Some self - publishing companies turn out better looking
books than traditional publishers.
Ultimately, I realized that I could do an equal or better job publishing
my book than any traditional publisher.
Just like I have the potential of making more money this way, an E-Publisher needs to sell fewer
books than a traditional publisher to recoup its expenses and start making a profit.
Not exact matches
Self and Independent publishing can get your
book to the market three times faster
than the
traditional publisher.
Yes, you can get the attention of an agent and
publisher with 60,000
book sales — especially since the
traditional publishing averages LESS
than 5,000.
Had this seemingly groundbreaking movement begun with
traditional publishers ten years ago, right when the digital
book revolution was just barely beginning to stir,
traditional publishers could have OWNED this industry rather
than simply reacting to it.
I have professionally produced
books for digital and print platforms that look as good or better
than many I see from
traditional publishers.
To be honest, I've earned more in the last year selling my
books directly
than I would have received as an advance from a
traditional publisher.
Yes the royalties are higher
than one would expect to earn from a
traditional publisher but it hardly offsets the amount of money spent by the author getting their
book to press through one of these
publishers.
You can make upwards of 70 percent more per
book than you would through a
traditional or independent
publisher.
Animals — Less
than 1 % Less
than 1/5 Concepts — 8 % 5 % Holidays / festivals / religion — 9 % 3 % History / sports / people / places — 10 % 5 % Education / reference / language — 15 % 10 % Games / activities / hobbies — 20 % 18 % Biographies / autobiographies — 28 % 12 % Social situation / family / health — 22 % 65 % Does this mean that the sales go to
traditional publishers because their
books are better illustrated and published?
Today, her self - published Gansett Island Series, roundly rejected by
traditional publishers, has sold more
than 2.5 million ebooks and is still going strong at
book 16.
Force, a New York Times and USA Today contemporary romance author who has written more
than 50
books, was at the forefront of the indie publishing wave in 2010 when she self - published
books that had been rejected by
traditional publishers.
Also, self - publishing titles tend to include
books that are locally focused, narrate family histories, are niche and at times more risque — around religion, politics, sex and sexuality —
than what a
traditional publisher might wish to handle, Fulton and Bradley said.
Almost all
publishers only accept submissions through agents, so they are essential gatekeepers for anyone trying to sell a
book in the
traditional market rather
than self - publishing.
Stephanie Bond: «If I had any qualms about leaving
traditional publishing, they were settled last fall: the royalty check I received from my
publisher representing six months of sales for over 40 projects was less
than I'd made the previous day in KDP royalties for about 12
books.»
Productivity — do you write more
books per year
than a
traditional publisher can handle?
But in general, I believe the quality of ebooks is much lower
than that of printed
books; from both
traditional and self
publishers.
Trautmann: I'm not sure it's «especially» suited to «Frost,» honestly, other
than our «
book» is not something that
traditional comics
publishers would pick up.
But don't blog any more
than a paragraph or two if your
book is unpublished and you hope to get a
traditional publisher some day.
Since the financial returns from self - publishing per
book are so many times greater
than the royalties paid by
traditional publishers, I could easily cut the marketing firm in on the returns.
Traditional publishers make more in selling author services
than selling
books.
I agree that some self published
books are miles better
than some published
books that come from
traditional publishers.
And for everyone who says you have a better chance of getting reviewed with a
traditional house
book than with an indie
book, it did not turn out to be the case with this
book brought out by a powerhouse
publisher.
I have created more
than 2000
book covers for large,
traditional publishing organizations, small presses and indie
publishers.
However, since
traditional publishers own the means of mass production for print
books, their per - unit costs are lower
than mine, which means they can offer a print edition for less
than I can.
Although the jury is still out on my self - published
books, «How to be the Luckiest Man Alive» and «I Was Blind But Now I See» I can tell you these two have already sold more
than my five
books with
traditional publishers, combined.
