If
your book is less of a risk (is successful, is part of a successful series), that's good to state in your pitch in the «additional comments» section.
Not exact matches
(See Good Calories Bad Calories, by Gary Taubes, and Chapter 9
of my
book, Deep Nutrition) The chance
of this woman, who has no other
risk factors for heart disease aside from high LDL cholesterol (a poor predictor by itself), benefitting from Crestor's ability to prevent heart attacks
is less than one in a thousand.
«Mr. Pip,» a lower profile adaptation
of a
less famous
book, doesn't carry the same
risks as «The Lovely Bones» did, but this gimmicky story set during Papua New Guinea's civil war
is similarly overblown, reaching for emotional effect in a fatally hamfisted fashion.
«Getting rid
of school libraries also
risks increasing inequalities and further disadvantaging the most deprived children who
are less likely to have access to
books or computers at home and will have
less access to public libraries since so many
are closing.»
Self - publishing can
be tricky, given that an author
risks less pay and potential to write
books of lesser quality.
Authors like Judith Glynn who took the
risk on an investment
of that size
are still struggling to put their
books in front
of Spanish - speaking readers, largely because
less than half
of the reported Spanish speaking population in the US reads
books in Spanish, according to a post by Publisher's Weekly.
There
's much
less risk involved with POD than if you
were to printing advanced copies
of your
book.
However, there
are significant dangers with the FNI basket, including: (1) 37 % exposure to information technology and 14 % exposure to telecom may put one directly in the line
of fire for a «tele - tech» implosion, (2) A price /
book of 7 and price / earnings
of 45 looks lofty in the best
of circumstances, and (3) Indirectly investing in the China / India boom via the tigers (Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Korea) and the iShares MSCI Australia Fund (EWA) could prove more lucrative with
less risk.
Whether you want to experience
risk directly or live it vicariously, Sukel
's research - grounded
book remains accessible for a general audience who
's interested in the subject
of living a
less staid life.
Yet this kitchen - sink approach does have downsides: The inclusion
of some
books which
are little more than collections
of postcards stretches the definition to the point
of snapping, and,
books that
are merely catalogues
of visual artists» works
are, for the most part, distractions,
risking little and accomplishing
less.
While Mukasey never mentioned John Yoo or anyone else by name, he referred extensively to Harvard Law Prof. Jack Goldsmith and his «indispensable»
book, The Terror Presidency, to argue that, in the aftermath
of Sept. 11, government lawyers
were under pressure to
be less «
risk - averse.»
For example, compared to older mothers, teen mothers display lower levels
of verbal stimulation and involvement, higher levels
of intrusiveness, and maternal speech that
is less varied and complex.47, 48 Mothers with fewer years
of education read to their children
less frequently25, 49 and demonstrate
less sophisticated language and literacy skills themselves, 50 which affects the quantity and quality
of their verbal interactions with their children.2 Parental education, in turn, relates to household income: poverty and persistent poverty
are strongly associated with
less stimulating home environments, 51 and parents living in poverty have children who
are at
risk for cognitive, academic, and social - emotional difficulties.52, 53 Finally, Hispanic and African American mothers
are, on average,
less likely to read to their children than White, non-Hispanic mothers; 54 and Spanish - speaking Hispanic families have fewer children's
books available in the home as compared to their non-Hispanic counterparts.25 These racial and ethnic findings
are likely explained by differences in family resources across groups, as minority status
is often associated with various social - demographic
risks.