Sentences with phrase «book has questions for»

Each chapter of this book has questions for reflections and key thoughts pertaining to the chapter.

Not exact matches

David Burkus, best - selling author of three books and an award - winning podcaster, has contributed the first four questions on this list from an interesting article he wrote for Harvard Business Review.

For the past two years, I've explored that question in researching my forthcoming book, EQ, Applied.

Technology blogger Gayle Laakmann McDowell served on Google's hiring committee for three years, and she says that Google now prohibits many of the sorts of questions listed on the jacket of Poundstone's book (gems like «How would you weigh your head?»

As for your main question, which I read as «give me the name of the best book or course out there,» I have a two - part answer.

The real estate mogul has cannily understood that despite polling that indicates most Americans see free trade as more of an opportunity than a threat, a large and motivated minority of voters have been yearning for a politician to call into question whether the trade deals we have on the books are good for American workers.

Airbnb has questioned the methodology, noting that the report uses «available for rent» instead of actual booked nights in determining that listings have been removed from the long - term market.

Airbnb questioned the methodology of that study, noting that it used «available for rent» instead of actual booked nights in determining that listings have been removed from the long - term market.

I also evaluated the marketing plans you appear to have in place for your new book launch, which led me to put together a list of questions.»

When I brought up the question of Ayn Rand, Kalanick denied adamantly that he had any particular affinity for the books.

In reading through all of the dozens of survey questions and tables that Keister has included in this book (and I should clarify that, for better or worse, she is simply picking from surveys that have been done by others), there is one that I kept longing to see.

you can ask questions all you want, test it as much as you like but only you can decide to believe.I have studied hell, read my books about, went to different websites and searched the bible, for a Christian to fear hell is not possible.For one Christ himself said he is the only way to the father.So I think the fear of hell comes from guilt or their power freaks.

The book questions David Cameron's slogan «We're all in this together», saying that «rampant consumerism and individualism» and a culture of «every man for themselves» has «dominated» Britain since Margaret Thatcher became Conservative Prime Minister in 1979.

I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word of a god translated by man, my only question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions of converting the world to his worship alone (for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their purpose in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy law» into dust?

With the help of a professor he persisted, and ultimately came to see the book as an incredibly rich source for thinking about questions that had already occurred to him: Why not engage in a life of hedonistic sexual pleasure, as Augustine did, and as everyone around him was currently doing?

I am a Mormon who has actually read the Book of Mormon, and I encourage anyone with doubts or questions to actually read it for themselves and study the churches teachings from primary sources — the scriptures, words of the prophets, the church itself — rather than trusting 3rd party interpretations or claims of understanding Mormonism.

yes much has to be discerned in the book of remembrance, so called OT, for the priest did all go astray from the ways of YHWH, but one must read, pray, and do the righteous ways of YHWH to get His anointment to understand, and call 1-773-874-0325, YHWH Our Righteousness, the Movement, and arm, and Branch of YHWH, prophesied in Jeremiah 23 vs. 1 - 8, and Jeremiah 33 vs. 14 - 21, also as described in Isaiah 59, and Malachi 3 vs.1 - 4, to get any answers to any questions about this book.

The war question thus serves as a proxy for the more fraught question at the heart of her book: Has the restrictive creative atmosphere post-1979 been good for the moving image in Iran?

That's the question I have to ask myself and not only that, I look at what the actual book says and I can see for myself — they missed it.

Finally: I'd like to issue a big thank - you to our friend, Matthew Vines, who not only wrote a great book for discussion, but who has jumped into the comment section several times to respond to your questions and ideas.

With all of this in mind, I'd love for you to try to tackle this question, which was asked of me in an interview for the Inspy Awards: Tell us about a book that epitomizes quality [Christian] faith - driven lit.

That has been done and done well by others (note, for example, this online series by Tim Challies, or the book - length treatment by Craig Blomberg, Can We Still Believe the Bible: An Evangelical Engagement with Contemporary Questions [Brazos, 2014]-RRB-.

Within two years of the death of the Prophet it was compiled in book form and has been the primary source of Islam for almost fourteen centuries, without question and without variant versions.

The great book of nature praises the Creator without words, but its pages have no answers for some fundamental human questions.

On the contentious question of what good news the church has for gay Christians, few books are more sober, plodding, or poignant than Oliver O'Donovan's Church in Crisis.

People who have already distanced themselves from traditional Christian beliefs may well question the need for a book about the end of conventional Christianity, when this seems self - evident.

Throughout the book she takes it for granted that the «old dogmatic literalistic myths» must go, indeed have gone; the only question is what «we» will replace them with.

I was especially intrigued by a video trailer for the book in which Bell asks the very questions I've been asking myself since childhood and the very questions with which so many in my generation wrestle:

It has been easy for Westerners to sidestep the questions the book has raised and to take refuge in matters of freedom of speech, the limits of citizenship and state jurisdiction, due process and the rule of law — a response that involves little cross-cultural awareness.

