Not exact matches
It was nudging up at 2.96 percent on Tuesday, which also left the gap between U.S. and German 10 - year
benchmark bond yields just off its widest level
in nearly three decades.
As Poloz indicated
in Toronto, if something went terribly wrong tomorrow, he could cut the
benchmark interest rate by a full percentage point before trying something else, such as creating money to purchase
bonds.
(Repeats to additional subscribers) NEW YORK, April 24 (Reuters)- The U.S.
benchmark 10 - year Treasury yield topped 3 percent for the first time
in more than four years on Tuesday, a milestone that reflects the durability of the U.S. economic expansion and stokes the view the three - decade - old bull market
in bonds is numbered.
Bond yields were a little lower, reflecting the divergent paths for
benchmark interest rates
in the U.S. and Canada.
He has implemented a massive stimulus policy by cutting the central bank's
benchmark interest rate to negative, keeping the 10 - year Japanese government
bond yield near 0 percent
in an effort to control the yield curve and stepping up the Bank of Japan's asset purchases.
Germany's
benchmark 10 - year
bond yield was up almost 2 bps at 0.58 percent
in early trade, above a one - week low of 0.56 percent hit on Friday.
History shows when the
benchmark rate for everything
in the economy from corporate
bond yields to mortgage rates moves by this much, this fast, the stock market struggles
in the following months.
Bonds due
in 2018 and won by BofA were «aggressively» priced with a 1.64 percent yield that narrowed Illinois» spread over Municipal Market Data's
benchmark triple - A yield curve to 70 basis points from 100 basis points ahead of the sale, Greg Saulnier, a MMD analyst, said.
Its underlying index selects and weights its
bonds by market value, and this method yields a portfolio that aligns well with our
benchmark in terms of credit tranches and maturity buckets, with the only notable difference being a slightly lower YTM.
Enter the value factor As we noted
in our November Investment Directions,
in periods of rising interest rates and
benchmark bond rates, value has tended to outperform.
His flagship DoubleLine Total Return
Bond Fund (DBLTX) has outperformed its
benchmark by a wide margin
in the last six years.
High - yield
bonds delivered another year of strong performance
in 2017, with the
benchmark Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield 2 % Issuer Capped Index returning 7.2 % as we approached year - end.
In a rising interest rate environment, the risk that investors have in owning all bond mutual funds and / or bond ETFs for their bond allocation is that both vehicles are managed on a relative return basis versus a benchmark inde
In a rising interest rate environment, the risk that investors have
in owning all bond mutual funds and / or bond ETFs for their bond allocation is that both vehicles are managed on a relative return basis versus a benchmark inde
in owning all
bond mutual funds and / or
bond ETFs for their
bond allocation is that both vehicles are managed on a relative return basis versus a
benchmark index.
His flagship DoubleLine Total Return
Bond Fund (DBLTX) has outperformed its
benchmark by a wide margin
in the last five years.
Ten year ago, iShares Core U.S. Aggregate
Bond ETF (AGG) only had about 150
bonds in its portfolio; now it has 6,500
bonds, or two - thirds of the
bonds in its
benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate
Bond Index.
Investors were keeping a close eye on the market for United States Treasury
bonds, one of the most heavily traded markets
in the world and a
benchmark for the rest of the financial system.
Floating - rate * The coupon on a floating - rate corporate
bond changes
in relationship to a predetermined
benchmark, such as the spread above the yield on a six - month Treasury or the price of a commodity.
In terms of performance, the historical correlation between a global green
bond and a global aggregate
benchmark is very strong, more than 90 %.
In the old days of
bond investing, you would pick a
bond fund with a narrowly defined mandate, like «medium - term corporates,» and the
bond manager would spend his life trying to outperform the stated
benchmark.
The government's 10 - year
bonds rose, pushing yields to their lowest level this year, while the
benchmark BUX stock index rallied the most
in six weeks.
They triggered a surge
in benchmark bond yields that spilled over across asset classes and regions.
Currently, the fund's Treasury stake is much lower than what is stuffed
in its
benchmark index, and it owns a lot more American corporate
bonds.
Plenty of actively managed
bond funds have veered away from their
benchmark and taken on more risk
in the pursuit of higher returns.
China's
benchmark 10 - year government
bond yield traded just shy of 4 percent
in early December, up almost 100 basis points over the course of 2017.
As yields have fallen, duration, or rate sensitivity, has risen, meaning that the risk associated with a change
in rates has generally risen for most
bond benchmarks and traditional funds.
In the initial stage, the regulators said Friday, the linkage will only apply to general equity and
bond funds, as well as to certain exchange - traded funds that track
benchmark stock indexes by purchasing the underlying shares.
We believe the jump
in benchmark U.S. Treasury yields after Trump's surprise win, and the accompanying move toward cyclicals and away from
bond - like equities, represent an important regime shift for financial markets and highlight risks to traditional portfolio diversification.
Active
bond fund managers may aim to beat a
benchmark and other
bond funds
in order to be attractive to retail investors.
While not exactly hitting the Federal Reserve's revered 2.0 % annual inflation target, it was apparently close enough to create more jitters
in the
bond market, with the yield on the U.S. Treasury's
benchmark 10 - year note immediately climbing seven basis points to 2.91 %, its highest level
in more than four years.
