Sentences with phrase «book every year because»

The Occasional Readers: These are the people who read just one or two books a year because their friends told them to pick up «that book».

And many have settled into a book a year because they became bestsellers and were forced to slow down.

Not exact matches

Oh, and if our reporting on this subject sounds vaguely familiar, it's because we wrote this awesome book a few years ago that you should still totally buy: «Stocking Up On SIn»

Although the incident comes at the height of the busiest time of the year for cruise bookings, a period known as Wave Season, travel agents weren't bracing for a downturn in business Monday, in part because the incident had yet to get major publicity, said Mike Driscoll of Cruiseweek, an industry newsletter.

My uncle told me to read this book when I was 17 years old because it changed his life.

Many travel agencies and tour operators discourage bookings this time of year because of the disruption, but luckily for its tourism sector, March is typically already low - demand season.

I joined Uber because I love the product — and that love is as strong today as it was when I booked my very first ride six years ago.»

Booking site Hipmunk reported that its reservations for Trump hotels are down nearly 60 percent over this time last year, the Globe said, while a survey of more than 2,000 Americans by travel trend tracking website Skift found 56.9 percent of respondents said they were less likely to stay in a Trump hotel because of his campaign.

Because its books are in the EPUB format, though, Kobo promises they will work on any open platform — your PC, your Mac, your BlackBerry, your iPhone or iPad, any of the dozens of dedicated e-readers that were unveiled at this year's Consumer Electronics Show, or any of the slews of tablet computers that will follow in the iPad's wake.

Within five years, I'd built a booming business and published my own book, all because I used the resources of the public library to learn something new.

Traditional publishing is a slog — find an agent, pitch a book and if it's picked up by a publisher, sign away the rights to your work, then spend years doing edits and waiting for the book to slot into a publishing schedule — and the majority of these people don't score a deal, because most entrepreneurs «aren't in a position to be commercially published,» says Sattersten.

Like, writing a book feels so unproductive, because you're working on it for years and nothing happens.

I'm not sure because I read the book one or two years ago.

The Conservatives are playing up low - cost initiatives such as action on cross-border price differences because they've restricted spending to balance the books by 2015, expected to be an election year, and don't have the cash right now for major tax cuts or lavish program spending.

But the book was an X Factor, because I was going to work for years in Corporate America anyway.

The book The Outsiders by William Thorndike is probably one of the most influential investing books of recent years, in no small part because it was recommended by Warren Buffett in one of his annual letters.

«Adam Smith» probably wouldn't be surprised to know his book is still just as relevant fifty years later because in The Money Game, he references...

For example, I bought Bancinsurance at under 70 % of book value, because I knew it had a combined ratio below 100 in 28 of the last 30 years.

Because of that, our expectation is that seven years from now AIG will have fewer shares outstanding than it has today, and book value per - share will be higher than the numbers in the prior paragraph.

Because the book they worship, that was written a few thousand years ago by men, doesn't allow for that.

Jeff And you know this because it was written in a 2000 year old book.

We are here now with this terrible choice, because for 40 or so years we've not kept the republic, which is why I wrote the book.

If I said Bill Gates gathered up two of every species and put them on a boat, you'd laugh because it is impossible, yet because it is in a 2,000 year old book written by uneducated men, it somehow makes it fact.

And just so you know, the fact that more and more people like you feel the need to speak up with your hatred of all things biblical or Christian, makes people like me very happy because it tells us that the very book, the Bible, that you diss, is absolutely right because it has been warning us for hundreds of years that thoughts like yours will increase.

Mitch Daniels, former governor of Indiana and now president of Purdue University, has been so accused — but not at all credibly — because of some remarks he made a few years ago in an e-mail, while he was governor, about the tired old ideology pedlar Howard Zinn, whose widely used book, A People's History of the United States, Daniels called «disinformation.»

«I went one year, and I will never go again, because this sermon was outrageously anti-abortion,» Ginsburg said in the book «Stars of David: Prominent Jews talk About Being Jewish» by author Abigail Pogrebin.

On want grounds do you justify your belief to, Hindu's, Buda and others... Just because a book that was written 1900 years ago with any proof what so ever in any God.

Imagine if in a few thousand years, some people claiming they're magical show up to Scotland and demand to own the place because the Harry Potter books basically say that's where Hogwarts is.

This is a few hundred years old at best and as pointed out «Because both sides of the fragment have writing on them, King said it could have come out of a book rather than a scroll.»

Speaking as a millennial who still believes, but no longer goes to church because of a book written by men thousands of years ago.

In his book on the experiences of Roman Catholic clergy, The First Five Years of the Priesthood, Hoge claimed that one of the most important findings of his research was that priests left the ministry because they «felt lonely and unappreciated.»

The wake - up call came after I received a gracious, heartfelt email from a reader who said she loved the book because it gave her hope, made her feel less alone, and put into words what she had been feeling for many years.

Meanwhile we have believerfred that has his oh so supernatural god that can change the natural laws of the universe at whim; why because it says so in a 2000 year old book of myths, so there take that.

This was the year I had to throw out 120,000 book - words I had laboured to write because they weren't the right words at all.

Ben... sorry to disappoint you, but I just can't take seriously anything that a person who believes the earth is only 6000 years old because they read it in a book says.

You are right though I'm sure because of things like this article AA will cease to exist... It isn't a Bible... It was a book written by men 76 years ago and its long overdue for some changes.

Just because the bible mentions towns and kings that were in existence 2000 years ago, that does not make the whole book true.

No Prime, what's childish is to continue to deny a group their civil rights because a 1600 year old book of myths says you should.

But let's throw all that science out because some really poor hermits in the desert wrote a book a few thousand years ago.

Doomsdayers aren't hurting Christianity, Mr Jeffres, as much as people like you are; you stole books from the Wichita Falls public library because they were trying to teach the children of gay people that their parents might be normal, loving human beings, and you accompanied it with a media campaign that raised $ 1 million that same year for your church through bigoted, close - minded sermons.

You can't tell people how to live their lives, what to do with their body, and who they can marry, just because of what you read in a 2000 year old book that is unsupported by evidence.

So you think that just because a book written BY PEOPLE around 2k years ago is more credible than research done by people in the last 150 years?

because 150 years later their books are still insanely relevant to our everyday life.

«it's okay because they have a 2K year old book saying it is» = Age of the book is relevant why?

they openly promote h.omophobia and it's okay because they have a 2K year old book saying it is, so we give them a pass on their bigotry and prejudice.

That's because we embrace the Enlightenment and think instead of living according to some 2000 year - old Bronze Age book of mythology.

For Buber's own discussion of the development of his dialogical thinking and the circumstances under which he wrote I and Thou [including his statement that he did not read Rosenzweig and Ebner's books till later because of a two - year period of «spiritual askesis» in which he could do no work on Hasidism nor read any philosophy], see his «Nachwort» to Martin Buber, Die Schriften über das Dialogische Prinzip [Heidelberg: Verlag» Lambert Schneider, 1954].

I liked the book because the principles he shares encapsulate my thinking from the past five years about the kind -LSB-...]

Part of that is because this year, I published 5 books.

Why have you chosen to write a book about Church unity?I came back from holiday last year and I felt God had challenged me to write a book on unity because...