Sentences with phrase «books about evidence»

, directed against Brunner in 1934, but rather the book about the evidence for God of Anselm of Canterbury which appeared in 1931.

Not exact matches

«There is a lot to like about the book; Chapin has done extensive research and relies on both primary and secondary sources as she provides evidence for her claims.»

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

Who would be interested in a book supporting and trying to gain acceptance for the doctrine based on biblical and historical evidence that Jesus died on March 25, 31 CE, at 15.00 hours, on a TUESDAY and was resurrected by His Father, Yahweh God, at about 18.00 hours, on a FRIDAY, thus fulfilling His own prophecy contained in Mat 12:40, whereas He would be three days and three nights in the tomb?

It's the fact that you keep spewing the same old rhetoric from the same out - dated book and don't care about true evidence.

The prolific Jesuit scholar, Fr James Schall, now in his eighties, has given us this book about the pleasure of knowing the truth of things, in particular the delight of discovering coherence from reflecting upon diverse aspects of existence, of realising that all sorts of «scraps of evidence» point to the fact that only Christianity provides an adequate account of our existence.

There is not a shred of verified evidence for the supernatural beings or events told about in that book.

creationism is far from an adult theory, its a child like story with fantasy elements based on myth and NO science, we always hear about these crazy people trying to outlaw evolution.But has you stated we have billions of years of evidence, thanks for helping us evolutionists out, unfortunately you have none, just a book, no science, no artifacts, no garden of eden, no bones of adam or eve or even the snake for that matter, no ark, no proof of a biblical flood, no proof of a created world by a higher power, no nothing..

For historical evidence of the Bible, just look up in your history books about the Assyrians and Babylonians taking over Israel several hundred years BCE, or that the Romans were in power during the time of Jesus, that they did use crucifixion as a form of execution.

When he was presented with fiftyeight peer - reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not «good enough.»

The internal evidence of the book of Daniel and what he knows and writes about has been shown to be accurate and could not have been known to anyone unless they were living in Babylon at the time of it's empire.

Also outstanding in the trash department have been long articles by David Remnick, who had earlier written a fine book about the collapse of Soviet Communism in which he evidenced great insight and respect for Jews and Judaism.

The concept of having «witnesses» reported in a book is about as good as evidence as the weekly world news is.

The strongest evidence on that point appears on the first page of her book, where «Bill,» a member of Grace, talks about his identity as a Christian and an American and about his volunteer work, through the church, at a local shelter for disadvantaged teens.

How It Worked: The Story of Clarence H. Snyder and the Early Days of Alcoholics Anonymous in Cleveland, Ohio (NY: AA Big Book Study Group, 1997), pp. 58, 68 - 71; and, from several sources, the evidence about «surrender» strongly indicates it involved the following:

Endō's deep ambivalence about Christianity pervades his text, which means that there is also evidence in the book and film to support the interpretation favored by Fr.

Carefully itemizing mercantile bills of sale, inventories of militia and volunteer detachments, the evidence that there was a lack of gun - smiths, records of importation of guns from Europe, the incidence of duels (three in the entire South in the 1760s, none fatal), children's books and toys, comments by eyewitnesses about the abysmal shooting ability of settlers (lacking both the weapons and the gunpowder to practice), court records, and a wide variety of other historiographical resources, the author assembles an overwhelming mass of data to show that military prowess was not, in fact, characteristic of early Americans.

Have you even thought about looking at the updated evidence or do you think that all 2000 year old books tell the complete truth?

I just wan na say weather what proof you have or evidence every religion book, scriptures, and testamony might know how the world will end but does nt know cause if everybody knew what day it was going to happen they would do all the things that people are doing following this man like quiting jobs and all that because in the bible under «THE CALL TO READINESS «it says God or jesus does nt want you to worry about when the world will end but the do want you to keep busy and continue to work hard JUST LIKE GOD DID TO CREATE the world so i do nt think noone should buy into this and it shouldnt be advertised cause thats not what GOD or JESUS would want because when he rises unexpectedly key word unexpectedly his joy and his welcoming would be him nknowing that the creatures aka as us humans have been following his will and working hard!!!

He was presented with fiftyeight peer - reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system; however, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not «good enough.»

Questions about the unity and authorship of a book can not be settled in terms of a scholar's orthodoxy but solely on the basis of his competence in assessing the evidence.

The direct evidence consists of what Whitehead himself tells us, first, about how his books are meant to be read and understood, about the genesis of his ideas, and about modifications in his views; and second, about the nature of his thinking, about his difficulties in translating his thoughts into words, about the sources of his philosophical terminology, and about the peculiar manner in which he composed his books.

Most history books, not religious ones, give evidence about how down trodden and poor the Israelites were until the later part of the 20th century.

What about the practical issues such as the fact that there is no historical or archaeological evidence whatever for anything in the book of Mormon?

As far as evidence goes, he was written about in multiple biblical sources, which obviously you won't take into account because you believe the bible to be fantasy, but when you think about how all biblical books were written at different times, in different places, by different people, you can at least say there is a decent chance he lived.

He was presented with fifty - eight peer - reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system; however, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not «good enough.»

