Sentences with phrase «bound by a declaration»

The Iraq Resolution known as «AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002» cites national policy, a war on «terrorism», and United Nations Security Council Resolutions to justify authorization of military force against Iraq, but I am not aware of any document by which the United States has been legally bound by a declaration of war against Iraq as per the federal Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11).
The Commission shall only exercise the powers provided for in this article when at least six High Contracting Parties are bound by declarations made in accordance with the preceding paragraphs.

Not exact matches

Furthermore, the resurrected Lord Jesus does in fact affirm that it is written that Christ would suffer and rise from the dead (on) the third day (Luke 24:46), a declaration confirmed, at least, by Hosea 6:1 - 2, which tells of the Lord binding and reviving and raising up those He has smitten.
This fundamental function of general civil religion could be carried out by churches that remained indifferent to the special civil religion embodied in such documents as the Declaration of Independence and bound up with the history of the American nation, but most American religious groups have been able to affirm both general and special civil religion as well as their own doctrinal peculiarities.
A DECLARATION is hereby made that by virtue of the provisions of Section 4 (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2011, the 1st Defendant / Respondent is under a binding legal obligation to provide the Plaintiff / Applicant with up to date information on the spending of recovered stolen funds, including:
Parts of the judgment read: «A DECLARATION that by virtue of the provisions of Section 4 (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2011, the Defendants are under a binding legal obligation to provide the Plaintiff with up to date information relating to the following:
During the UN summit, which he is attending as the UN Special Envoy on Climate Change, President Kufuor will participate in the «Climate Dialogue,» which is part of deliberations towards next December's Climate Change summit in Paris, France, where governments around the world are expected to make legally binding declarations towards reduction of gaseous emissions into the atmosphere to limit world temperatures to below two degrees by 2030 of pre-industrial levels.
How to put that declaration into practice is an effort that has spread over decades as additional human rights treaties and covenants have been adopted and governments have voluntarily indicated their intention to be bound by their terms.
As delegates gather in Cairo for the International Conference on Population and Development, fears are growing that opposition to the conference's draft declaration by the Vatican and some Islamic states could keep countries from making binding commitments to spend more on family planning and reproductive health.
The right to education was first entrenched in the article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) of 1948 (10) and was given effect by article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social Cultural Rights (ICESCR) of 1966 (11) so as to attain a binding authority.
By participating, each Customer and selected winner agrees: (a) to be bound by these Rules and the decisions of Virtual Brokers, (b) to release and hold harmless Virtual Brokers, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and independent contractors, and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives including advertising and promotion agencies, from any and all liability for claims / damages including, but not limited to, claims / damages for personal injury, for property damage with respect to acceptance, possession or use or misuse of the Prize or participation in the Raffle; (c) to permit Virtual Brokers to use his / her name, address, city, province, of residence, photograph, video, or any likeness for advertising or publicity purposes without any additional compensation and (d) the winner agrees to sign a Declaration and Release Form to this effecBy participating, each Customer and selected winner agrees: (a) to be bound by these Rules and the decisions of Virtual Brokers, (b) to release and hold harmless Virtual Brokers, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and independent contractors, and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives including advertising and promotion agencies, from any and all liability for claims / damages including, but not limited to, claims / damages for personal injury, for property damage with respect to acceptance, possession or use or misuse of the Prize or participation in the Raffle; (c) to permit Virtual Brokers to use his / her name, address, city, province, of residence, photograph, video, or any likeness for advertising or publicity purposes without any additional compensation and (d) the winner agrees to sign a Declaration and Release Form to this effecby these Rules and the decisions of Virtual Brokers, (b) to release and hold harmless Virtual Brokers, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and independent contractors, and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives including advertising and promotion agencies, from any and all liability for claims / damages including, but not limited to, claims / damages for personal injury, for property damage with respect to acceptance, possession or use or misuse of the Prize or participation in the Raffle; (c) to permit Virtual Brokers to use his / her name, address, city, province, of residence, photograph, video, or any likeness for advertising or publicity purposes without any additional compensation and (d) the winner agrees to sign a Declaration and Release Form to this effect.
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other states and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and many other legal theories including tort law.
This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to: (a) the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other states, and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, (b) the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, (c) human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and (d) many other legal theories including tort law.
64 (1) If a trade union has obtained a certificate by fraud, the Board may at any time declare that the trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit and, upon the making of such a declaration, the trade union is not entitled to claim any rights or privileges flowing from certification and, if it has made a collective agreement binding upon the employees in the bargaining unit, the collective agreement is void.
Article 55 (1)(a) CISA allows a country (like Germany) that, when ratifying CISA, made an official declaration in that respect, not to be bound by Article 54 in case «the acts to which the foreign judgment relates took place in whole or in part in its own territory»;
Neither did the ECJ accept the pleas that the General Court erred in law by stating that it was appropriate to refer only to the Charter of Fundamental Rights and not the ECHR (paras. 43 - 48), that the right to property can not be extended to the protection of commercial interests (paras. 49 - 63) and that the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples does not have binding force (paras. 64 - 69).
Starting with the general effects of the Charter between private parties, the Advocate General emphasized that Article 51 (1) of the Charter which speaks of application of the Charter to the Union and the Member States does not e contrario exclude effects on private parties by not mentioning them (para 29); not only do declarations of fundamental rights typically not address private parties, but Article 51 (1) also primarily addresses the completely different problem of the reach of the binding effect of the Charter for organs of the Union and the Member States rather than its effects in the relations between private parties (paras 30 - 31).
In particular, the Court concluded that: • Each unit owner is bound by the single family restriction in the declaration and entitled to insist that all other owners be similarly bound.
On the one hand, the judgment indicates that HMRC accepted that the member would have been entitled to tax relief had he made his declaration by deed (thus creating a legally binding obligation).
As a matter of law, a declaration promising to pay an amount (even if expressed to be «irrevocable») will not of itself be binding unless (a) it is made by deed, or (b) it forms part of a contract.
● West Tankers commenced court proceedings in England against Allianz and others, seeking a declaration that the subject matter of the Italian proceedings fell within the arbitration agreement and that Allianz and others were bound by the arbitration agreement.
States that make a declaration under article 36 bis (article XII of the 1980 Protocol) will be bound by article 3 as originally adopted in the Limitation Convention, 1974.
In Ireland, a deed poll is a signed declaration by a person that binds them to a particular course of action from the date of signing.
Entitlement to apply and geographical requirements Family Law Act 1975 Section 4AA — meaning of «De facto relationship» Section 90SA — not apply to certain matters covered by binding financial agreements Section 90SB — entitlement to apply Section 90SD — geographical requirements (de facto partner maintenance) Section 90SK — geographical requirements (declarations and alterations of property interests)
[T] he fact that there is no direct way to enforce in a tribunal the exhortation in the Universal Declaration aimed at «organs of society», does not by itself remove its potential binding effect.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z