Sentences with phrase «branches of science there»

BFJ Cricklewood (146)-- In many, if not all, branches of science there are some researchers who don't manage to put it togethr properly.

Not exact matches

There is an ever growing mountain of evidence from different branches of science accu.mulated over more than a hundred and fifty years that verify Darwin's 5 laws.

There is nothing in the theory of evolution, nor in astronomy, or in geology, nor in paleontology, or any other branch of the sciences which contradicts Christianity, or any other type of theism (except Mormonism — we know scientifically that the Indian peoples of the Americas are not descended from the Jews — which is a key point of belief for them, much more central than there having been a literal Garden of Eden is for classical Christianity or JudaThere is nothing in the theory of evolution, nor in astronomy, or in geology, nor in paleontology, or any other branch of the sciences which contradicts Christianity, or any other type of theism (except Mormonism — we know scientifically that the Indian peoples of the Americas are not descended from the Jews — which is a key point of belief for them, much more central than there having been a literal Garden of Eden is for classical Christianity or Judathere having been a literal Garden of Eden is for classical Christianity or Judaism).

And there is Seung himself, gazing over the shoulder of postdoc Daniel Berger, whose monitor looks like a science fiction forest, with branches and trunks colored turquoise and cherry, floating unrooted in space.

Although this is a relatively new branch of science, there are some factors that appear to be key in controlling how quickly you age.

Fortunately or not, there are many things to write about in the field of computer science — fortunately, because you can select among wide variety of different topics; unfortunately, because if you don't have favorite branch of computer science, it will take you forever to select a topic for your thesis paper.

However, I suspect that climatology has been at the forefront of such an integrative approach — and that there is no other branch of science which requires this sort of integration to as great an extent.

In general, physics (upon which climate science is very largely based) has done as good, or better, of a job at tying underlying physical drivers to observed phenomena, as has any other branch of science, right up there with chemists and molecular biologists.

Following the Climate Change argument daily from a pro AGW position 7 years ago I have come to the conclusion that the specialisation of Science itself precludes agreement on a subject so all encompassing as Climate, it covers so many disciplines that there is no independant body that covers them all, even if there was, there is violent disagreement between branches, i.e. Cosmology — gravity v electrical universe theory.

There are no laws for conservation of temperature in any branch of climate science.

Theo Goodwin says: September 24, 2013 at 11:45 am There are no laws for conservation of temperature in any branch of climate science.

There is a branch of sociology called the sociology of science that hasn't yet been corrupted.

I've heard there are some branches of science that aren't quite like this, but I've never actually seen one first hand, and most such reports

Thingsbreak, there is a certain element of anti-science that is characterized by disavowing science (a small branch of evangelicals fall into this category, I will actually have a future post on this) and also by completely ignoring or devaluing science in favor of political or other issues.

Coming from a branch of physics where there are 2 tribes, experimentalists and theorists, I think a similar split should be considered for climate science.

Yes, if we lived in communist Russia, or in a different branch of the multiverse, there would be no private sector - funded science

Is there any other branch of science who actively seeks to expel forthwith any non believer.

It is a perfectly well respected branch of climate science and there are vast databases of documentary evidence of past weather / climate held in a variety of locations.

With the enormous sums of money being poured into all branches of science and research,, it appears to me there is an opportunity for a comprehensive journalistic expose of all activities that can be classified as suspect, or at lease «items of interest».

The reality is that climate science is built from many many many other branches of science, which is why there is just no other answer for what is going on.

For sciences are of a sociable disposition, and flourish best in the neighbourhood of each other: nor is there any branch of learning, but may be helped and improved by assistances drawn from other arts.