Sentences with phrase «book about nothing»

It's sort of a book about nothing, or everything: In search of writing ideas, an author takes a walk with his dog around the neighborhood.

This begins as a smart, savvy book about nothing, really.

Not exact matches

I really know nothing about writing a book, except what I've heard from people who I've interviewed, so this also provided me with an insight into this tricky venture.

It's interesting enough, but it's not a methodology — there's nothing really actionable about the core ideas of this book.

great book, I'd recommend it to anyone who knows nothing about starting up a business!

The book is called «Money» a topic I sometimes know a lot about and sometimes know nothing about.

Any bookstore can also order it if you give them the full title: «Guerrilla Marketing to Heal the World» — there are more than 60 Guerrilla Marketing books that cover other aspects of business and have nothing to do with what we've been talking about.

Any bookstore can also order it if you give them the full title: «Guerrilla Marketing Goes Green» — there are more than 60 Guerrilla Marketing books that cover other aspects of business and have nothing to do with what we've been talking about.

Sure, I love to read books about automation and new ways to segment and target an audience, but if it doesn't lead to a behavior change in that audience, it's all for nothing.

I'd written one book about Wall Street, Liar's Poker, and pretty much assumed I'd never write another, as I further assumed that nothing would ever happen on Wall Street that was as interesting to me as what had happened to me — or, if it did, I'd be the last person anyone on Wall Street would want to tell about it.

We learn a greatdeal about the mentors against whom Kierkegaard rebelled» particularly Heiberg, the Hegelian litterateur, and Mynster, the Danish bishop» but, strangely, we learn almost nothing about the only mentor to whom Kierkegaard dedicated a book: his philosophy professor Poul Martin Møller.

but don't believe NOTHING nobody else says about God because I know God and I know what he said in HIS book, but I have to tell you... 99.99 % of the stuff «religion» claims God said... Is not what he actually said... If you look at what he said.

They do not follow satan in ANY way and we follow the Bible as well as the Book of Mormon, which has nothing about following satan or anything against the will of God.

He said nothing about making a perfect book.

Although Garnett reports that the book will teach you «almost nothing about Rehnquist's tenure as chief justice,» his sharp review provides a fascinating introduction to the man's life and legacy.

The only place where the Bible and science conflict at all is the science of origins (if science it could be called), and that is only an issue if one insists that 1) genesis is absolutely literal; 2) genesis is the whole story and there is nothing more; 3) traditional assumptions about genesis are the only ones and there is no other way to understand the book.

Can say that I believe in every thing that you disbelief of when it comes to the Creator and the Creation of universe, life and guidance, God has given me hearing, seeing, thinking and heart feelings to see and experience signs and small miracles to have faith in him and continue with good deeds I was told of in his Holy Book although am not perfect at that but nothing to lose but contrary to that there are more to gain in life and life after... For those disbelievers they lose their senses by being locked and blocked from such experiences... It is all about souls as verses speak for them selves;

As much as christians spew on about how the mormons are not real christians, they fail to understand that the Book of Mormon still takes on its roots from the same bible they foolishly believe in... nothing like hypocrites to enlighten the mind and prove our point further.

If i was an atheist I would not worry about taking advantage of other people for my own benefit since I would have nothing to loose... Again I don't listen to what religious books say they all have been twisted, but some things are common sense.

First, Newt's spokesman said that Murdoch knew nothing about Gingrich and the book deal.

However, in what is probably the oldest book of the Bible, Job, living in an ancient culture that knew nothing about space or planets, asserted that God hung the earth on nothing (1500 B.C.) or, in other words, the earth free floats in space.

I write about the flood some in my next book, Nothing But the Blood of Jesus.

I don't think that such a way of reading Revelation means that the book says nothing about a future Tribulation and Millennium.

According to the book, the Vatican had knowledge of multiple cases of sexual abuse committed by Maciel decades ago, but church authorities chose to do nothing about it.

He said nothing about believing «in» a book.

Christan beliefs are based on nothing more than a collection of Bronze and Iron Age Middle Eastern mythology, much of it discredited, that was cobbled together into a book called the «Bible» by people we know virtually nothing about, before the Dark Ages.

It's hard to imagine publishing, now, a book about ordinary, everyday children doing what normal, everyday children do, because what children do in our world is not nothing.

