She is also a devoted fan of the celebrated British children's author Philip Pullman, and
her book about the religious and ethical dimensions of his award - winning trilogy Killing the Imposter God: Philip Pullman's Spiritual Imagination in His Dark Materials (Jossey - Bass / Wiley) hit the bookshelves in the middle of a major, national controversy about the release of the trilogy's first movie installment.
Naomi Schaefer, a new contributor, is writing
a book about religious higher education in America.
Not exact matches
How
about we throw out Constantine and his pals excluding
books from the Bible that teach how to develop a direct personal relationship with God, rather than submitting to
religious authority?
Back during the (George W.) Bush Administration, I spent (or rather wasted) some time reading
books and articles written by journalists who were suspicious (I hesitate to say paranoid)
about those suspicious and paranoid fringe
religious kooks (theonomists and theocrats) who threatened to take over....
If they're
religious they're praying they won't die and the LAST thing on their mind is wasting their last moments on earth discussing something they've never personally seen, only read
books about or heard lectures upon.
How
about if you actually paid attention to the article it stated that
religious or not he's
books mimicked stories from the bible..
do I need any approval before I practice my religion, do I have to prove my religion before I practice, my holy
book further describe that you must carry a gun in 21st century because there is too much crime in this world, but it doesn't say much
about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking in English which is not my
religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing in line or not, I am so confused what should I do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back in time ask my guru questions
about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.
While the more educated may smirk
about such articles, there is a lot of value in helping people analyze and understand the
book upon which they place their beliefs, especially when it becomes legislation and policy that affects people outside the
religious bubble.
about a
religious matter, all they do is throw an unverified
book in your face and tell you «That's why!»
If i was an atheist I would not worry
about taking advantage of other people for my own benefit since I would have nothing to loose... Again I don't listen to what
religious books say they all have been twisted, but some things are common sense.
just goes to show — a person can be smart enough to invent the calculus and write lucid
books about optics — all the while maintaining delusional
religious beliefs.
It's not a
religious book, and the author uses quite a bit of profanity, but he makes some astute observations
about religion and politics in the United States.
In my
book «
Religious Literacy,» I argued that the United States is one of the most religious countries on Earth, and yet Americans know very little about their own religions and even less about the religions o
Religious Literacy,» I argued that the United States is one of the most
religious countries on Earth, and yet Americans know very little about their own religions and even less about the religions o
religious countries on Earth, and yet Americans know very little
about their own religions and even less
about the religions of others.
Books and articles are still written
about the major contributions of particular
religious figures such as Jonathan Mayhew, the great Boston Puritan preacher, or the overall contributions of each of the particular denominations from the Baptists to the Roman Catholics.
Entitled The Faith of Donald J. Trump: A Spiritual Biography, the
book includes interviews with the Mr Trump and US Vice President Mike Pence
about the president's
religious beliefs and his relationship with evangelicals during the 2016 election.
His latest
book, «Bombing without Moonlight,» is
about the
religious meaning of suicide bombing.
In contrast, Caldecott states in the first line of his preface: «The
book is
about Tolkien's spirituality, by which I mean his
religious awareness and experience, the things he believed
about life and death and ultimate truth» (p xi).
This
book breaks new ground both in Jewish thought and in larger debates
about the philosophical and
religious grounding of political theory.
That distinction is a half - truth at best, and it misses two important points: the widespread reading of such
books not only tells us something important
about the overall
religious temper of our times; it may also give us a clue to one possible theological expression of the future.
I had a chance to speak with Schwartz
about the political and
religious implications of his
book.
In his second
book, he talks
about the politics, binding nature and
religious slavery the VISION places upon both pastor and people in church culture.
The irony is I own several hundred
books on
religious theology yet you think I know nothing
about it or didn't look far enough.
This is why there's fail - safes in our Nuclear / Biological weapons systems, keeps those
religious nut jobs from trying to bring
about the apocalypse with their own twisted beliefs, decry Islam, but the
Book of Revelation is nothing to look forward to.
By the end of the
book, I think your average reader will be brimming with anger toward the
religious right and fired up mostly
about progressive politics.
These statistics, though few and raw, tell us much
about the plot of this
book and of American
religious life and indeed of American life in general.
