Why
bother writing reviews for years by getting free games?
Not exact matches
I didn't even
bother writing entries
for Clint Eastwood's «J. Edgar» and the «Shrek» spin - off «Puss in Boots» because the sooner we forget about both movies the better, while other noteworthy titles like Criterion's «Anatomy of a Murder» and the first season of BBC's «The Fades» weren't available
for review.
If i ever
wrote a book, i'd just hire a PR agency to market it
for me, and not even
bother with fan interaction on
review sites.
I'm just too busy
writing my next set of paid
for reviews to be
bothered to respond...
Only if the people rating it actually bought and used it
for $ 100,000 — that is the problem in my opinion —
writing reviews for products not used / read
bothers me.
Graham Wayne, a journalist with the UK's Guardian, apparently
wrote this «
review» of Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science
for the anti-skeptic blog SkepticalScience.com without
bothering to read the book.
Even papers that I
write are given to people I not only know, but people I expect will criticize me openly,
for all to see (a problem I have with my current job is that I have a hard time getting
reviews because we are so small, which
bothers me).