Not exact matches
Changes to competition laws (milk wars discussion and recommendations
relating to MMP (introduce effects test), predatory pricing (recommend Minister direct ACCC to investigate Coles for
breach of s 46
relating to predatory pricing), unconscionable conduct (suggest it be defined), statutory duty
of good faith, unfair contract terms (seeks «recognition
of the competitive disadvantage faced by farmers» and extension
of unfair contract terms protection to small business), collective bargaining (seeks relaxation
of public interest test for boycott approvals in agriculture markets, increase «ability for peak bodies to commence and progress collective bargaining and boycott applications» on behalf
of members - and further dairy specific recommendations, ACCC divestiture power (wants ACCC to have similar divestiture powers to Comp Commission in UK - «simpler process
of divestiture», ACCC monitoring powers (wants Minister to direct ACCC to use price monitoring powers to «monitor prices, costs and profits
relating to the supply
of drinking milk») and mandatory
code of conduct (wants mandatory
code and «Ombudsman with teeth to ensure compliance»)-RRB-.
«It is my view therefore that, it is the CHRAJ that is the institution vested with the exclusive constitutional authority to deal with all relevant matters
relating to
breach of code of conduct
of public officers including this matter on the receipt
of the Ford expedition vehicle.
You and Velocity Micro agree that any claim, dispute, or controversy, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable claims («Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or
relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the
breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any
related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its
Code of Procedure then in effect.
The parties agree that any controversy or claim arising out
of or
relating to this Agreement, or the
breach thereof, will be settled by binding arbitration in accordance with California
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280 et seq., and the then current rules and procedures
of the American Arbitration Association.
Binding Arbitration: ANY CLAIM, DISPUTE, OR CONTROVERSY (WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE, WHETHER PREEXISTING, PRESENT OR FUTURE, AND INCLUDING STATUTORY, COMMON LAW, INTENTIONAL TORT AND EQUITABLE CLAIMS) BETWEEN CLIENT AND Mulcoy Travel, its respective agents, employees, principals, successors, assigns, or affiliates arising from or
relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the
breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not parties to these terms and conditions), Mulcoy Travel's advertising, or any
related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (AAA) under its
Code of Procedure then in effect.
Given that Botony
breached its obligations, the Court considered what an appropriate remedy might be under the Human Rights
Code, which prohibits employment -
related discrimination on the basis
of «family status.»
Similar activities from other judges and attorneys have resulted in violations
of both the
Code of Professional Conduct and the
Code of Judicial Conduct, from unauthorized practice
of law across state lines and
breaching attorney - client privilege to posting inappropriate comments and sending friend requests to litigants and
related attorneys.
He litigates in multiple areas
of employment law and defends against individual and class action lawsuits alleging violations
of wage and hour laws, discrimination, wrongful termination, harassment,
breach of contract, labor
code section 132a claims, and other
related matters.
seek to introduce contractual rights to request compliance -
related information and the right to audit in our high risk supplier contracts together with warranties and the right to terminate for
breach of our Supplier
Code
Although Menchaca is not a case involving payment
of an appraisal award, the Texas Supreme Court used it to provide clarity regarding the relationship between claims for an insurance policy
breach and Insurance
Code violations and applied five rules governing how claims under the policy and claims under the statute
relate.
Cases
related to
breaches to the
Code of Ethics go to a disciplinary hearing.