A party is not entitled to enjoin the breach of a contract by another, unless he himself has performed what the contract requires of him so far as possible; if he himself is in default or has given cause for nonperformance by defendant, he has no standing in equity... Having committed the first breach, the general rule is that a material
breach of the Agreement allows the non-breaching party to treat the breach as a discharge of his contract liability.
Not exact matches
You may not do any
of the following while accessing or using the Services: (i) access, tamper with, or use non-public areas
of the Services, fanatix's computer systems, or the technical delivery systems
of fanatix's providers; (ii) probe, scan, or test the vulnerability
of any system or network or
breach or circumvent any security or authentication measures; (iii) access or search or attempt to access or search the Services by any means (automated or otherwise) other than through our currently available, published interfaces that are provided by fanatix (and only pursuant to those terms and conditions), unless you have been specifically
allowed to do so in a separate
agreement with Fanatix (NOTE: crawling the Services is permissible if done in accordance with the provisions
of the robots.txt file, however, scraping the Services without the prior consent
of fanatix is expressly prohibited); (iv) forge any TCP / IP packet header or any part
of the header information in any email or posting, or in any way use the Services to send altered, deceptive or false source - identifying information; or (v) interfere with, or disrupt, (or attempt to do so), the access
of any user, host or network, including, without limitation, sending a virus, overloading, flooding, spamming, mail - bombing the Services, or by scripting the creation
of Content in such a manner as to interfere with or create an undue burden on the Services.
One
of the main and more principled sources
of opposition was the inclusion
of ICS in CETA, a judicial mechanism that
allows foreign investors to sue governments over a
breach of investor rights contained in the
agreement.
Allianz's position on appeal was that reg 44/2001 provides that, when the court
of one European member state becomes seised
of a matter, all other European courts must not
allow the same matter to proceed until the court first seised has ruled, even if the proceedings first seised have purportedly been brought in
breach of a jurisdiction
agreement.
The DoJ, meanwhile, obtains an admission
of unlawful conduct (
allowing relatively straightforward prosecution in the event that the company is in
breach of the conditions
of the
agreement) without going through the rigors
of obtaining an indictment and bringing the case to court.
Sometimes such an essential elements clause is linked to a non-execution clause (see this informative piece by Lorand Bartels on the issue) which explicitly
allows a Party to suspend (part
of) or terminate an
agreement for a material
breach.
One could argue therefore that even if there is no explicit provision authorising the Parties to suspend the
agreement for a
breach of a provision in Chapter 13, it is undeniable that the
agreement allows for termination (and implicitly suspension) generally.
The fact that the EUSFTA does not explicitly
allow for cross-suspension (for instance, suspending the reduced tariff rates for certain categories
of imported goods in the event
of a
breach of one
of the environmental provisions), did not deter the Court from finding that a
breach of Chapter 13 could constitute a material
breach of the Treaty and therefore authorising the Parties to suspend the
agreement under international treaty law.
Our Vancouver separation
agreement lawyers know that a party who
breaches (refuses to follow) a Vancouver separation
agreement can be the subject
of a claim for damages for breaking the deal that can also include being ordered to comply with the terms
of the deal or
allowing the other party to exercise the right to make claims that were waived under the original Vancouver separation
agreement.
Concluding that Experian had
breached the
agreement with BDC, Hainey therefore
allowed BDC's claim for damages arising from Experian's fraudulent misrepresentations and assessed damages in the amount
of $ 44,447,416 plus pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, signaling that Ontario courts have no sympathy for fraudulent vendors that seek to abuse fair procurement processes.
Injunctive relief
allows a Disclosing Party to prevent or stop a Recipient from disclosing confidential information in
breach of this
agreement.
Taking a more academic approach, professors Stephen Bainbridge and Larry Ribstein in respective posts here and here suggest that expelling partners like Mayer did isn't a
breach of contract if the firm's partnership
agreement had a «guillotine» provision
allowing it to cut partners at any time without cause.
The appellant argued that these findings were made despite the trial judge having refused to
allow the appellant to amend its claim to allege that West Face had induced the vendor
of the WIND shares to
breach its
agreement with the appellant in the course
of those August dealings.
If alimony was set through a separation
agreement that
allows for termination upon cohabitation, you may be able to stop paying and then raise cohabitation as a defense when your former spouse sues you for
breach of the
agreement.
In fact, the vast majority
of new home or condominium - purchase
agreements do not
allow the original buyer to assign the contract to someone else and stipulate that any attempt by the buyer to do so, or to list the home for sale on the MLS system or otherwise, or else list the property for rent, will put the original buyer in
breach of the
agreement.
The truth is most Sales Rep to Brokerage contracts are changeable in some ways that
allow the sale rep to protect their business without asking the brokerage to
breach their franchise
agreement with their brand
of choice.
73 DOS 95 Matter
of DOS v. Marotta - consolidation
of actions; dual agency; disgorgement
of broker commission; broker may act concurrently in a single transaction as an agent and a principal with informed consent
of and full disclosure to principal; broker's
agreement breached by broker where broker obtained property incompatible with client's stated needs; no broker's fee earned where brokerage
agreement breached by broker; broker engaging in business under trade name acts as individual; agency created between broker and buyer by conduct
of parties; dual agency
allowed upon full disclosure and informed consent
of both buyer and seller; no commission earned by broker where
breach of fiduciary duty; refund unearned commissions
79 DOS 99 Matter
of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure
of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice
of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof
of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration
of respondents» licenses as acts
of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing
agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing
agreement without mandatory definitions
of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker
breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker
breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing
agreements providing for broker to retain one half
of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms,
allow broker to retain part
of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice
of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale
of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval
of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms
of the listing
agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts
of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase
agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase
agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit
of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope
of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof
of payment
of sum
of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained