Sentences with phrase «bother reading»

So many people have so many steps that I don't even want to bother reading the tutorial because I know there must be a shorter method.
David, did you even bother reading the RECO case against Mr. Moranis or understand what it means??? If he gets the last laugh the housing industry will change as we know it, and you may find in the long run its not for the better.
A cover letter provides a brief introduction and let's the hiring manager know why you may be a good fit for the job (and why he should bother reading your resume).
In fact, some hiring managers may not even bother reading your resume if it diverts from the standard format.
Some may not bother reading the rest if they find the resume objective attractive enough — they just pick up the phone and call the candidate in for an interview.
Some hiring managers do not even bother reading other resume sections if they do not like what they see in a resume objective.
Because it is standard, some traditional companies may consider it a mistake to vary, and some hiring managers may not even bother reading it if it is too different.
• Write your resume on one page because employers are short of time and don't bother reading the second page.
Sometimes, hiring managers do not bother reading the entire resume, concentrating on what the objective has to say solely.
Many employers do not bother reading the rest of the resume once they have scanned the objective.
Yes, there are times when hiring managers do not bother reading an entire resume because it is difficult to navigate, or the information in it is simply not according to what... Read More»
Yes, there are times when hiring managers do not bother reading an entire resume because it is difficult to navigate, or the information in it is simply not according to what they were expecting.
None of the above; most people won't bother reading clichés, either.
At times, many recruiters sometimes not even bother reading your resume, so your cover letter should also briefly say it all.
While we are not implying that all employers don't bother reading entire resumes, many actually don't.
So even if the hiring manager does not bother reading the rest of the resume in detail, he can simply judge the jobseeker by reading the objective.
Recruiters know this and the last thing they want (or will bother reading) is a long list of all your responsibilities.
Your cover letter should introduce who you are, but most importantly, give a reason why they should bother reading your resume or looking at your work.
If the letter is of poor quality, the hiring manager or recruiter might not even bother reading the resume.
Understand that a manager will glance quickly at a resume and decide in seconds whether to bother reading further.
And sometimes, they don't even bother reading the resume.
Rather than bother reading it all to get to the stuff that matters, you leave the website.
You can probably expect that no one else but you will ever bother reading your second page.
Some recruiters will look at a cover letter first to determine whether they even want to bother reading a resume.
In this age low - information, some will read the headline, blame Apple and not bother reading even the first paragraph of the article.
Did not bother reading, just listened to your audio.
You don't have to bother reading lengthy text to learn.
The problem is that Max doesn't bother reading the hundreds to thousands of papers to know what scientists think (defined as their summaries and conclusions from their research).
I think posters who use few words are more likely to be called trolls than those who use lots of words, as fewer people bother reading anything that's very long.
They will probably be from people who will not even bother reading Al Gore's long op - ed in the Sunday New York Times.
Why bother reading their stuff anymore?
Also, I guess, you assume they would never bother reading any of the papers written by Climate Scientists and those in related fields.
Just making the general point that there's not an alarmist alive who's even going to bother reading this, much less be persuaded by it...
It's by Montford so you won't bother reading it.
I see that he relies on posting such long, unedited drivel that nobody will ever bother reading it all to see whether he actually proves the points he claims he does.
Didn't you bother reading the post?
For those of us who will bother reading it, were there particular «glaring errors of analysis» that you would like to draw attention to so I can look for them?
I note the actual paper buried in your link https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00376-018-8011-z.pdf (your usual bad form JD not going for the actual paper or is the press all you bother reading if it agrees with your prejudices?)
Willard, that's all very nice but as you know I never bother reading «skeptical» discourse, since I'm already a «skeptic.»
No, I just don't bother reading them because I don't want to be put to sleep.
As for Tim Ball, he is so completely discredited (with having lost that lawsuit involving him lying about his academic credentials) that nobody but those truly in denial would even bother reading his tripe.
Two, you didn't bother reading my comment.
This, of course, invokes Anthro / Sol / Vol as drivers of the early 20th century warming and thus contradicts the troll but he is too is to stupid / lazy / dishonest to bother reading the paper he cites to check such things out, so ignore that part of the paper.
If he can't tell or we can't trust him to tell us the truth about something so easy to verify, why bother reading a single thing he writes?
I have an alternative interpretation of tl; dr. «Totally lost, don't read» as in don't bother reading what comes after tl; dr because the person is talking about something they couldn't be bothered to look at, yet still thinks his / her opinion is worthwhile.
Did you even bother reading the article or did you assume Sega's going to release some DC - style controller based on 1st pic?
I scrolled down and saw 3.1 so i didn't bother reading the review.
not even going to bother reading the comments.
Too many grammatical errors in three sentences for me to even bother reading this.
This is a good little test to see how many people bother reading the whole thing before flaming.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z