CALI's goal in creating FLR, the website says, is «to create
a body of court opinions that is accessible to anyone including educators, librarians, students, lawyers and the public.»
Not exact matches
Portugal's Superior Magistrates Council, an oversight
body, said it had taken note
of the «vivid criticism from broad sections
of public
opinion», but added
courts are independent and it could not intervene, even when faced with «archaic, inappropriate or unfortunate» comments by judges.
Although the
court ruled that human genetic material is not patentable — there is «no doubt that naturally occurring DNA and RNA as they exist inside the cells
of the human
body can not be the subject
of a valid patent,» Nicholas wrote in his
opinion — it concluded that the process
of isolating the BRCA1 gene from the human
body required human intervention.
For its part, Pakatan Rakyat has brought a case against the Elections Commission before the High
Court which is currently under review, accusing the elections
body of gross incompetence, however international
opinion has long since accepted the results and moved on, with both the United States and China accepting the result immediately following the poll in early May.
The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial
of cases before a
court or an administrative
body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview
of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions
of governing statutes or other requirements
of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress,
opinions or discussions
of a
court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.
But a ruling by a
body such as the International
Court of Justice (ICJ) would carry much more weight with public
opinion and help pave the way for future legal cases on climate change, he said.
and other one - world liberals who have persistently pressed judicial nominees in recent years to consider the legal
opinions of foreign
courts and other
bodies when deciding cases here at home?
A decision as to whether or not acts attributable to a
body such as a school or college amount to occupation
of premises for VAT purposes is a question
of degree, sensitive to the particular facts, and one in which an appellate
court has to pay considerable respect to the
opinion of the fact - finding
body.
penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme
Court or the Provincial
Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole
of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare
of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public
opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government
body, in relation to an issue
of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form
of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter
of public interest; Purposes
of this Act: 2 The purposes
of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters
of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters
of public interest; d) Discourage the use
of litigation as a means
of unduly limiting expression on matters
of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right
of access to the
courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.
The HRTO has developed a wide and established
body of jurisprudence in its area
of expertise; the Superior
Court, being a generalist court, is wise, in my opinion, to follow its preced
Court, being a generalist
court, is wise, in my opinion, to follow its preced
court, is wise, in my
opinion, to follow its precedents.
Though disdaining Wikipedia, the Lawson
court itself relied on a private internet website as
of 2011, noting it had been «updated June 2010,» for a factual foundation for its legal holding
of a rational basis for the federal statute on animal fighting activities.40 Likewise, in the
body of its
opinion in State v. D.C., 41 the Fifth District cited various websites addressing how HIV can be transmitted.
If the draft legislative act originates from the
Court of Justice, the European Central Bank or the European Investment Bank, the President
of the Council shall forward the
opinion to the institution or
body concerned.
If the draft legislative act originates from the
Court of Justice, the European Central Bank or the European Investment Bank, the President
of the Council shall forward the reasoned
opinion or
opinions to the institution or
body concerned.
Recently, the Council
of State (i.e., the Italian supreme administrative
court and consultative
body) adopted an important advisory
opinion, which allows for improved access to investigational medicines by patients in Italy.
The
Court further explained that although «most lay person have
opinions and theories
of their own as to how the human
body functions, our
courts have decided that, in order to recover compensation, a standard
of expert evidence on the subject is required where the injury is not apparent to the layman.»
He is their master stick - handler, but a pissed off consumer could lay a big
body check on him in the
court of public
opinion prior to launching a
court case against him and his money - grubbing Zookeepers.