J. H. Oldham says of it: «I question whether any book has been published in the present century the message of which, if it were understood and heeded, would have such far - reaching consequences for the life of our time.»

I am deeply grateful to my wife Eugenia for her invaluable assistance as critic and editor and to Professor Buber himself, without whose help, encouragement, and patient answering of questions throughout years of correspondence this book could not possibly have achieved its present form.

Near the close of the book, Barr again seems to despair of his subject and calls for works in the «Christian doctrine of the Old Testament,» since «traditional Old Testament theology... has often tried to solve questions which, properly speaking, can not be solved within the horizon of the Hebrew Bible itself and within the boundaries of its resources» (this last is a very valid point).

I'll be at my computer for the rest of the day working on Book # 2, so if you have any writing - related questions, just leave them in the comment section and I'll be available to respond until 11 p.m. Happy writing!

Although there are various articles and books showing what I have called systematic theological concerns, philosophical criteria are used, usually exclusively, when dealing with questions of meaning and truth, criteria which are respectable in the academy.3 Process Christology, for example, usually follows Schleiermacher, and tends as a result to be embarrassed by strong exclusivist claims.

@kendallpeak: Interesting, but I think a better question would be do you think it is morally acceptable to kill someone for $ 100.00 or kill someone because of your interpretation of your holy book?

Scientific laws and constants that govern our earth appear fine - tuned to exactly what's needed for life to exist — even atheist and agnostic scientists have written books that question whether this fine - tuning points to the existence of God.

I was thinking of saying something similar about Brian, but since I have only read a few of Brian's books, and never met him, I didn't know for sure where he stood on absolute truth, or some of the other questions Glenn brought up.

For others, to whom the Bible may be a time - honored but nevertheless largely mysterious book, the question has more significance.

Since my acquaintance of the Guild for Psychological Studies is somewhat recent, I have asked Dr. Howes to write a brief appendix for this book, outlining the Guild's approach in more precise detail and providing several examples of the kinds of questions asked.

Joseph Smith was a snake oil salesmen in my books, besides I'm in the big leagues (Catholic) don't play with the minor league stuff and trust me I've been to almost every religion over my life searching for answers, I have a library of Bibles, Reference Books from all denominations and they all are the same, no one has answers just more questbooks, besides I'm in the big leagues (Catholic) don't play with the minor league stuff and trust me I've been to almost every religion over my life searching for answers, I have a library of Bibles, Reference Books from all denominations and they all are the same, no one has answers just more questBooks from all denominations and they all are the same, no one has answers just more questions.

As for your other questions, no, they are not addressed in the book, but I have addressed them in other writings here on this blog (which I hope to put in a future book), and my answers to those questions are also not the typical answers found in the writings of most Christians.

Best of all, this book closed with several chapters on pertinent theological questions for today, such as how to reconcile the Bible and science, how to understand the violence of God in the Old Testament, and how to make sense of what the Bible teaches about women, homosexuality, and the fate of those who have never heard the gospel.

Thomas Wolfe, whose books contain many insightful references to alcoholism, asks the question, in Of Time and the River, to which alcohol has been the answer for many:

After the Introduction where questions are raised about the theological topic, the book has two main sections: the answers to the questions, and the practical reflections for living out the answers.

If that question now seems quite silly and seems like the last thing that should occur to someone who has just finished the Book of Genesis (the whole thing, not just cherry - picked portions of it), then you pass and you are now qualified to judge Creationism for what it is: bad theology that starts with a deliberate misreading of that bBook of Genesis (the whole thing, not just cherry - picked portions of it), then you pass and you are now qualified to judge Creationism for what it is: bad theology that starts with a deliberate misreading of that bookbook.

All the other habits of composition that Ford attributes to Whitehead rest on the two attributions we have just put into question; for we are told that the insertions of later writings into earlier ones, and the overall arrangements of writings in a given book, are meant to induce readers to disregard passages conveying abandoned doctrines or positions or, if the doctrines and positions are kept in modified form, to reinterpret them in terms of their final or mature formulations.

In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and state.

It isn't possible for me to go into these stories in any detail in such a short time, so I thought, instead of doing that, I would like to devote my time this morning to addressing some of the main questions people have asked me repeatedly over the course of the last two years, when I was working on the book, and after the book had come out.

I chose Jesus for President (Zondervan, 2008) for our book club discussions, not because I agreed with all of the authors» conclusions, but because never before have I so deeply questioned whether or not I really take Jesus seriously.

Both so called Christians and Islam, in fact, all religion has been the cause of many wars and troubles... could it be that there is just One God and one book, just like there is on Father and one set of standards, Hey, I researched religion for 4 years and then found the truth... these were the three questions I asked myself: If there is a God, would he support wars?