Assuming that Dawkins has equal confidence in all parts of his book, I shall simply challenge him at representative points, and let readers draw their own conclusions about the overall reliability of his evidence and judgement» (p. xii).

Tell him the book he keeps by his bed was written by an invisible deity who will punish him with fire for eternity if he fails to accept its every incredible claim about the universe, and he seems to require no evidence whatsoever.

As evidence, she pointed to a 2011 study in the United Kingdom which found that three - quarters of the 6,000 young adults ages 18 to 22 years interviewed about their experiences in sports earlier in adolescence reported at least 1 incident of emotional harm playing sports, one third of whom identified their coach as the main source of harm, and to a 2005 study - one which I cited in my 2006 book, Home Team Advantage (Harper Collins), and in articles adapted from that book for MomsTEAM.com - finding that 45 % of children reported verbal misconduct by coaches, including name - calling and insulting them during play.

You can watch documentaries about birth, as well as read informational articles and books that offer an unbiased, evidence - based look at pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum.

Comments about the hostile response to any request for home birth confirm the anecdotal reports of consumer groups such as the Association for the Improvement in Maternity Services and the National Childbirth Trust and evidence to the Expert Maternity Group.1 In addition, many women who had booked a home birth were later transferred to hospital for delivery, both before and after the onset of labour.

She obviously thinks she know enough science to write a book promoting the safety of homebirth, run a website promoting the safety of homebirth, write articles in magazines and on websites like The Daily Beast promoting the safety of homebirth, but she doesn't think you know enough to debate the scientific evidence about the safety of homebirth?

Throughout the book you will find stories and tips from mothers like you and health professionals who give evidence - based advice about all aspects of birth and early parenthood, from where to give birth to positive caesarean, skin - to skin contact and breastfeeding.

Fox, Isabelle BEING THERE Barron's, 1996 This book reveals startling evidence about the critical importance of a parent's presence in a child's early years.

Asked if she had evidence to prove multinationals evade taxes, the former CPP chairperson said «it is all there in the books, people know it but people don't talk about it».

For as much as Churchill's Secret War seems to zero in on decisions taken by the war - time prime minister and his adviser Lord Cherwell, the racism and sheer odium of both of whom is on stark display in the evidence presented by Mukerjee, this book is much more of an indictment of what colonialism was really about than the title suggests.

And, in light of the furor still raging over the teaching of evolution, the book presents a lot of new evidence about how evolution works at the most fundamental level.

Where Neanderthals are concerned, Binford pops up again in his familiar «Rent - a-sceptic» role; but it is regrettable that the book gives further exposure to his bizarre notions, based on the flimsiest of evidence, about males and females living largely separate lives, with no semblance of a close family, as well as his erroneous claim that a lack of fish - bones shows that Neanderthals were inferior to «fully modern man» at exploiting this resource.

Roy Craig's riveting book UFOs: An Insider's View of the Official Quest for Evidence, about his investigations for the U.S. Air Force's Colorado Project, includes an account of veteran police officers in Georgia chasing a mysterious, fast - moving object «about 500 feet above the ground.»

I was reminded of the old debate and the modern evidence about it by Ted Kerasote's excellent and best - selling book on all things dog, «Merle's Door.»

I enjoyed reading about how she overcame all of those issues, but my favorite part of the book was her explanations on how she handled common objections, combated anecdotal evidence, and dealt with negativity from people who were threatened, and / or didn't understand why she chose to give up the standard American diet for a plant - based lifestyle.

As you'll see when you get our book, we give great weight to avoiding toxic compounds in plant foods, but have no strong recommendations about vegetables — we recommend eating them to taste, since the evidence suggests their health impact is minimal, not clearly positive or negative.

You have read Dr. Greger's book, so you know what I'm talking about in terms of the vast evidence behind the overall benefits of a diet of «low» (low is relative in this conversation) fat whole plant foods..

The genetic evidence is not (as) clear as some people that make a living by selling books about Paleo might be claiming.

Not much is known about that iteration yet, but evidence points to a fairly significant reimagining of the book's narrative, which is a given if it's going to be an ongoing television series.

No proof has ever been found about the alternative writers although all the circumstantial evidence points to it being the case, In my book, the Pelican code (a modern thriller) proof is found and takes up where Anonymous leaves off.

WHY: Robert De Niro may be choosing better scripts these days, but he's not immune to appearing in bad movies, as evidenced in this direct - to - video thriller that plays like a mix between «Speed» and «John Q.» Director Scott Mann and writer Stephen Cyrus Sepher have created an incredibly predictable crime flick that uses just about every cliché in the book, from the desperate father trying to save his child, to the villain with a crisis of conscience.

There's something deeply, perhaps historically unsettling about the rational way these backwater neo-Nazis send their plot into motion, remembering to balance the books and selecting the weapons that leave behind the least evidence.

After all, Salamon's book is really just proof of what's evidenced on screen and observed by contemporary audiences: Decisions were made to pander to the lowest common denominator, and say what you will about the lowest common denominator, but it often knows when it's being condescended to.

However, in a recent blog post about his book at the Washington Post, Willingham pointed out that, by all available evidence, «most study time in elementary grades is devoted to English Language Arts and math, with other subjects (science, civics, geography et al.) accounting for perhaps ten or fifteen percent of instructional time.»