Sentences with phrase «book line by line»

For this edit, I work through the book line by line, looking at how it can be developed.

In line editing, the editor looks at your book line by line and analyzes each sentence.

The proofreader's job is to go through the book line by line, looking for typos, grammatical errors and any other inconsistencies.

With line editing, the editor looks at your book line by line and analyzes each sentence.

Line Editors, on the other hand, go through your book line by line.

God is the author of the bible and I find it much harder to take things out of context if we read and study a book line by line and chapter by chapter.

Not exact matches

The bottom line is that Gates gives this book his most enthusiastic endorsement, concluding: «I don't know how Kalanithi found the physical strength to write this book while he was so debilitated by the disease and then potent chemotherapy.

Students have long tended to live on a campus while at university, and continuing this practice reassures parents and kids that they are getting their money's worth, just like people visiting lawyer's offices may be reassured by walls lined with leather - bound law books.

Last fall, Germany - based Lufthansa Group, which includes Lufthansa, Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines and Swiss International Air Lines, began charging a booking fee of 16 euros for any flight not sold directly by the airline.

By booking her workout classes in advance, Dunnahoo - Kirsch is able to combine the commitment she makes with the social pressure from friends she works out with, into a powerful accountability hack for keeping her version of work - life balance in line.

In addition to opening seven locations from Los Angeles to New York City, Kelley wrote The S Factor Book: Strip Workouts for Every Woman, released three DVDs and launched a line of apparel, all bolstered by spots on The Oprah Winfrey Show, The View and 48 Hours.

In the latest Jack Reacher book, The Midnight Line by Lee Child, Reacher is forced to make a decision without having all of the facts.

We know a lot from various kinds of evidence: a) the experience of the real estate sector, where recent studies by Macdonald Realty and Re / Max have confirmed the dominance of foreign buyers at the top end of the market especially, as stated for years by individual realtors (accounts often denigrated as «anecdotal»); b) there is the digging of several investigative journalists, and most notably by Ian Young of the South China Morning Post who has boldly and effectively raised issues native journalists have sometimes shied from; c) academic work, including the books by Katharyne Mitchell (2004) Beyond the Neoliberal Line and David Ley Millionaire Migrants (2011).

The other books in his series that are written by his experts are top of the line.

This is the bottom line of this important tip from a new book by Brian Solis.

It is also playing catch up with Amazon by selling more and more books from self - published authors, both on - line and in its retail outlets.

In our view this should take the form of an equity participation, along the lines set out in the book by Mian and Sufi, House of Debt, (2014), Chapter 12.

I'm sure I'm not using the right wording but it is easy to say something is outdated dogma by only looking at the last line of a book that has been in process for 2,000 years (i.e. 9 times older than the government trying to tell it what to do).

A book, written by greedy patriarchal elite, re-written, edited to fit the cultural norms of the day says so... so why not buy it hook, line, and sinker?

do I need any approval before I practice my religion, do I have to prove my religion before I practice, my holy book further describe that you must carry a gun in 21st century because there is too much crime in this world, but it doesn't say much about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking in English which is not my religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing in line or not, I am so confused what should I do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back in time ask my guru questions about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.

Anyway, he stopped by the hall with Maggie during the book signing and his line was just as long as mine but then again he did have the baby so unfair advantage, right?

He can CLAIM he is a «prophet» operating at the edge, but if your living is made strictly by books, tours and on - line courses within the «emergent empire», you are not a prophet, but rather a «profit».

I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.

Thanks especially to the critical study of Dr. C. Harold Dodd, as summed up in his notable little book The Apostolic Preaching, we have become familiar with the word kerygma, Greek for «the proclamation»; and taught by Dr. Dodd and those who have followed the line of enquiry which he laid down, we have come to see that this kerygma was the very heart of the earliest Christianity.

Whether I am listening to someone teach Scripture, or doing it myself, my preferred style is book by book, verse by verse, line by line.

When we read a letter or book, it is written word by word, line by line, chapter by chapter and when we get to the end, we hope to have the meaning that the author intended us to have.

