Sentences with phrase «bought more shares because»

Since then I bought more shares because even at a much higher price now, I still believe that the price of gold is on a new bull run.

Keep in mind Usmanov has recently bought more shares because he wants Arsenal and that guy offered Arsenal FC a interest free loan to cover all our debts when we moved into our new home and allow Wenger to invest what the club earned back into the club.

Since then I bought more shares because even at a much higher price now, I still believe that the price of gold is on a new bull run.

Not exact matches

Businesses may actually end up buying more online ads on Facebook to promote themselves, because simply creating content and attempting to share it on the news feed for free will no longer work as well as it once did.

That's because many big enterprises regularly issue more stock than they buy back, using the proceeds for repurchase of new shares from newly exercised options and vested restricted stock, for M&A, and for secondary offerings.

Because they have a smaller number of shares outstanding, these stocks tend to be less liquid, making buying and selling more difficult.

The long - term trend of earnings per share for American businesses is up because large corporations retain earnings that they can use to pay down debt, buy back stock, or grow operations, and this allows us to have the reasonable certainty that Coca - Cola, Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, PepsiCo, and the rest of the usual suspects will be worth more ten years from now.

The problem arises, however, when expectations become mismatched: The Gordons no longer sought to create wealth because they did not need more money in their bank accounts, while owners of the enterprise presumably bought shares because they wanted to get richer.

TBH I think Kroenke is our biggest problem, because he simply does not care about Arsenal, as long as he can get rewards from our reserves for «advisory services» or a dividend as it's more commonly known, and he is also going to be the one most difficult to get rid of, as it's very unlikely he'll sell unless someone makes him an offer he can't refuse, he hits financial problems where he'll have to sell, or Arsenal become extremely unprofitable — all of which are extremely unlikely, given that the share price has gone up over 60 % since he bought.

I wanted to share some more of my Shopbop favorites because it is such a short sale and it's a great time to buy some wardrobe staples.

I'll be sharing some of my favorite trendier / more statement pieces in up coming post but I just wanted to remind y ’ all that just because the season is changing doesn't mean you have to break the bank and buy a completely new wardrobe, sometimes keeping it simple is best.

Catherine explains she would love to share her enthusiasm for these collectable designer pieces in a modern venue, like Harrods Department store, because she believes the English have a better appreciation for all things vintage than the French, who are more likely to use accessories that were passed down through the generations rather than buying vintage pieces themselves.

In fact, they are much more likely to hold hands with their partner, share an intimate kiss, write a love note, take their partner out on date night and even buy small gifts, just because.

(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.

You can do this deliberately, such as having a «list share» or «you buy my 99cent book and I'll buy yours» — and you can do some of that also, but you'll make a better impression if you just help people without asking for anything in return (if they do return the favor, they'll do it because they want to and it will be more effective).

Dollar cost averaging is better because as the prices go down, your purchases will buy more units or shares of the investment.

@reirab Because the gambling of buying and selling shares is a prevalent aspect of the market, then reinvesting to create more value is a viable workaround, but does not add wealth to the investors, only inflates the asset worth IF it is sold for that value.

It's a strategic way to invest because you buy more shares when the cost is low, so you get an average cost per share over time, meaning you don't have to invest the time and effort to monitor market movements and strategically time your investments.

If you had bought a dividend - paying stock one day or more before the ex-dividend date, you would have still gotten the dividend (because the shares were trading cum - dividend).

A broker won't lose money when a stock goes down in a bear market because the broker is usually nothing more than an agent acting on sellers» behalf in finding somebody else who wants to buy the shares.

However, it turns out to be a little more complicated than that because companies do not share the same valuation, meaning that some companies allow you to buy more future profits than others when you take into account the current price of the stock in question.

This has the effect of skewing the average cost of the shares down because more are bought when the stock is trading lower.

You can buy as many shares as you want - what will happen, once you bought some millions of shares, prices will go up further and further (because of the huge demand you produce), until you can not afford any more.

Although it's nice to publish big, fancy numbers on these updates I really wish the run in equities was much less and I'd actually have larger ownership stakes in many companies because my money would have bought more shares.

Because you bought more shares when they were less expensive.

If you buy a dividend - paying stock one day or more before the ex-dividend date, you will still get the dividend (because the shares are trading cum - dividend).

They also tend to be less risky because they're more diversified than just buying shares in one company.

I usually don't buy stocks that cost a lot of money to get a share, those priced in hundreds of dollars, because I always like to own more shares.

Because when you are dollar cost averaging you are buying the same dollar amount each month, but you buy more SHARES when the stock price drops.

The dividend stream has increased not only because the companies in the portfolio have been raising their dividends, but also because I am reinvesting those dividends to buy more shares.

Typically, a larger free - float means that the stock's volatility was lower because there are more traders buying and selling the shares.

I needed to buy more shares in order to DRIP again, but for the last few months, I didn't quite have the cash on hand because I was buying up other stocks that were cheaper.

Don't worry about the strength of the USD to CAD too much because converting your money before you make purchases doesn't allow you to buy more shares.

Declining stock prices actually favor young investors, because it means the shares they buy have more room to grow in the decades before they hit retirement.

Instead of investing $ 1,200 in month 1 and receiving 120 shares in return, using dollar cost averaging results in an additional 6.45 shares because as the price drops, the same $ 100 buys more shares.

That's because you'll automatically buy more shares when prices are low and fewer when they're high, and you'll benefit from the long - term rising trend in the market.

That's because I was too reluctant to buy more shares given the high price level towards the end of the year.

You ended up with a profit simply because you invested a constant dollar amount, so you bought more shares when the price went down.

In other words, dollar - cost averaging works because it's a slightly contrarian strategy, where you buy more shares when the market goes down.

This takes place because, when the market is low, you buy more shares for investing the same amount of money.»

Over the longest term, your results will be superior either because the market eventually returns the price to its fair value, or because for as long as its under its fair value, your reinvested dividends or the company's share repurchases will be able to buy more shares for the same amount of money.

And because they probably realized that 10 people to one copy of a game would be more destructive than used, because people would quickly form share groups and only buy one copy.

After all, just not buying something, whether because of a formal boycott or simply because of your personal opinions about the product, is one way to exercise the power of your wallet, but sharing the reasons you do so with your peers and the public at large could have a lot more impact than simply avoiding the purchase.

But as noted above, in 2018 (and likely beyond, assuming insurers continue to add the cost of cost - sharing reductions to silver plan premiums), it may make more sense to buy a gold plan simply because it's less expensive than a silver plan, despite offering better coverage.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.

You'll be more inclined to buy high because your fellow social media users are sharing their profit stories with a particular crypto.