We could argue about details, but really there is no point, you and all the other CCL madcaps are convinced beyond doubt... it would be as futile as trying to convince a doorknocking Jehovas Witness that
their brand of religion isnt the correct one.
Sportianity, as
this brand of religion might best be called, is thoroughly evangelistic, using sport as an advertising medium.
Your particular
brand of religion is just an adjective..
When the religious run things they force everyone to practice
their brand of religion, when you have a secular society everyone gets to pick their own religion and practice it as much or as little as they want as long as they do not prevent someone else from doing the same.
Amid the mounting tensions and complexity of our computerized society, more and more people seek a simple, positive, authoritarian
brand of religion.
Evangelicals was state - sponsored
their brand of religion - heaven help all of us.
Not to mention that for gays not of
your brand of religion it is not a sin as they are not subject to your religious bigotry,
Dear Sally — Hom ose xuality is not a sin for people that do not follow
your brand of religion.
Many of these same people bring children into the world at a high pace, and then would prefer that the rest of society take over and educate their children in their particular
brand of religion when they don't plan well.
That being said, my sincerest hope is that he is the last one pushing
this brand of religion.
This is one of the reasons the Founding Fathers wanted to build a country where the government was of and by the people instead of
any brand of religion.
We are constantly surprised at how many of the street people, the people in the margins know the real deal (Jesus followers) from what I call the «religious folks» who are selling
their brand of religion and whatever comes with it.
Maybe if Christian churches quit peddling their right - wing
brand of religion and go back to the true teaching of Christ and actually followed what he taught, then maybe the younger generation would turn back.
He believes he (or his particular
brand of religion) is the arbitrator and solution to man's spiritual quest and that any deviation from his proscribed beliefs is anathema.
A hoard of Christians would drive by it smugly nodding their hypocritical heads in agreement, never once considering that the argument would apply to their oh so special
brand of religion as well.
I didn't even read it because the first line gives away the flawed premise of this article: people who are «spiritual» are missing something by not subscribing to a particular
brand of religion.
-- Soooo, forcing everyone on a public train to listen to
your brand of religion is a right?
If they are blind enough to do it, at least have the same respect for others that you want for your «flavor of the week»
brand of religion.
In America, marriage does not have to be a religious event, and quoting from your religious text has no persuasive effect on those who don't follow your particular
brand of religion.
Many of these same people bring children into the world at a high pace, and then would prefer that the rest of society take over and educate their children in their particular
brand of religion when they don't plan well and don't want to violate their beliefs.
Instead, they broadcast, hour after hour,
the brand of religion that suits them, and nothing more.
They instead seek to impose their particular
brand of religion on all of us by making it the law of the land.
I believe that the Christ had some choice words for them and
their brand of religion.
Is CNN trying to promote a new
brand of religion where anything goes.
The more I see of fundies, the more I am certain that
their brand of religion is actually a mental disorder.
If what you say is true, then why is it that I see billboards, roadside signs, TV, print and onlineadvertisements EVERY day in which religious groups try to force their particular
brand of religion on everyone, yet on the rare occasion that an atheist does the same, it makes national news.
A church is perfectly within its rights to refuse to recognize any marriage, and unless you believe in that church's
brand of religion, it is inconsequential.
The whole story about some god punishing a person for all of eternity for not believing in your particular
brand of religion might scare a child enought to believe but most adults are way past such a silly concept.
And many nations have waged wars to promote their particular
brand of religion.
Remember your religious rules do not apply to people who do not follow your particular
brand of religion.
Without intending any any disrespect to your contention, I wonder how the use of a school building by a religious group at a time or day when students and teachers are not using it is likely to result in a situation in which the «religious group becomes identified with the school, which appears to be promoting that
brand of religion».
By analog, If a religious group holds an event or service at a hotel or convention centre, in return for its paying a fee, should one then think that the hotel or convention centre is «promoting
that brand of religion»?
Without a doubt there are
brands of religion, including Christianity, which does desire to exert influence on the whole public.
And it is Steve P again commenting on other people's bigotry while not revealing his own prejudices for the various
brands of religion out there!!!!
And it is Steve P again commenting on other people's bigotry while not revealing his own prejudices for the various
brands of religion out there!!!! One assumes he is an agnostic which is some ways makes him intolerant towards all religions even though his comments always drip with compassion for the various religions out there..
Not exact matches
Funny, I'm an atheist who thinks that his «
brand»
of christian
religion is dumb lies (just as dumb as the lies from any other), yet his believe is the very last thing on my list
of questions.
The religious right (
of all
religions) see it as a race to gain the most political power sotheir
brand of «good» is the only one reflected in law.
Religion «Feather T - Shirt» in white with large photographic feather's graphic and «
RELIGION»
branding on the front
of the t - shirt.
Finally, it is very very evangelical movement, so it requires a large school
of apologetics many
of which, like any
religion in with new converts are highly zealous and incredibly hostile towards anything outside
of the boarders
of their particular
brand of faith.
''... they protest «rigid
religion,» objecting to a certain
brand of conservatism that insists there is only one way to express spirituality, faith, and the search for transcendence... So why, then, is it «good news» that there is a huge rise in the «spiritual but not religious»?
On one hand, they protest «rigid
religion,» objecting to a certain
brand of conservatism that insists there is only one way to express spirituality, faith, and the search for transcendence.
It must be remembered that
religion (s) are one
of the largest service industries on earth and millions
of people make their living off
of peddling their particular
brand, including the author
of the article (what earthly use is a professor
of theology).
«To know a person's
religion we need not listen to his profession
of faith but must find his
brand of intolerance.»
A certain segment
of the population has taken this word — describing a broad spectrum
of religion different than say, Buddhism, Judaism, Hindu, or Islam — and turned it into crypto - speak for their own sub-sect
brand of snake handling.
But, do you not feel that your
religion is superior to Islam, Judaism, other faiths and even other
brands of Christianity?
The shorts feature a concealed zip, a raw hem and
RELIGION branding on the back
of the waistband.
The shorts feature a concealed zip, a raw hem and
RELIGION branding on the back right side
of the waistband.
It took a while, but after stripping away the «superficial language
of religion,»
Brand decided to connect with the higher power at the root
of the 12 steps.
There are thousands
of branded religions out there, and the fact that your parents had one
of them handed down to them, and they are handing it down to you, carries no weight whatsoever that their
religion is the right one and the thousands
of others are wrong.