Sentences with phrase «bottom graph shows»

The bottom graph shows the longer record, which supports that conclusion.
The bottom graph shows the primary ~ 60 yr.
The bold line in the bottom graph shows the modeled spectral results including the effects of the long - term changes in the trace gases CO2, O3, N2O, CH4, CFC11 and CFC12.
The bottom graph shows the sound associated with this migration, which happens at dusk and dawn and is outlined by rectangles.

Not exact matches

There was no spike in Google searches for «charter schools» (the bottom line in the graph) after the show aired, even though KIPP and most of the other schools featured were charters.
Can your students understand this time series graph showing the teams being voted as likely to come bottom of the English Premiership during the football season 04/05?
Falling test scores, and mediocre English Language performance have plagued Rockteship schools over the past year, as shown in graphs at the bottom of this post.
If you click the «Proceeds» tab, the graph changes to show your total earnings each day, and the list at the bottom changes to show the total earnings for each book.
I have included my author rank for Fantasy / Science Fiction (bottom graph), to show you how the giveaway has had no impact on that, since Smile is a children's book.
Pages 28 - 36: These show the same graph of total investment assets as before, with the bottom line probability number from the Monte Carlo simulation.
However, for the U.S. stock sectors shown in the bottom two rows of graphs, the correlations have trended downward for many years and have declined substantially.
Many of the biggest up days in the stock market happen after a long - term bottom is achieved as the blue line for the S&P 500 shows in the above graph.
The graph at the very bottom of the Index Model (also shown on the demo) shows how the Fee - Based Models have done when properly compared to their benchmarks.
The rose diagram describes the distribution of swell directions and swell sizes, while the graph at the bottom shows the same thing but without direction information.
The Digital Foundry team, in the video has shown a graph at the bottom of the screen which compares the frame rate consistency of the game while it is running.
Their «bottom line» is graphed at Figure 7, and does indeed show a slightly concave profile suggestive of overall acceleration — though it is true that there is a lot of variability, and both accelerations and decelerations can be found in the record.
The temperature graph at the bottom of this article shows the temperatures of the earth before Christ to 2040.
The graph shows that the El Niño year 1998 is at the top and the last two cool La Niña years are at the bottom of the model projection range (for the various reasons explained above).
Note that the 2012 and 2013 values (shown in yellow in the bottom graph) have not been normalized back to 2011/2012 values.
The interesting extrapolation graph (hidden in the bottom left) shows 4 more degrees of warming and CO2 levels over 1000 ppm by 2100 if the manmade exponential use of carbon continues (which is pessimistic).
What's going on in your «standard way of showing» bottom graph?
The two graphs above show the monthly number of spotless days during this cycle transit (red) compared to respectively the average number during SC10 to 15 and 24 (SCo; top), and during SC16 to 23 (SCn; bottom).
The bottom line here is the models are wrong no matter what graph you use, this arguing about graphs does not show you in a good light (what are you trying to avoid type thing).
Here is a challenging week in detail, the top graph shows the gaps that need to be filled in with storage, the bottom graphs with the gaps filled by storage and also how much supply is «spilled ``:
Looking at the bottom of the AR4 map, the graph for the entire globe shows a declining and then basically flat blue curve for natural forcings.
The graph appears exactly as shown in the Connolly et al. (2017) paper, which is clearly described on the bottom line of the graph itself:
Has a nice little discussion on these two specific graphs and considering the amount of reseearch and data that shows the bottom one is «closer» to being right then the small amount that went into the top one — and the issues of splicing different temperature sets — and the data originating from an incredibly small region demographically, common sense would suggest you view the top one with more skepticism.
You can show that it does by illustrating water vapour as being very «thick» at the bottom of the graph and very «thin» at the top because water vapour declines with temperature which declines with altitude.
The hockeystick graph [bottom graph below] claims that the 20th century showed unusually rapid warming — and thus suggests a strong human influence.
As shown in the graph below, cosmic - ray intensity (as measured by the radioactive carbon isotope C - 14) and terrestrial climate (as measured by the oxygen isotope O - 18) correlate in amazing detail over an interval of at least 3000 years (see graph below; the bottom graph is the central section, blown up to reveal detail)
These graphs show Arctic sea ice motion for May 2 to 8, 2016 (top) and July 25 to 31, 2016 (bottom).
If you drew a graph to show your career path, would it be a nice, straight arrow that starts from the bottom left corner and goes consistently upward to the upper right?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z