I've done it after 19
books with
traditional publishers, but I still make more money from those
than from my indies.
But other
books may only be read thanks to the different kind of support, of enabling, that comes with the
traditional publishing infrastructure; if someone other
than the author is able to produce them, which might mean needing the existence of a
publisher able to back the
book's production
Self -
publishers can race their
books to market much faster
than traditional publishers can, particularly if they're producing ebook and print - on - demand
books only.
At Page Two we feel strongly that if you're funding your
book, a hybrid
publisher should give you full royalties, or at least much better royalty rates
than a
traditional publisher would pay (i.e. better
than 10 - 15 % of the retail price).
As a writer, Terry has published more
than 60
books with
traditional publishers such as Zondervan, St. Martins Press, Tyndale and others.
Despite the advances,
traditional publishing will probably always exist and, rather
than changing, some people still look down upon any
book that is not published by a
traditional publisher.
The lawsuit alleges Apple and the
book publishers employed an «agency model» in which
publishers set their own e-
book prices, rather
than the
traditional wholesale model in which
publishers set a retail price and retailers set their own sales price.
He has written more
than 60
books through
traditional publishers in a wide range of topics from children's
books to biographies to co-authored
books.
I've had some absolute car crashes in
traditional publishing, including instances where I'm certain I could have sold more copies of the
book myself
than via a
traditional publisher.
Having published more
than a dozen
books — nonfiction and fiction — with both
traditional and often prestigious
publishers as well as on my own, I have a very good sense of the demands of
book promotion and was delighted to have the chance to work with Smith Publicity who did a fine job with my Sino - American Tales series of historical novels
In a world where
traditional publishers are still basically brokering to sell and warehouse paper rather
than books (i.e. sticking to an antiquated business model in a market where ebooks are rapidly growing to be the majority of sales and shouldn't be ignored), this is a landmark deal.
They would abandon the slow, turgid, and overpriced
books from
traditional publishers to the point where trad
publishers would be worse off
than ever before.
Although I would argue that
traditional publishers» net profit on hardcovers is probably slimmer
than it used to be, given the growing costs of warehousing, shipping, and manufacturing even as hardcover
book sales are decreasing.
While reprint
publishers have been the biggest contributors by introducing hundreds of thousands of recycled works to the market,
traditional publishers have also contributed as many, if not more,
books than indie authors.
Eisler, a former CIA operative turned author, has been one of the most prominent examples of self - publishing, along with fellow writers J.A. Konrath and young - adult author Amanda Hocking — who made more
than two million dollars by publishing her own
books via the Kindle marketplace (often charging as little as 99 cents for them) before signing a $ 2 - million deal with a
traditional publisher earlier this year.
Translators are arguably the ones who, (apart from the author, of course) work so thoroughly on a
book that we are more likely
than most to get a deep understanding, yet I have never come across any
traditional publisher who wanted to hear my opinion.
As I described in a recent post, Eisler said that what made the decision to go with Amazon easy was that the web giant promised to not only get his
books to market faster — both in print and electronic form — but also offered to sell them at a lower price
than the
traditional publisher, and apparently (although the terms of his deal weren't released) gave him a bigger share in the proceeds to boot.
Rather
than attempt to shop the
book around to
traditional publishers, he instead decided to post chapters of the novel on a blog page.
Reason # 3... I can get my
books out to far, far, far more places and into more stores and more countries around the world as an indie
publisher than I ever could through a
traditional publisher.
That's how you know you're working with a firm that is more likely to treat your
book as a unique product in the marketplace — as a
traditional publisher would — rather
than as another widget on the assembly line.
As an independent
publisher you will receive a higher royalty for your
book than you would if you signed a
traditional publishing deal.
But I think it's interesting to be able to see how the
traditional publishers think they can make a
book — in many cases one that's already sold hundreds of thousands of copies — better
than what the author envisioned.»
Third, because of advances in printing, they can bring
books to market more quickly
than traditional publishers.