Sentences with phrase «bogus data as»

Why is it that the same companies / transnational corporations that are polluting the earth with their imported useless crap products, designed with a limited service use and all the byproducts that go along with, shipped all over the globe before it ends up in the hands of the end user, are also the same ones who get to take a seat at tables like COP15 / 16, and are allowed to pass off bogus data as fact, as pretext for a global carbon tax and trading scheme?

Not exact matches

Officials criticized them as bogus «magicians,» but making data transparent caused residents to demand action

The report drags out retired data from the bogus cat - versus - bird debate — such as the predation numbers from the discredited Wisconsin study — to justify illegally shooting cats.

Population of Cats The most obvious blunder: Citing what seems to be the same data set («the US feline population has tripled over the last four decades») I referred to in my «Spoiler Alert» post, Butler arrives not at 90 million or so, as indicated in the original source [1], or even the bogus 150 million figure the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Tom Will tried to sell last year to the Bird Conservation Alliance.

[Response: We are adding new features to the models all the time as these factors become better understood, but this idea that there is a progressively worse match to the data is bogus.

Scientific predictions are only as good as the science behind them, if you put junk data in you get junk results, hardly scientific at all, it's a bogus belief system that calls itself science and like all such systems it requires ardent blind followers to keep the fires of the faith burning without ever questioning anything no matter how utterly absurd.

«especially those who manipulate the data in transparently bogus ways to claim that warming has halted or even reversed course — have been silent, as one might expect.»

Would you look at the Marcott data — the long downward trend minus the bogus uptick, of course — as evidence that supports your prediction of decades of cooling?

The Marcott et al. hockey stick study published in the journal «Science» has now been debunked as bogus AGW science due to blatant data and statisitical manipulations - the author's own PhD thesis is corraborating audit evidence that charlatan - style science is required to produce hockey stick blade

The need to avoid bogus and useless content, to help readers understand an extraordinarily complicated story is why fake dramatics such as Pearce's sexing up of the Chinese temperature data story are so intolerable.