The emergence of resistant pink
bollworm in India provided the researchers an opportunity to test the hypothesis that insects in the field would evolve resistance to Bt toxin by the same genetic mechanism found previously in the lab.
Not exact matches
Seven years after China's farmers began planting genetically engineered cotton — tailored specifically to resist
bollworm infestation without chemical sprays — they are using just as much pesticide as they did before, researchers reported
in July.
«Perhaps the most compelling evidence that refuges work comes from the pink
bollworm, which evolved resistance rapidly to Bt cotton
in India, but not
in the U.S.,» Tabashnik said.
The
bollworm, commonly found
in Australia, attacks more crops and develops much more resistance to pesticides than the earworm.
«On top of the impact already felt
in South America, recent estimates that 65 per cent of the USA's agricultural output is at risk of being affected by the
bollworm demonstrates that this work has the potential to instigate changes to research priorities that will have direct ramifications for the people of America, through the food on their tables and the clothes on their backs,» Dr Anderson said.
In 2009, researchers in Arizona tested transgenic pink bollworm moths, which threaten cotton field
In 2009, researchers
in Arizona tested transgenic pink bollworm moths, which threaten cotton field
in Arizona tested transgenic pink
bollworm moths, which threaten cotton fields.
Their findings, reported
in the May 19 issue of the journal PLOS ONE, shed light on how the global caterpillar pest called pink
bollworm overcomes biotech cotton, which was designed to make an insect - killing bacterial protein called Bt toxin.
In the U.S., pink bollworm populations have not evolved resistance to Bt toxins in the wil
In the U.S., pink
bollworm populations have not evolved resistance to Bt toxins
in the wil
in the wild.
However, resistant pink
bollworm populations have emerged
in India, which grows the most Bt cotton of any country
in the world.
Scientists from the UA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture worked closely with cotton growers
in Arizona to develop and implement resistance management strategies such as providing «refuges» of standard cotton plants that do not produce Bt proteins and releasing sterile pink
bollworm moths.
Farmers
in the U.S., but not
in India, adopted tactics designed to slow evolution of resistance
in pink
bollworm.
He said that by collaborating with Indian scientists, «we discovered that the same cadherin gene is associated with the resistance
in India, but the mutations are different and much more numerous than the ones we found
in lab - selected pink
bollworm from Arizona.»
As a result, pink
bollworm has been all but eradicated
in the southwestern U.S. Suppression of this pest with Bt cotton is the cornerstone of an integrated pest management program that has allowed Arizona cotton growers to reduce broad spectrum insecticide use by 80 percent, saving them over $ 10 million annually.
«We wanted to see if field - resistant pink
bollworm from India harbored these same changes
in the cadherin gene,» Fabrick said.
The researchers learned that the astonishing diversity of cadherin
in pink
bollworm from India is caused by alternative splicing, a novel mechanism of resistance that allows a single DNA sequence to code for many variants of a protein.
Adding the Bt genes gives the cotton a built -
in pesticide against the cotton
bollworm, a scourge that can decimate crops.
Based on laboratory experiments aimed at determining the molecular mechanisms involved, scientists knew that pink
bollworm could evolve resistance against the Bt toxin, but they had to go all the way to India to observe this happening
in the field.
In addition to Fabrick and Tabashnik, the following authors collaborated on the study: Jeyakumar Ponnuraj from the National Institute of Plant Health Management in Hyderabad, India, who studied pink bollworm resistance as a visiting scholar in Tabashnik's lab; Amar Singh and Raj Tanwar of the National Centre for Integrated Pest Management at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute in New Delhi; and Gopalan Unnithan, Alex Yelich, Xianchun Li and Yves Carrière from the UA Department of Entomolog
In addition to Fabrick and Tabashnik, the following authors collaborated on the study: Jeyakumar Ponnuraj from the National Institute of Plant Health Management
in Hyderabad, India, who studied pink bollworm resistance as a visiting scholar in Tabashnik's lab; Amar Singh and Raj Tanwar of the National Centre for Integrated Pest Management at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute in New Delhi; and Gopalan Unnithan, Alex Yelich, Xianchun Li and Yves Carrière from the UA Department of Entomolog
in Hyderabad, India, who studied pink
bollworm resistance as a visiting scholar
in Tabashnik's lab; Amar Singh and Raj Tanwar of the National Centre for Integrated Pest Management at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute in New Delhi; and Gopalan Unnithan, Alex Yelich, Xianchun Li and Yves Carrière from the UA Department of Entomolog
in Tabashnik's lab; Amar Singh and Raj Tanwar of the National Centre for Integrated Pest Management at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute
in New Delhi; and Gopalan Unnithan, Alex Yelich, Xianchun Li and Yves Carrière from the UA Department of Entomolog
in New Delhi; and Gopalan Unnithan, Alex Yelich, Xianchun Li and Yves Carrière from the UA Department of Entomology.
By sequencing the DNA of resistant pink
bollworm collected from the field
in India — which grows the most Bt cotton of any country
in the world — the team found that the insects produce remarkably diverse disrupted variants of cadherin.
ICIPE is now testing the push - pull method
in rice cultivation, and against the cotton
bollworm, both features that bode good news for millions of Asia's small farmers.
Part of the problem
in bollworms developing resistance to the Bt toxin is over-cultivation of the GM crop,
in the sense of planting too much of it close together and not providing so - called «refuge» space between fields and farms.
This particular study did not examine whether the
bollworms survived because they developed a resistance the toxin or because the toxin present
in the cotton was insufficient to kill them.
Looking at two varieties of Bt cotton
in commercial use, containing both single and double genes intended to be toxin to the
bollworms, the scientists found that the pests were able to survive.
Back
in March of this year, however, Monsanto admitted that pink
bollworms had developed resistance to Bt cotton
in the Indian state of Gujarat,
in plots where the single gene variety (Bollgard I) of the GM crop was planted.
One of the pests, the cotton
bollworm, is widespread
in Africa, Asia and Europe and causes damage to over 100 crops, including corn, cotton, tomato and soybean.