And stop reading articles and books written by so - called experts that actually know nothing about our faith.

creationism is far from an adult theory, its a child like story with fantasy elements based on myth and NO science, we always hear about these crazy people trying to outlaw evolution.But has you stated we have billions of years of evidence, thanks for helping us evolutionists out, unfortunately you have none, just a book, no science, no artifacts, no garden of eden, no bones of adam or eve or even the snake for that matter, no ark, no proof of a biblical flood, no proof of a created world by a higher power, no nothing..

The irony is I own several hundred books on religious theology yet you think I know nothing about it or didn't look far enough.

In her 1992 book The God of Thinness, Mary Louise Bringle similarly denounced the Christian diet industry for «feeding off the facile conflation of fat and sin (and forgetting that the traditional teachings of the church condemn consumptive behaviors but say nothing about cosmetic matters of body shape and size).»

Nothing was written about him until 30 - 40 years after he died (if he even existed)... so what makes you so sure or are you simply gullible enough to accept that a book written 2000 years ago is accurate?

The Myth of God Incarnate, like so many books in Christian theology, has almost nothing to say about Jesus» Jewish people.

Correspondence, in the sense specified, is the nature of truth, the meaning of truth; yet the test of truth that we most frequently employ in connection with the past is the test of coherence: historians and archeologists have nothing available to them that is not given in the present — this book, the reliability of which must be evaluated; this artifact, the significance of which must be construed — and coherence is the final test of their theories about the past built up from the givens of the present.

I have written some about it on this website, but the best explanation is found in my two books: «The Atonement of God» and «Nothing but the Blood of Jesus.»

Earnan wow are you getting your information from some hate group website or book that talks nothing but bs about the quran and its true teachings?

This is why there's fail - safes in our Nuclear / Biological weapons systems, keeps those religious nut jobs from trying to bring about the apocalypse with their own twisted beliefs, decry Islam, but the Book of Revelation is nothing to look forward to.

If we engage in the «de-mythologizing» of the Revelation to St. John the Divine, as we must also «de-mythologize» the creation stories in the book Genesis in the Old Testament, we realize that what is being said is that as human existence and the world in which that existence is set has its origin in the circumambient, everlasting, faithful Love that is nothing other than God — we recall Wesley's hymn, quoted a few paragraphs back, that «his nature and his Name is Love», and Dante's great closing line in The Divine Comedy about «the Love that moves the sun and the other stars» — so also the «end» toward which all creaturely existence moves is that very same Love.

Oh, by the way, scientists don't expect ME to pay money in their honor every week so some guy in a staged ceremony can read from a 2,000 year old book, translated dozens of different ways, written by a bunch of folks whom we know virtually nothing about, where the facts and moral lessons are both flawed and contradictory.

Sorry, but if you live your life around a 2000 year old unverifiable book filled with 3000 year old stories, there's nothing «true» about it.

It is interesting that these fundies know nothing about their own books.

How about this... just follow the book for a month, nothing bad comes out of doing so but positives

I have over fifteen commentaries in my study on the Book of Luke which aid me in my sermon prep, and most of them said almost nothing at all about this part of Luke 3.

Moreover, there is nothing about homosexuality in the Book of Acts, in Hebrews, in Revelation, or in the letters attributed to James, Peter, John, and Jude.

In the life of learning nothing is so injurious as the usurpation of the role of the subject of instruction by the medium of instruction, whether the medium be the lecturer on the subject or the book about the subject.

As you can see, nothing about our day would be material for a book or a mini series.

So just think about this... My book, Nothing but the Blood of Jesus, looked at 5 words, and 56 texts (averaging 11 each).

Why has a book about Jesus (Zealot by Reza Aslan) which suggests he was nothing more than a rabble - rouser shot straight to the top of the bestseller charts...

Itâ $ ™ s hot out, and I can think of nothing better to do than sitting on my porch with some friends, overlooking the beautiful Kennebacasis River, smoking my pipe filled with the new Executive Blend tobacco my brother sent me, drinking a fine red wine (preferably Syrah), and talking about the latest books weâ $ ™ ve read, movies weâ $ ™ ve seen, jokes weâ $ ™ ve heard, or thoughts weâ $ ™ ve had.

There's nothing in your «good - book» about that?