Sentences with phrase «breach of the order»

That means they will constantly be in breach of some order or another.

The sanctions for breach of the order are provided by the law on contempt of court.

In Soil Instruments Ltd v Mr Robert King Mason, His Honour Judge Bird, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, considered whether Mr King Mason should be committed to prison for alleged breaches of an Order made by Mrs Justice May on 26th July 2017, concerning the use of confidential information under a restrictive covenant.

Home Office figures released today showed a decrease in the number of Asbos issued, but also revealed an increase in breaches of the orders from 47 per cent in 2000 - 2005 to 49 per cent in 2006.

The CJC says there is growing concern about the way such injunctions are being sought and / or used; the powers afforded to the courts (principally the county court, although the youth court can grant civil injunctions against juveniles); the limited powers available to the county court on breach; whether third parties should be involved in the process, and whether breaches of these orders are then a shortcut to mandatory possession orders.

First, the claimant filed a costs budget 45 minutes late in breach of an order which made express reference to the automatic sanctions in CPR r 3.14.

Breach of an order carries up to five years» imprisonment.

PCLB Criminal Lawyers can give you good advice on how to go about cancelling the order, otherwise you can still be tried for breach of the order if you breach the terms.

In addition to dealing with the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to the alleged breach of the order, we are assisting the client in responding to FSA concerns regarding the client's systems and controls

Note: If you invite your spouse to the house you will be inducing a breach of the order and the police may not enforce it.

It is a criminal offence to breach any of these Orders and the police have powers to arrest a person for breaching a Non-Molestation Order.

The court held the judge had been right to regard the breaches of orders as serious, and to impose 12 months for punitive, and 12 months for coercive, measures.

However, she was found not to be in breach of the order, even though she had already apologised to the court.

In relation to the first question, counsel for the bank argued that there was no breach of the order because the nature of the defendant's asset with the bank was simply a debt owed by the bank to him.

Breach of that order can be enforced by committal.

Jackson LJ referred to the amendment of CPR Rule 3.9, which toughens up the courts» approach to unjustified delays and breaches of orders, stating that his recommendation was made in response to calls for «firmer sanctions» from both claimant and defendant PI lawyers.

Lord Justice Jackson referred back to his Recommendation 86 in his Final Report (p 469) in which he said that «the courts should be less tolerant than hitherto of unjustified delays and breaches of orders.