It is far easier to folow the history and see why your book, your god, and the NT needed to be created, BY MEN... no evidence of divine inspiration... a line showing the previous cultures your story was taken from, and one can see where the wisdom of men was incorporated... just in your version it is not mans wisdom, but something from some deity (who until the NT was a very vindictive, murderous, egotistical god), who suddenly is all love and flowers.

In contrast, Caldecott states in the first line of his preface: «The book is about Tolkien's spirituality, by which I mean his religious awareness and experience, the things he believed about life and death and ultimate truth» (p xi).

Thus Herberg concluded with what became the book's most famous line: «America today may be conceived, as it is indeed conceived by most Americans, as one great community divided into three big sub-communities religiously defined.»

I mention these two books simply because a reader may be interested in a further and more adequate discussion by the same author along the same lines.

Ensure you truly do not miss out by booking on - line.

It is interesting that the group helping build this does nt recognize that the book used by its participants has not one line in the whole book, that speaks of respecting a woman.

Since the published version of the article was condensed by half, I hope it will not be too cheeky to refer Professor Kainz to my forthcoming book, mentioned in the article's bio line, which discusses these matters explicitly.

In a book replete with evaluations and magisterial judgments tossed in as throw - away lines, Till We Have Faces — arguably the most powerful piece of fiction written by Lewis — is mentioned only twice.

This aspect of her book is often downplayed, as when commentators celebrate her literary immortality by citing her prophetic line, «I want to go on living even after my death!»

And if you remember, we learned that His normal style and practice of teaching was to teach through books of Bible line by line.

If god looks at me and puts me in the «eternal hellfire» line just because I don't believe what I'm being fed by a man - made book and self - centered religions, then that is a pretty messed up god you got there.

Most commentaries take a book of the Bible and work through it verse by verse, line by line, and even word by word.

He preached the Word, book by book, line by line, precept upon precept (cf. Isaiah 28:10 - 13).

One time when I was praising this book, Tillich said that every line was discussed with the Kairos Circle, and he concluded by saying, «If I am proud of anything I have written, this is the one.»»

By requiring that the New Testament books contain what the Apostles taught, the Church was not trying to freeze its development to the past, but was making sure that its ongoing life and thought be in line with the past.

Alarmed in 2006 by the hard lines of American political language, Orson Scott Card, an otherwise respected sci - fi novelist, was led to write the dumbest book of his career, Empire.

I've been warned by more people than I can count that if I don't say just the right thing, if I don't toe the party line when it comes to sexuality, I could lose speaking engagements, book deals, readers, even fellowship with other believers.

The bottom line is that no one should live their lives by a crusty old book of fairytales from the bronze age.

Great books and good books are still published and some even turn a profit, but the book business is increasingly prey to the bottom line which is enhanced by the reflections of, and narrations about, celebrities from other media.

They stressed Episcopal Prayer Book worship, the sacraments of the Church, and urged the necessity of ordination only by bishops, who were supposed to stand in line that went back to the apostles.

Christian books and conferences tend to perpetuate the idea that a woman's worth should be measured by the details, rather than the message, of Proverbs 31, and like the magazines in the checkout line, often focus on fitness, domesticity, beauty, and success as ways of earning the favor of God and men.

When I first saw the title of this book I assumed it would be a pamphlet along the lines of those very useful booklets published by the Catholic Truth Society, setting out Catholic doctrine in simple terms for the interested reader without the time or inclination to read more weighty theological works.

Funny how christians will tout a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant sheep herders as the «truth» but introduce something written by the same people in the same era that doesn't fall into line and it's quickly dismissed.

This is the line taken by what in North America today is frequently described as «process thought»; its greatest exponent was the late Professor Alfred North Whitehead in his works Process and Reality (his book has been re-arranged, and provided with excellent explanatory notes by D. W. Sherburne, under the title of Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality), Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thought, Adventures of Ideas, Religion in the Making, and Symbolism, all of them written after Whitehead had joined the faculty of Harvard University in the United States in the 1920's.