And that's not only
in the US, that's
in Europe
in particular, certainly
in the UK, and it's difficult I think to have a certainty around it but I think our bias is that
bonds are on the expensive side at the moment and we are generally
in most developed markets running shy of
benchmark duration positions.
The Dow and S&P indexes suffered some of their worst losses of the year last week, and a shocking price move
in the
bond market sent the
benchmark 10 - year Treasury yield below 2 percent, the lowest level
in over a year.
Rather, the increase
in spreads appears to reflect both tightness
in the Commonwealth Government
bond market (where supply remains limited and demand by foreign investors appears to have increased) and upward pressure on swap rates (one
benchmark against which corporate
bonds are priced) as companies have sought to lock
in fixed - rate borrowings due to expected increases
in interest rates.
In his March 2017 paper entitled «Understanding Anomalies», Filip Bekjarovski proposes an approach to asset pricing wherein a representative portfolio of stocks and
bonds is the
benchmark and stock anomalies are a set of investment opportunities that may enhance the
benchmark.
To better understand green
bond performance and valuations
in the secondary market, Morgan Stanley analyzed 121 self - labeled U.S. and European
bonds, focusing on corporate, and government or government - related
benchmark - size securities (at least $ 500 million).
The global
bond market's primary
benchmark, the 10 - year U.S. Treasury yield, recently exceeded 3 % for the first time
in several years.
There is also the prospect of price loss as the Federal Reserve (Fed) has started raising its
benchmark lending rate amid a stronger U.S. economy (a
bond's yield moves
in the opposite direction of its price).
Based on what we're seeing
in the
benchmark 10 - year
bond yield,
bond traders are showing signs of shifting into a more defensive posture.
o Issuance of Euro
Bond and use of some of the proceeds for reprofiling more expensive domestic debt o Creation of
benchmark domestic
bonds through tap -
ins rather than new issuances.
Plenty of actively managed
bond funds have veered away from their
benchmark and taken on more risk
in the pursuit of higher returns.
In recent years, there has been an increase in «Core - Plus» bond portfolios, which are comprised of a «Core» component of IG bonds (usually 70 % or more of the portfolio) along with a «Plus» component, which is used to diversify away from the portfolio's benchmark and hopefully increase the return of the fun
In recent years, there has been an increase
in «Core - Plus» bond portfolios, which are comprised of a «Core» component of IG bonds (usually 70 % or more of the portfolio) along with a «Plus» component, which is used to diversify away from the portfolio's benchmark and hopefully increase the return of the fun
in «Core - Plus»
bond portfolios, which are comprised of a «Core» component of IG
bonds (usually 70 % or more of the portfolio) along with a «Plus» component, which is used to diversify away from the portfolio's
benchmark and hopefully increase the return of the fund.
The
bond's interest rate is tied to a
benchmark interest rate index like the LIBOR, the federal funds rate, or a specific duration U.S. Treasury
bond yield (
in the case of Treasury floating rate notes).
Over the long term, actively managed
bond funds have not outperformed their
benchmarks as evident
in the SPIVA U.S. Scorecard for year - end 2014.
An absolute return strategy is independent of traditional
benchmarks such as the S&P 500 Index or the Barclays U.S. Aggregate
Bond Index, which gives it the freedom to invest
in a wide variety of securities as well as a variety of strategies to hedge specific types of risk.
The Fund (Class I Shares) returned -0.45 %
in April, underperforming its
benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal
Bond Index.
Many
bond mutual funds
in Canada are too expensive — they're almost guaranteed to trail their index
benchmarks.
The unconstrained strategy can be thought of
in two ways: always trying to earn a positive return with high probability (T - bills are the
benchmark, if any), or being willing to accept equity - like volatility while the
bond manager sources obscure
bonds, or takes large interest rate or credit risks.
While active managers beat their respective
benchmark in the short - term
bond category, this was not the case
in the longer - term diversified / aggregate category.
In the fixed income categories, active managers overwhelmingly underperformed their benchmarks: 83.52 % of managers in the Brazil Corporate Bond category and 82.95 % in the Brazil Government Bond category underperformed their respective benchmarks in 201
In the fixed income categories, active managers overwhelmingly underperformed their
benchmarks: 83.52 % of managers
in the Brazil Corporate Bond category and 82.95 % in the Brazil Government Bond category underperformed their respective benchmarks in 201
in the Brazil Corporate
Bond category and 82.95 %
in the Brazil Government Bond category underperformed their respective benchmarks in 201
in the Brazil Government
Bond category underperformed their respective
benchmarks in 201
in 2014.
Bond market veteran Kathleen Gaffney leads an experienced management team in executing a process centered upon «bond picking» both within and outside of the fund's benchmark in a bottom - up, relative value st
Bond market veteran Kathleen Gaffney leads an experienced management team
in executing a process centered upon «
bond picking» both within and outside of the fund's benchmark in a bottom - up, relative value st
bond picking» both within and outside of the fund's
benchmark in a bottom - up, relative value style.
In 2016, 27 Franklin Templeton municipal
bond mutual funds (Advisor Class / Class Z) outpaced their
benchmark.2