In most cases, the higher court costs will be
borne by litigants or the lawyers who work on contingency fees in civil cases, attorneys said yesterday.
Not exact matches
«We are being asked to do more work than ever to prepare for hearings, and during hearings; and we must also
bear the brunt of the added difficulties presented and experienced
by litigants in person, often in very stressful circumstances, and — in family cases —
by the added strains on local authority budgets.»
... costs
borne by society at large include: costs associated with delays in court and administrative proceedings; increased court operation costs attributable to unrepresented
litigants and accused; and, more broadly, costs associated with legal problems that are not resolved in an acceptable manner (including increased health care costs, increased social assistance costs and so on).
After an overview of the Employment Tribunal regime in chapter 1, it launches into a consideration of the need for advice, thus openly pitching to the lowest common denominator of the
litigant in person while in a balanced and unbiased manner (
bearing in mind that it is written
by seasoned practitioners) considering whether professional assistance is necessary.
Further, the suggestion that the employer should
bear the burden of persuasion due to superior access to evidence has little force in the Title VII context, where the liberal discovery rules available to all
litigants are supplemented
by EEOC investigatory files.