The physical realm is
bound by natural laws (i.e. gravity) and there's no good reason to abandon the idea that the metaphysical realm is no different.
Not exact matches
The Church was always only able to proclaim universal moral principles, where the Christian acted as
bound by the teaching of the Church, he always had to keep his action within the framework of the principles of
natural law and of the Gospel which were taught
by the Church.
He is thus against
natural law theory but for a DCT in which God,
by creating rational creatures, is
bound to make their highest end a relationship with the divine persons, but free to pursue that end via any number of routes.
To be sure, the ancient world was not inclined to think of the universe as
bound by what we call «
natural law,» and so it did not have the problem with miracles that a scientific age has.
He would provide a profile of the early Church which was «a religious communion claiming a divine commission, and holding all other religious bodies around it heretical or infidel, a sort of secret society
binding its members together
by influence and engagement, spread over the whole world, a
natural enemy to governments, intolerant and capable of dividing families and breaking
laws.
And third, if, in fact, the document does contradict either
natural or divine positive
law, then it simply can not
bind the faithful to the obsequium religiosum, that is, the assent of mind and will, specified
by Church Lumen Gentium 25.
NAIA cherishes the human - animal bond, believing that people and animals are
bound together
by natural law in an ancient relationship that benefits both.
Since your character has defied the
natural laws of mortality, he / she is no longer
bound by fate and is now capable of carving out a new future that can't be pre-determined.
But men and women are automatically considered
natural persons
bound by the
laws no matter what they claim.