Sentences with phrase «books about science»

He has reported from the 2015 Paris climate negotiations, the Northwest Passage, and the Greenland ice sheet, among other locations, and has written four books about science, politics and climate change.

Books about science or medicine, for example, are generally written by scientists or doctors.

Some of the greatest nonfiction books about science read like novels.

The really motivating part of building Lulu over the last few years has been the remarkable works that are uniquely available on our virtual shelves — non-fiction books about science, commerce, art and history and novels that show the rich imaginations of creators from around the world.

I've always been a kind of omnivorous reader, devouring fiction, nonfiction, narrative essays, short stories, books about science — you name it.

He also wrote successful — and highly readable — popular books about science.

He is the author of 10 books about science, the most recent of which are A Planet of Viruses and Science Ink: Tattoos of the Science Obsessed.

I think that has made it possible for more scientists to engage the public, to the point where reputable scientists can write books about science and not have to suffer like Gamow suffered decades ago.

Many books about science are meant to be pleasure reading.

There are so many great fiction and non-fiction books about science.

«Nature's goal is to get you addicted to the baby,» Maia Szalavitz, a science journalist who co-authored a book about the science of bonding, called «Born for Love», told Business Insider.

Imagine: How Creativity Works by Jonah Lehrer — I expected this book about the science behind creativity to be informative, but I never expected it to be so practical.

«Oh, that Maury's a sly one,» said Shirley O. Corriher, author of «CookWise» (William Morrow, 1997), a book about science in the kitchen.

This is a shortened, illustrated version of Bill Bryson's famous, hilarious, and insightful book about science.

A popular science writer who has written a book about science - themed tattoos reveals some of the surprises he encountered along the way

Bill Gifford is author of Spring Chicken: Stay Young Forever (Or Die Trying), a book about the science of aging.

Yet, check out the categories into which Amazon lumped this book about science:

The best book about the science behind ketogenic diets is The Art and Science of Low Carbohydrate Living by Dr. Stephen Phinney and Dr. Jeff Volek.

For anyone craving more information, I highly recommend Mindsight by Dan Siegel, which is a much denser book about the science and complexities of adult attachment issues, how they play out in real life, and what can realistically be done to resolve them.

Not exact matches

He doesn't mention data science at all, but the book is about cognitive bias.

While Gates admits he isn't usually «one for tear - jerkers about death and dying,» he was drawn to Kalanithi's search for meaning through books, writing, his family, medicine, surgery, and science.

In his book The World in 2050: Four Forces Shaping Civilization's Northern Future, Laurence Smith, a professor of geography and earth and space sciences at UCLA, argues that we're about to see a productivity and culture boom in the north, driven by climate change, shifting demographics, globalization and the hunt for natural resources.

I really like speculative science fiction, and the book is close enough to now to have some reality to it — it's about environmental disasters.

I read books about the female brain, met with science and math elementary school teachers and nonprofit educators who were doing programs to get kids interested in STEM.

Jeffrey Pfeffer proclaims in this new book that «much of the oft - repeated conventional wisdom about leadership is based more on hope than reality, on wishes rather than data, on beliefs instead of science.»

The book equips you for online success with a one - stop source on the art and science of developing marketing content that people care about.

Modern science is the cornerstone of your belief system, as ancient writings that I consider to be God given, holy inspired and very relevant to modern times (as well as every society that ever was and will be) is the cornerstone of my belief system, because everything about this book has been accurate in every way, unlike modern science.

``... as ancient writings that I consider to be God given, holy inspired and very relevant to modern times (as well as every society that ever was and will be) is the cornerstone of my belief system, because everything about this book has been accurate in every way, unlike modern science.»

RE: «when you're standing before your judgment being judged for the things you deny, how about taking all of those science books and «reason» with you» So, you're so SURE gawwwwwwd didn't give us science that you forego all medical treatment, and you live like the Amish....

So when you're standing before your judgment being judged for the things you deny, how about taking all of those science books and «reason» with you.

DO NOT think that claims about science and the natural world are more likely true because they are written in new books.

I also agree that it is not a book of science, the way I see it, the Bible is a way for us to learn about God and one of the ways He uses to talk to us, and to be honest, I don't really pay attention to the evolution theory or any other theories, if it really happened or not (or if it keeps on happening), is fine by me, I respect those who believe them to be true.

The only place where the Bible and science conflict at all is the science of origins (if science it could be called), and that is only an issue if one insists that 1) genesis is absolutely literal; 2) genesis is the whole story and there is nothing more; 3) traditional assumptions about genesis are the only ones and there is no other way to understand the book.

So a proven, verified, science is hokum to you, but a book written by ignorant men all about god magic makes sense?

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

Because science has kind of proven or talked about all those things you were just asking... maybe pick up a book other than a work of fiction and learn something that's real and tangible.

• Alister McGrath, promoting his critique of Dawkins» book The God Delusion, writes in the Daily Mail about his own return to Christianity (having been brought up a Protestant in Northern Ireland) whilst studying science at Oxford.

(ex: Elaine Ecklund wrote about it in her book Science vs. Religion.

If for you your faith is only about «worshiping» the words in a book (which are written by man)... think about it... you might be wasting your time and not realize how distant you actually have become (from the true msg) worrying about trivialities or needing to reconcile scripture with science / common sense... simply because your book (and your self - imposed obligation to believe in the words) doesn't leave you another option.

I always attributed this disconnect to my general frustrations with modern evangelicalism — that it's been hijacked by the Republican Party, that it's in a perpetual state of defensiveness and «wartime» posturing, that it has closed itself off to science and independent thought, that it has lost sight of the message of Jesus regarding the Kingdom of God, that it has become commercialized and shallow — all the things we «emergers» like to write books and articles about.

They even had a few things correct about science... as well as a lot of fantasies and superst.itions - just like your book.

JDJ, «Smart» isn't learning science from your preacher, or from a book written thousands of years ago by men who know relatively little about the natural world.

Read science books, learn about the cosmos, have someone explain physics, and quantum mechanics to you.

That's sort of like saying, «you can't understand or talk about science if you haven't read this or that book».

creationism is far from an adult theory, its a child like story with fantasy elements based on myth and NO science, we always hear about these crazy people trying to outlaw evolution.But has you stated we have billions of years of evidence, thanks for helping us evolutionists out, unfortunately you have none, just a book, no science, no artifacts, no garden of eden, no bones of adam or eve or even the snake for that matter, no ark, no proof of a biblical flood, no proof of a created world by a higher power, no nothing..

That Dawkins, whose newest book is Science in the Soul: Selected Writings of a Passionate Rationalist, spouts off about religion and religions isn't news to anyone.

And the fact that science hadn't discovered this yet means that once I figure out how to lure the fish out, I could write books about it, and maybe become as famous as Christopher Columbus who discovered that the earth was round!

Mike Hulme is the author of the excellent Why We Disagree About Climate Change, which was one of The Economist «s four science and technology books of the year in 2009.

I think it would be interesting to see the answers to some harder questions about holy books and about science (as it relates to theology).

Oh and by the way, the other genius who is posing as me talking about burnign science books is not the real Erik, I am.