Sentences with phrase «bogus science as»

LMAO — you're trying to quote bogus science as your back up.

Not exact matches

Because after a century of bogus meritocracy based on crude vertical assessments of an essentially fictional human attribute known as «intelligence,» the science of aptitude testing may be making a comeback.

In the course of his investigative journalism, Gary has uncovered many bogus commonly held nutritional beliefs that began life as the result of bad science.

It's a clever strategy, really: endorsing bogus claims as valid science without having to defend them as such.

I'd say instead that because Crichton has some scientific training, he really has no excuse for passing off bogus arguments as science.

Unfortunately, the fossil fuel industry has tremendous assets available to them which they use to purchase political power, as well as sponsor fake science and bogus «public education» campaigns.

As long as «debate» is still going on, even if it's bogus debate, they can always point to «the science isn't settled, so lets wait»As long as «debate» is still going on, even if it's bogus debate, they can always point to «the science isn't settled, so lets wait»as «debate» is still going on, even if it's bogus debate, they can always point to «the science isn't settled, so lets wait».

It's useful to think of this as an example of Bayesian priors in action — given that 99 % of the criticisms we hear about climate science are bogus or based on deep confusions about what modeling is for, scepticism is an appropriate first response, but because we are actually scientists, not shills, we are happy to correct real errors — sometimes they will matter, and sometimes they won't.

ExxonMobil is responsible for much of this bogus scientific «debate» and the demand for what the deniers cynically refer to as «sound science.»

As for the bogus Climate Science Special Report, this needs to be torn to shreds by a Red Team critique, which should be easy enough.

But standing silently by for forty years watching old folks shiver and poor people die because of bogus science doesn't strike me as especially moral.

Scientific predictions are only as good as the science behind them, if you put junk data in you get junk results, hardly scientific at all, it's a bogus belief system that calls itself science and like all such systems it requires ardent blind followers to keep the fires of the faith burning without ever questioning anything no matter how utterly absurd.

Michael Mann's «hockey stick» graph is bogus There was a Medieval Warm Period, as warm or warmer than today «Climategate» showed that CRU scientists at the University of East Anglia were cooking the books Gore's film has gross exaggerations and has caused great harm — people feel they have been misled The IPCC is mainly politics — little science; rather than calculating confidence levels, the IPCC voted on them!

The video is worth a look: Among the key points Muller makes are: Michael Mann's «hockey stick» graph is bogus There was a Medieval Warm Period, as warm or warmer than today «Climategate» showed that CRU scientists at the University of East Anglia were cooking the books Gore's film has gross exaggerations and has caused great harm — people feel they have been misled The IPCC is mainly politics — little science; rather than calculating confidence levels, the IPCC voted on them!

Because as an amateur it's quite easy to make up some convoluted mixture of bogus theories, mash them together and blog about them in some difficult to follow manner and then claim «Climate Science hasn't caught up».

I forgot to mention that on the «science denial kills» question, while others have already pointed out how laughably bogus the «Global Warming is killing people» claim is, we might also mention that when the globe cools, (and when people don't have access to low cost energy for warmth), the associated crop failures, disease, starvation, and cold related deaths, number in the millions annually as history has amply demonstrated.

The Marcott et al. hockey stick study published in the journal «Science» has now been debunked as bogus AGW science due to blatant data and statisitical manipulations - the author's own PhD thesis is corraborating audit evidence that charlatan - style science is required to produce hockey sticScience» has now been debunked as bogus AGW science due to blatant data and statisitical manipulations - the author's own PhD thesis is corraborating audit evidence that charlatan - style science is required to produce hockey sticscience due to blatant data and statisitical manipulations - the author's own PhD thesis is corraborating audit evidence that charlatan - style science is required to produce hockey sticscience is required to produce hockey stick blade

a) poor people are dying as we debate this because of the bad science, pensioners are shivering in Britain as we speak because of the bogus claims of people like Marcott and his ilk, and

a) poor people are dying as we debate this because of the bad science, pensioners are shivering in Britain as we speak because of the bogus claims of people like Marcott and his ilk, and ############################################### I do nt see marcott cited in any of the decisions to raise fuel prices in the UK.

When a private individual such as Steve McIntyre can show that one of the most influencial paters in climate science is bogus, when FOI requests are routinely ignored or worse, actively undermined.

The deniers, particularly the activist ones, are not interested in the details of science - they win by pretending to and keeping well informed understanding folks busy looking for citations of bogus details, or filling in the context of selected snippets, as in the original CRU «revelations».

In the realm of discussions about science, Simon Singh's triumph over a libel suit brought by the British Chiropractors Association stands out, as does Ben Goldacre's successful # 500,000 defense against Matthias Rath — a vitamin salesman peddling bogus AIDS cures.

The calls for censorship, jail, and even execution of those who disagree with UN models that have already been shown to be wildly inaccurate (or even deliberate frauds) are growing louder as the bogus science crumbles.

And, by rejecting the non-problem of man - made global warming, he began the long and necessary process of waking up the likes of Professor Reif to the fact that the diversion of time, effort, and trillions of dollars away from real environmental problems and towards the bogus but (to MIT) profitable non-problem of supposedly catastrophic global warming is as bad for the planet as it is for true science.