at the same time resisting their physical manifestations, such
as quickened pulse, etc., and then suddenly lets them have their full sway over his
body.
Bodies and their various organs are the necessary primary receptors of the multifarious influences conveyed by signs qua possibilities, for that is what signs come down to.13 And signs in general have the power to arouse concrete feelings in embodied
subjects; such
as, for instance, the «qualitative feels» in conscious experiences.14
Taken literally, Paul VI's words seem to rule out all possibility of finding any considerable
body of truth outside the church and place in jeopardy the whole
subject of the dialogue, seen
as honest exchange.
Even in dreams,
as Bergson has shown, once and for all so far
as I am concerned, two further realities are involved: some aspects of the
subject's own past experiences (memory) and (sensory awareness) of the
subject's bodily state, in whatever sense it has a
body, and with the last, to some extent, the state of the environment,
as well.
The plurality of entities, the
bodies which are the
subject - matter of the science of physics, he conceived
as derivative from the one res extensa or matter, constituted by the differential locomotion of parts of the one ultimate res extensa.
Every
subject is a
body, and
as such is ambiguous; here ambiguity means that my
body is both myself and the position from which I perceive others, and the
body is also the objective «me» which others perceive.