How
about a candidate that very correctly holds the Consti.tution as the authority of this nation (not any
religious book) because our founding fathers very deliberately separated church from state in order to protect the beliefs of everyone?
In this
book he argued that religion created a conscience which is quick to understand social need, that
religious philanthropy gives charitably but without raising ultimate questions
about the causes of social maladjustment, that religion «unifies individuals, stabilizes societies, creates social imagination and sanctifies social life; but it also perpetuates ancient evils, increases social inertia, creates illusions and preserves superstitions.
Perhaps that's one of the reasons why I loved Rob Bell's
book, What We Talk
About When We Talk
About God — the unabashed science of wonder particularly in quantum physics that he connects to the complexity and even ambiguity of God is so rare in non-academic
religious publishing or thought.
It could have been written
about by William James in his
book about spiritual and
religious experiences or by Carl Jung.
What is clear is that this compelling and provocative
book has much to say to
religious leaders concerned
about the integrity of democracy in America and
about the integrity of the church in its public commitments
Imagine that you pick up an ancient history
book and it tells you
about three men who were put to death around 33 BC for
religious and political crimes.
One of the worst things
about the
religious people is that they think that because science can't give you all the answers immediately that an ancient
book is the obvious fill - in for anything missing.
The single paragraph devoted to Christian Immigrants by Eck in her much - noticed
book A New
Religious America obscures the fact that the new immigration is bringing
about not so much a new diversity among American religions as diversity within America's majority religion.
Review of a
book about American decline in
religious, political and social life.
Bill has numerous questions
about why the Bible might be true and other
religious books not.
Last week I wrote a post
about the inspiration of Scripture and the inspiration of other
religious books which struck a cord with a lot of people.
Some of my friends from Islam get upset when I say I'm offended by their scriptural verses
about killing, enslaving, or force conversion of all the people of the
book (Jews and Christians) & general
religious intolerance displayed.
But first a few facts
about the movement and the type of
religious faith which gave rise to the
book.
There are more picture
books about St. Francis of Assisi than any other
religious figure, including Christ; Francis» love of animals is rich fodder for an artist.
Suddenly, I saw the Bible as NOT a «
religious book» nor a «bunch of rules
about how to please God»... but instead as a
book of PRINCIPLES
about how to live an abundant life.
What is most striking
about these works is not that they are
about religion on TV but that the
books assume specifically
religious forms in their own right.
So you can imagine my delight when I learned that Jason has written a
book about his experience with
religious doubt, which will be published by Zondervan in the summer of 2010.
In this
book, CS Lewis mixes autobiography with the
religious / philosophical history of Western culture, and writes
about it in the form of John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress.
One of the wisest statements
about our present situation of
religious pluralism comes from Herbert Fingarette in his
book The Self in Transformation:
His
book about the atrocities of ISIS, 2015's Defying ISIS, went a long way toward raising national and global awareness of ISIS's direct persecution Christians, Yazidis and other
religious minorities.
In consequence, we can now see that what we have in the New Testament is what I have called throughout this
book «the witness of apostolic faith», while the Old Testament has its particular Christian significance in giving us the background of the event of Jesus Christ in the
religious faith, worship, and teaching
about God's will and way in the world as these were set forth in the Jewish scriptures which then became part of the Christian Bible.
Perhaps the internet is doing all of the above and more: encouraging and unifying small
religious and other movements; further facilitating scientific unification across geographic proximity, if not also creating new scientific theories and concepts; fostering the rise of new forms of spiritual irrationalism such as those discussed in Wendy Kaminer's wild
book, Sleeping with Extra-Terrestrials; focusing the public even more on particular public personas in news, sports and everything else; creating new classes of investors who are willing to publish online just
about anything, regardless of whether or not they agree with it; germinating new technological ideas that are luring capitalists who hold unreasonable expectations of financial bonanzas.
Most history
books, not
religious ones, give evidence
about how down trodden and poor the Israelites were until the later part of the 20th century.
In his 2011
book Charles le Catholique, Gérard Bardy stresses that de Gaulle wanted to avoid being perceived as compromising the republic's commitment to laïcité — the notion that the state should be neutral
about religion and free from
religious influences — so much so that he usually refrained from receiving Communion when attending Mass in any official capacity.
Hey everyone... understand this... the Bible is not a
book about being
religious, and competing with other gods.