49 (D. Mass. 1997)(plaintiff without remedy due to ERISA's preemption of state law
breach of contract claims where the decedent was in need of detoxification and rehabilitation benefits).
Not exact matches
75A -(1) If the debtor under a linked credit agreement has a
claim against the supplier in respect
of a
breach of contract the debtor may pursue that
claim against the creditor
where any
of the conditions in subsection (2) are met.
However,
where an employer prematurely
claims frustration
of the employment
contract and terminates the employment relationship on that basis, the employee will be found to have been wrongfully dismissed, and will be entitled to common law reasonable notice as well as damages for a
breach of the Code.
What is also unique about this case is that the person identified as the RateMDs poster was involved in different lawsuit on the other side
of Dr. Foda in Foda v. Capital Health Region, [2007] A.J. No. 22; 2007 ABQB 19,
where he was making a
claim for
breach of contract, conspiracy, harassment, defamation, and direct interference with economic relations.
However, my textbook says there is one major distinction between the two, and it is: «in a case
of waiver, the party waiving their rights is really only waiving the right to
claim damgaes for
breach of contract, or to terminate for breah
where applicable.
The case in question, Ivey v Genting [2017] UKSC 67, decided on 25th October 2017, did not concern dishonesty in the contexts
where it might normally arise, e.g. the criminal law, dishonest assistance in
breach of trust or a fraud
claim, but in the context
of a conceded contractual implied term in a gaming
contract that the gambler would not «cheat» at the card game
of Punto Banco.
We obtained summary judgment in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania
where the court found in favor
of the insurance carrier on a
breach of contract and statutory bad faith
claim filed by its insured.
Prior to joining Lewis Wagner, Meghan was an associate in the New York firm Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry's insurance coverage group,
where she represented insurance company clients in insurance coverage litigation, and advised insurers on exposure and liability issues in wide array
of tort and commercial contexts, including mass tort and class action litigation involving pharmaceuticals, chemical, transportation, news and entertainment, and oil and gas; environmental suits; FDA compliance
claims; unfair competition and false advertising
claims; intellectual property
claims; construction defect; personal injury; product liability; and associated
breach of contract claims.
Obtained a defense verdict on a
breach of contract claim, and summary judgment on thirteen other counts in a case
where the plaintiff sought $ 400 million.
Douglas LaSota is a member
of the firm's Professional Liability Department
where he focuses a portion
of his practice in the defense
of construction and engineering professionals and businesses in complex construction and design defect
claims,
breach of contract actions, and all manner
of construction accidents.
His work involves advice in relation to M&A and restructuring, and litigation in the High Court and employment tribunals
where he has successfully represented clients on significant
breach of contract, unfair dismissal and discrimination
claims.
(1) Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Ors; Brit UW Ltd & Ors v Starlight & Ors; Brit UW & Ors v Imperial Marine & Ors [2011] EWHC 3381 (Comm); [2012] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 608; [2012] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 162; [2012] 1 C.L.C. 100 — summary judgment on
claims by insurers against assured for
breach of a settlement agreement and
of jurisdiction agreements in the settlement and in the underlying policy
of insurance — constitution
of a fund from which to indemnify insurers against future loss and damage resulting from continuation
of the foreign proceedings
where no anti suit injunction could be granted due to Turner v Grovit and Front Comor — refusal
of discretionary stay in favour
of Greek court under Article 28
where stay would condone
breach of contract.
They can only be
claimed, however,
where the parties have put a clause in the
contract setting out what the damages are to be, and
where the amount represents a genuine pre-estimate
of the loss ex-pected to be suffered in the event
of breach.
As to the latter, Hasham v Zenab [1960] AC 316, [1960] 2 WLR 374 shows that specific performance might be decreed even
where no
claim for
breach of contract had (yet) arisen and the Court
of Appeal in P&O Nedlloyd held that it was therefore wrong in principle to regard specific performance — as Mr Justice Colman had done at first instance — as being no more than an equitable remedy for an existing
breach of contract.
Prior to joining Woodsford, Helena spent time at London law firm Harcus Sinclair LLP,
where she worked on a large shareholder
claim arising from the acquisition
of a commercial bank, as well as trust disputes and
claims in respect
of misrepresentation and
breach of contract.
Rouleau JA held in Gauthier that
where elements
of a
breach of contract or a
claim in negligence are pleaded properly the Superior Court
of Justice does have jurisdiction to even hear
claims that are academic in nature.
He also accepted that the second letter was negligent in not explaining the options to Levicom clearly enough and for giving a misleading impression in relation to the prospects
of Levicom succeeding in the arbitration in a
claim for declaratory relief against the Swedish companies (
where the chances
of success in establishing a
breach of contract were stated as «in the region
of, but not less than, 70 %»), rather than concentrating on how to quantify and make a
claim for substantial damages.
They held that the parties to the employment
contract did not intend that common law damages would be available for a
breach of the contractually prescribed disciplinary process
where that
breach occurred during the steps leading to dismissal and, applying Johnson, the common law
claims were barred.
That is not so in the case
of breach of contract claims,
where it is the SGP which applies.
Is service
of a statutory demand a proper course
where there is a well established
claim for
breach of contract worth at least # 750 in general damages, but there is a substantial dispute about whether the
claim has a value
of much more than # 750?
Harvard Associates, Ltd. v. Hayt, Hayt & Landau (238 A.D. 2d 378)- summary judgment to dismiss broker's
claim for
breach of contract denied
where issue
of fact exists as to whether or not broker was the procuring cause
of re-negotiated lease;
contract provision obligates the party to protect and preserve the broker's right to recover any earned commission from the owner.