Sentences with phrase «bold emphasis»

Here is Omega Sports» ingredient write - up, which I have no objections to, with bold emphasis mine:

Problem is, he later wrote an article repeating McCarthy's «mile - wide stretch of open water at the North Pole» claim at Grist magazine, emphasizing that particular bit (bold emphasis added here):

In this example, the text on screen includes a phrase with bolded emphasis.

One reference in particular was especially perplexing because it said (3rd paragraph under the «Front Groups» heading, bold emphasis mine),

But the «Boiling Point» narrative reveals a new problem (bold emphasis added here):

(Ibid., p. 216; bold emphasis ours)

On Professor Tour's Website, there's a very revealing article on evolution and creation, in which Tour bluntly states that he does not understand how macroevolution could have happened, from a chemical standpoint (all bold emphases below are mine — VJT):

And furthermore, Trump's statement was connected to the U.N.'s 2005 resolution to create an «International Holocaust Day» which clearly states; bold emphasis is mine:

word piece titled, «The Education of David Stockman» which was incredibly glib on the topic of Reaganomics; bold emphasis is mine:

Note that in addition to the ineffective carbon trading scheme, this is the best response we are likely to ever get from our «free market capitalist system» (bold emphasis is mine):

The following is some information specifically on hookworms, from the Centers for Disease Control (bold emphasis added):

The bold emphasis there is Howey's own.

With respect to the latter point, Hinote writes (bold emphasis added), «All of these channels... are operating under the assumption that travelers book vacation homes in the same way that they book hotels.

As is seen in their June 3, 1999 press release, (bold emphasis mine)

First, he makes the case, for skeptics, that global warming is real (the links are Adler's; bold emphasis is mine):

About 2 / 3rds down the page, he says, (bold emphasis mine)

However, we have this odd Hoggan variation about Gelbspan from an October 2011 discussion with The Green Interview: (bold emphasis mine)

In a 2008 interview similar to the ones I noted in my last blog piece, we are treated to his reason for attending the hearings (10th paragraph, bold emphasis mine):

So, among Gelbspan's other credibility problems that could be found in short order, Dr Singer added the following (full text here, bold emphasis mine) to a supplemental page link within his August 3 - 9, 1997 news roundup:

But he added a significant detail about those letters in his 2004 «Boiling Point» book (bold emphasis mine):

He repeated the story on multiple occasions, mostly in promotional interviews for his 2004 «Boiling Point» book, such as the following example (bold emphasis mine):

Actually it goes back further, but I mention 1992 - ’93 here to drive home another problematic situation, the spot in Kreider's LinkedIn resumé where she says in regard to her work at Ozone Action (bold emphasis mine),

But this Spring 2009 Rollins Magazine interview (her college alma mater's publication) says in its 8th & 9th paragraph (bold emphasis mine),

Well, this story from Environment and Energy News, a trade journal, provides another reason to further doubt the claims made by Excelsior's officials and political supporters (bold emphasis mine):

I couldn't resist placing a comment about Hoggan's enslavement to Gelbspan at the blog (full text here) on 2/25/13, never expecting any kind of response, and certainly never expecting the reply I received from Lancaster (bold emphasis mine),

Lancaster's response was again not what I was expecting (bold emphasis mine):

But over-capitalization is like excessive highlighting or bold emphasis.

If you want to skip it, just read the line with the bold emphasis.

[italics in original; bold emphasis added]

A note to the wise: when adding bold emphasis, it's easy to go overboard.

You can still distinguish sections by using a bold emphasis for the section header.