Sentences with phrase «book means making»

Fixing book means making them truly diverse.

Publishing a book means making sure you DO have a professionally designed cover.

Publishing a book means making strategic, and sometimes difficult, decisions around format (hardcover vs. paperback), Price (NEVER price a book to recoup your investment, price it to sell), trim size, title and subtitle.

Owning the rights to your book means you make the final decisions about pricing, distribution, cover art, book interior design, and so on, and so on, and so on.

Not exact matches

Roughly half of the 112 online lenders that make business loans are direct lenders, according to Barlow, which means they hold the loans on their own books.

«Limited liability means you can't be financially responsible for more than your investment in the company,» writes Greg McFarlane in his book, Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense.

Tax consequences RMR's Sachs made the mistake of putting the equity deals on the books of a C corporation, which meant she could have faced double taxation down the road.

Books and lectures can help you understand emotional intelligence, but to make improvements — to learn about yourself — means doing.

In his book Love: A History, University College London philosopher Simon May is more skeptical, writing that, similar to Perel's reasoning, love has had to fill the vacuum of meaning - making left in the West with the «retreat of Christianity» from much of public life.

But if working with her makes people want to buy my books, then by all means.

In my book, that makes her a real businessperson, which I mean as high praise.

The distribution of these shares was made in book - entry form, which means that no physical stock certificates were issued.

I am not the most religious of people, but I do believe in God, and Jesus... but many people seem to forget that God's SON sacrificied himself for our sins... in my book, a SON is part of a FAMILY... God put us on this earth to be of free will and to make our own way... Love being the biggest part of that way... we love God and we love Jesus... but we are also all part of his FAMILY... He made us all to be part of a unit that has hope and faith and love... we were meant to procreate... so what does it matter if a person who is dying does not automatically think of God, but of their loved ones?

As a reader trying to be charitable, I face an unattractive choice: accept that His Eminence does hold the mistaken view that mercy is essential to God; or assume that when he emphatically made the multiple important statements at key points in his book that mercy is essential to God, he didn't mean them.

There's no talk in the book of Wade using the fortune to make the world better or «save humanity» — it's a means for him to be super powerful, super rich, and score the girl he met online.

Or how was a man named David, a simple shepherd at one time some 3,000 years ago, able to specify that we are formed by means of a set of detailed instruction within our DNA, that makes each of us unique, saying: «Your (God's) eyes saw even the embryo (up through 56 days after conception) of me, and in your book (the instructions in DNA) all its parts were down in writing, as regards the days when they were formed and there was not yet one (organ) among them»?

I do pray that I will honor God with the opportunity, that my books will be truthful and that they will mean something to people... but to imply that I write out of selfless concern for humanity makes the whole process sound a lot nobler than it is.

The author of the review thinks this book sinks under its own weight, for its author makes no secret of his loathing of the whole homosexual community, quoting every passage in the bible that can even remotely be translated against them, often twisting passages to say what they do not mean.

but your religion and book is man made;; just give your own life meaning for the time ya have — is hawkings point.

Books which give a sense of a new age include Bede Griffiths, A New Vision of Reality (Collins, 1989); Leonard Swidler, The Meaning of Life at the Edge of the Third Millennium (Paulist Press, 1992); Charlene Spretnak, States of Grace (HarperCollins, 1991); Keith Ward, A Vision to Pursue (SCM Press, 1991); and Hans Küng, Theology for the Third Millennium (HarperCollins, 1991), and Global Responsibility, to which reference has already been made.

I put this question out to some of my Rabbis Without Borders colleagues, and in addition to seconding the Bereshit Rabbah idea, they recommended Searching for Meaning in Midrash: Lessons for Everyday Living by Michael Katz and Gershon Schwartz and Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text by Rabbi Burt Visotzky.

The Episcopalians have used the so - odd - volume Prayer Book Studies series as a means of informing clergy and laypeople as to the reasons for changes and of instructing them on how to make the most effective use of the revised liturgies.

If you want to believe in your god, then more power to you, but don't make yourself look stupid by trying to refute scientific fact based on what someone told you or what you've read in an outdated book written to scare and control mankind though fantastical and highly embellished stories meant to inspire fear and obedience to ancient laws and beliefs.

In «Books» he shows the books themselves — the making, the binding, the paper and our handling of them, our attempts to read and understand what is written on the page and what is written between the lines, our desire to decipher the hieroglyphs that books are, our hopes to find the meaning in the sileBooks» he shows the books themselves — the making, the binding, the paper and our handling of them, our attempts to read and understand what is written on the page and what is written between the lines, our desire to decipher the hieroglyphs that books are, our hopes to find the meaning in the silebooks themselves — the making, the binding, the paper and our handling of them, our attempts to read and understand what is written on the page and what is written between the lines, our desire to decipher the hieroglyphs that books are, our hopes to find the meaning in the silebooks are, our hopes to find the meaning in the silences.

What a megalomaniac you are to think that reading some man - made book means that your god exists.

They provide better «toys» (usually BOOKS) in their kids» meals than the other fast food places, have great fries and make a mean salad with non-breaded chicken.

The background assumption of this book means, finally, that so far as its content is concerned the best hope of saying things of general relevance to persons involved in all types of theological schooling today lies in making some particular and fairly concrete proposals that may turn out to be directly pertinent only to a few types of theological schools but may provoke and help other persons in other types of schools to think through these issues for themselves.

