Sentences with phrase «book says law»

Not exact matches

I can't think of any other issue where the laws on the books are inconsistent with the wishes of three - quarters of British Columbians,» said Angus Reid vice-president Mario Canseco at the release of the numbers.

In his 2015 book «Rewriting the Rules of the American Economy,» Stiglitz said that the normalization of shareholder primacy was solidified under the Reagan administration through changes to federal income tax law and securities law, including relaxed antitrust laws.

One unique challenge that the German market presents is the Reinheitsgebot — sometimes called the «German Beer Purity Law» — that has been on the books for centuries and says for a product to be marketed as a beer, it can only use four ingredients: water, yeast, malt and hops.

«No one is pointing to a law on the books saying «it's illegal.»»

«While casinos routinely look for suspicious bets at sports books and have worked with law enforcement to identify illegal activity, in some cases leading to criminal convictions, no such oversight exists for the illegal sports betting market,» he said

«The Elliott book of deals is probably the most instructive, and it's also one of the most far, far reaching,» says Marty Lipton, founding partner of the law firm Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz and inventor of the poison - pill corporate defense strategy, who has lately faced Elliott more frequently and on more fronts than ever before.

«The Congressional Review Act is a pretense for the majority party in Congress to wipe rules off the books without ever talking about the merits the agency had in mind when it made the rule final,» Rena Steinzor, a law professor at the University of Maryland, said in an email.

«United disregarded the books and records and internal accounting controls provisions of the securities laws while casting aside its normal decision process to re-enter one of its hub's poorest performing markets,» Andrew Ceresney, SEC enforcement division director, said in a news release Friday.

Essentially, the law says that Facebook is like a library, not a newspaper — if you go to a library and check out a book on how to build a bomb, the library isn't liable for that.

That is why they have a hard time understanding how others can be moral without their book of laws that say «Do this because God said so».

We have chosen, as a nation, to have a society with secular laws, where said laws must be grounded in reason, not, «You can't do this because I'm superior to you,» or «because my holy book says so.»

He was certainly found guilty of blasphemy and heresy, which is absolutely right, because if what your book says is true then he deserved death, but the only way that would happen is under Roman law, from Pilate.

«HotAirAce Making, or attempting to make, any law because The Babble, or any other Holy Book of Nonsense says that's the way it should be.»

Making, or attempting to make, any law because The Babble, or any other Holy Book of Nonsense says that's the way it should be.

I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word of a god translated by man, my only question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions of converting the world to his worship alone (for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their purpose in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy law» into dust?

In layman's terms, there was no Law to hold man accountable for sin, yet man disbelieved in God, then God said, so to speak, you want to play by the book?

As the book professing to be the Word of God says: «The carnal mind is enmity [hostile] against God: it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be» (Romans 8:7).

Meanwhile we have believerfred that has his oh so supernatural god that can change the natural laws of the universe at whim; why because it says so in a 2000 year old book of myths, so there take that.

He said nothing of a book that would combine the old covenant scriptures with the account of His life on earth and letters that were written to people who lived under the law, that people who have never lived under the law would have to try to discern and apply to their lives until He returned, or they died.

As he said in his 1939 Robbery Under Law, another of his seven travel books: «I believe that man is, by nature, an exile and will never be self - sufficient or complete on this earth.»

It doesn't really matter what some old book says because if we are to actually believe the stories of the Bible then we're going to have to just toss out the laws of physics.

Origen of Alexandria, the first major interpreter of the Bible in the Church's history, said that «the apostle Paul, «teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth,» taught the Church... how it ought to interpret the books of the Law.»

Andrea Yates, the Texas mom who drowned her five children in a bathtub in 2001, believed they «were «stumbling» into the throes of the devil and were going to burn in the fires of eternity,» said Richard Bonnie, a University of Virginia law professor, reading from his criminal law teaching book.

Amanda Spielman, head of the non-ministerial department said new laws and powers to protect children who mostly study religious holy books such as the bible, the Sunday Times reports.

Listen, over and over and over again (don't make me go in and count them — probably 100s of times) your book says the «The «LORD GOD» spoke to Moses and said: «blah blabbity blah», delineating each law that was supposed to be transmitted to the people.

If we apply what Jesus said to this situation then we are compelled to see that laws are already on the books to be followed.

There is at least one section (IV) which deals with contracts — six different kinds — and various kinds of outrages, that is to say it is in some senses a book of law.

They also have a hard time with not endorsing gay marriage and will lie and say that civil unions do nt provide them the same protection which is a lie and some states do in fact have these laws on the books.

Writing in the book Exploring Forgiveness, he says, «Central to the Buddhist - Hindu cosmology is the law of karma.

well, if you knew the law, and knew what that **** g ancient book of BS says about «obeying the law», you would actually be supporting my position....

The Bible is a very antique book, with extreme laws in a society where there was no justice system like nowdays, God never said we should keep doing it like 4000 years ago laws of the hebrews.

I've noticed that many Christians see the Bible as a book that's chock full of easy to follow laws and rules that tell you what to do (Paul said this so we must... they did this so we must...) and proof texts (it says here that Jesus said that who ever is not for him is against him so I forbid you to listen to Britney Spears).

... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.

That's what Christ says over and over again, and the National Sunday law book avoids all these statements.

We should totally keep circu - mcision but i also want the law against slav - ery repealed because my holy book says that is ok as well!

God didn't seem to need them to agree with me in order to speak to them and tell them he loves them, in a way that they know, deep down, that it's true... Later when I met my father in law I became familiar with a saying of his in his book Authority to Heal and it rang true from my experience.

When believers stop saying stupid things in public and stop trying to change laws because of their books - of - stupidity, atheists won't have much to talk about.

But there are still laws on the books today that say we are not allowed to kill, abuse or cause injury to our children.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Before they all had to depend on the high priest, but when this book was finished the people could now read, and do the law for themselves, although still following the priest, this the book was an assurance that all will have no excuse to say that they did not know YHWH, and is what the «new covenant» means.

You probably have a list of scriptures (the same ones I once used) for this purpose, but if you look at them honestly they do not mention the Bible, but rather «the law», writings of «men of old», «the Word of God», «this book», «this prophecy», «the scripture» or other specified or unspecified writing (s)-- NOT ONE says «the Bible» or can be reasonably interpreted to refer to the Protestant or Catholic canon WE moderns mean when we talk about «the Bible».

Cindi, There is also much that has to be discerned about the book of remembrance, the so called OT, and this NT, that I call the (Not True), book, for it does not fulfilled the OT book, it changes the laws of life, as prophesied in Isaiah 24:1 - 5, and YHWH says He changes not in Malachi 3:6, and He also teaches us in this book that He does nothing without His servants the prophets, in Amos 3:7, so that we are not consumed, (lied to).

YHWH is not contrary, the people are; as in Ezekiel 14:14 - 23, no man can die for another man's sin, «We» are all responsible for our own righteousness, and YHWH would not say this then put a man in the NT to die for us to clean up our sins, is a lie on YHWH, for He changes not, this is why He left this book to learn it, and a man laying with another man is not the law of righteousness, nor is lying, stealing, greed, hate, poverty, in difference etc...

People, there is also much that has to be discerned about the book of remembrance, the so called OT, and this NT, that I call the (Not True), book, for it does not fulfilled the OT book, it changes the laws of life, and is why we today have so much confusion of what is right, and of what is wrong, as prophesied in Isaiah 24:1 - 5, and YHWH says, He changes not in Malachi 3:6.

For all of those who are saying that Christianity promotes slavery in any way, I encourage you to step away from the book of Leviticus (or any book in the OT that talks about laws outside of the 10 commandments) and instead, go read the book of Romans... you'll learn a lot more about the true meaning the of the Bible there.

With laws that specifically say in that very book no human will be able to live up to, so a god has to sacrifice himself to himself.

The culmination of the initiation came when Moses took the book of the Law and read it to the people and the people said: «All that the Lord has spoken we will do, and we will be obedient» (Exodus 24:7).

You said, «All confirmed by Hawking reply see: Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, The Grand Design (New York: Bantam Books, 2010), 161 — 62» In your reference, the authors write, «Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing.

Who cares what a 2000 year old book says about it... it is not the way things are today and unless a court of law bans tattooing ones own body, no crime is being committed.

You said that Followers of Jesus are not under the law of Moses... not so... The Book of Revelations says, Blessed are they that do his commandments, (The TEN COMMANDMENTS) that they may have right to the tree of life... and may enter in through the gates into the city.