The Book of Common Prayer had this meaning in view when it employs, in the course of the Prayer of Consecration in the service of Holy Communion, the words: «Wherefore, O Lord and heavenly Father, according to the institution of thy dearly beloved Son our Savior Jesus Christ, we, thy humble servants, do celebrate and make here, before thy Divine Majesty, with these thy holy gifts, which we now offer unto thee, the memorial thy Son hath commanded us to make; having in remembrance his blessed passion and precious death, his mighty resurrection and glorious ascension; rendering unto thee most hearty thanks for the innumerable benefits procured unto us by the same.»

These books provide an opportunity to explore that common story, to accept the gifts of fundamentalism along with its flaws and to revisit how religious meaning is made.

You mean so she can continue to be confused by all the contradictions and logical fallacies of this supposedly «divinely inspired» book written by people with no concept of simple things like the chlorophyll in plants that make them green?

If you're making a short film, and you want to illustrate a society that's falling into tyranny, you can just cut away to a scene of a pile of books burning, and everyone will know exactly what you meant.

But God is God and He can not lie and since all the books we have in the canon have to be fully inspired because if they were not this would mean God failed in preserving His Word and so we can not have that so we have to just make do with what we have and so we just keep trusting God and making everything fit as best we can.

The reason it is so often a matter of dispute is that people differ in what they mean when they use the word, and since deep emotions are tied in with the conviction that the Bible is inspired, to doubt the kind of inspiration one believes in is apt to seem like rejecting the Bible outright or making it no different from any other book.

In his recent book, Life, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity, he offers «four benefits» of mortality: interest and engagement, suggesting that adding, say, twenty years to the human life span would not proportionately increase the pleasures of life; seriousness and aspiration, proposing that the knowledge that our life is limited is what leads us to take life seriously and passionately; beauty and love, presenting the idea that it is precisely their perishability that makes, for instance, flowers beautiful to us, just as the coming and going of spring makes that season all the more meaningful; and, finally, virtue and moral excellence, by which he means the virtuous and noble deeds that mortality makes possible, including the sacrifice of our own life for a worthy cause.

I mean, if it is so wrong for an atheist to trust his own conscience, why is it so right for Christians to trust so firmly in a man - made book?

Critical thinker, You study a little science and suddenly you feel you have it figured out, Your meaning of life and the after life is based on other men's hypotheses, Yet it makes such good sense to you that you make a life choice based on it, then you stand up and criticize a person whose made a life choice based on A holy Book written 2000 years ago, When it comes down to it how are you any different, Your choices based on science which changes daily and theirs on the prophets.

When you reach the point of trying to change what words mean just to stop from admitting your book makes no sense, you need to let go.

Both the publishers and the author wish to express their thanks to Charles Scribner's Sons, the original publishers of On the Meaning of Christ, and especially to Mr. William Savage, for their co-operation in making the publication of the combined books possible.

Our Prayer Book says it all, yet how many of us have failed to do what the Prayer Book plainly intends — to make this Table and its service, rather than a clerically intended service like Morning Prayer, the chief event of every Sunday, in order that the people of Christ may be incorporated into Him, find there the strength for life, be taught there the meaning of life, and be sent forth to conform life to the pattern there displayed.

«And this is why our holy founder wished the superiors to test their monks somewhat as God tested Abraham, and to put their poverty and their obedience to trial, that by this means they may become acquainted with the degree of their virtue, and gain a chance to make ever farther progress in perfection,... making the one move out of his room when he finds it comfortable and is attached to it; taking away from another a book of which he is fond; or obliging a third to exchange his garment for a worse one.

It does not mean that one lives every day simply as if it were one's last — a kind of crazy living «for the moment» rather than living «in the moment,» to use a distinction made by the dying poet Ted Rosenthal in his book and movie bearing the same title, How Could I Not Be Among You?

I don't mean by selling us their books at a discount or by inviting us to an after party following one of their speaking gigs or by welcoming us to their plush churches or by making it easier for us to adore them or by providing ways for us to get close to them and breathe the same air they do.

God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

It was the Light because the knew creator was of Light but searched for it in the wrong sources, or made an idole of light sources to worship rather than reading and looking in to ones self by reading the light that is within the books that was meant for them to read thing and believe in to submission!.

Total Depravity means that you and I can not possibly read the Bible as a book published for our edification from God... Well if we cant then what made Calvin able?

(Religion in the Making, Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1960, 31) This goal of elucidation is apparent when he says that rational religion's aim is to make it «the central element in a coherent ordering of life... in respect to the elucidation of thought, and in respect to the direction of conduct...» (Religion in the Making, Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1960, 30) Religion's final product is the provision of «a meaning, in terms of value, for our own existence, a meaning which flows from the nature of things.»

The book that made Bonhoeffer a question mark to many minds was Letters and Papers from Prison.1 Those provocative phrases like «religionless Christianity,» «the God who forsakes us,» «Jesus as the man for others,» and similar phrases appear in context that are only in outline form without full contextual meanings.

It means that as many as 20 books were left out from the original collection of works that made up the Bible and that over 10 major translations / interpretations have taken place leading up to the current Revised Standard Version of the King James Bible.

That is what you are trying to do by a book that was written thousands of years ago by various men who gave you their version of the truth, doesn't make it the ABSOLUTE truth and since we can debate it today and show different interpretations means YOU don't know the actual truth anymore than the next guy.