Sentences with phrase «breach of the privacy rights»

The plaintiffs seek to sue the Bank and Wilson for damages, including a breach of their privacy rights through the tort of «intrusion upon seclusion».

It is also a breach of the privacy rights of bargaining unit members, and is inimical to the concept of dignity.

I would also award exemplary damages of $ 10,000 for Bell's conduct at the time of the breach of the privacy rights and thereafter.

Not exact matches

You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless NBCUniversal, its affiliates and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, as well as any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable legal fees and costs) arising out of or accruing from (a) any breach of these terms, including any of the foregoing provisions, representations or warranties, and / or from your placement or transmission of any content onto NBCUniversal's servers, and / or from any and all use of your account; (b) any material posted or otherwise provided by you (including without limitation User Content), or any other subscriber or user of your account that infringes any intellectual property right of any person or entity or defames any person or violates their rights of publicity or privacy; (c) any misrepresentation made by you in connection with your use of the online services; and (d) any breach of any of the representation, warranties or other terms or conditions relating to use of your User Content or the online services.

The Competition Tribunal appeal hearing between The Commissioner of Competition and The Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB) began Monday in the Federal Court of Appeal with TREB once again arguing that clients» privacy rights will be breached if certain data is exposed on the Internet on virtual office websites (VOWs).

I fully indemnify, defend and hold harmless Car Throttle (and any third parties authorised by Car Throttle using or exploiting the Content), their respective officers, employees, successors, licensees and permitted assigns from and against: (a) any costs, claim, demand, action, damages, loss and / or expense arising from actions brought by any third parties arising from any breach of any of the representations, warranties or agreements made by you; (b) any claims of or respecting slander, libel, defamation, invasion of privacy or right of publicity, false light, infringement of copyright or trademark, or violations of any other rights arising out of or relating to any use of the Content as authorised herein.

Belobaba ultimately sided with the challengers, writing that the act breached the privacy provisions granted by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Deciding that the wrongs done to the claimants might possibly represent a breach of their qualified human rights (privacy) but probably not their absolute rights (degrading treatment) he decided that the human rights claims should be heard first before the IPT, which is where Ripa insists such cases should go.

The ruling by the EU's highest court that such bulk storage of metadata is, in itself, an unjustified and disproportionate invasion of privacy and a breach of human rights is thus a vindication of our stance.

By submitting User Materials to or using the Site, you represent that you have the full legal right to provide the User Materials, that such User Materials will not: (a) divulge any protected health information or infringe any intellectual property rights of any person or entity or any rights of publicity, personality, or privacy of any person or entity, including without limitation as a result of your failure to obtain consent to post personally identifying or otherwise private information about a person or which impersonates another person; (b) violate any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation; (c) be defamatory, libelous or trade libelous, unlawfully threatening, or unlawfully harassing or embarrassing; (d) be obscene, child pornographic, or indecent; (e) violate any community or Internet standard; (f) contain any viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, cancelbots, or other computer programming routines that damage, detrimentally interfere with, surreptitiously intercept, or expropriate any system, data or personal information, or that facilitate or enable such or that are intended to do any of the foregoing; (g) result in product liability, tort, breach of contract, personal injury, death, or property damage; (h) constitute misappropriation of any trade secret or know - how; or (i) constitute disclosure of any confidential information owned by any third party.

We may also disclose your personal information to third parties if we have reason to believe that disclosing such information is necessary to: (i) conduct investigations of possible breaches of law; (ii) cooperate in any legal investigation; (iii) identify, contact, or bring legal action against someone who may be violating the Terms of Use of this websites; or (iv) to protect our rights, privacy, safety or property.

Please refer to ASIC's privacy policy for information about how ASIC handles personal information, your rights to seek access to and correct personal information and how to complain about breaches of your privacy by ASIC.

For updates on security breaches, see the Web sites of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse and the Identity Theft Resource Center.

You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services, the Sites or any Materials therein to take any actions that: (i) infringe on PetSmart Charities» or any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual or proprietary rights, or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, constitute discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, gender, sex, disability or other protected grounds, or are pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on PetSmart Charities or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices, or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate any applicable «anti-spam» legislation, including that commonly referred to as «CASL»; (vii) would be or encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national or international laws or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interference with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of PetSmart Charities» or another party's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other account users or attempt to gain access to other account users» accounts or otherwise mine information about other account users or the Sites, or interfere with any other user's ability to access or use the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) in PetSmart Charities» sole discretion, are contrary to PetSmart Charities» public image, goodwill, reputation or mission, or otherwise not in furtherance of our Vision of a lifelong, loving home for every pet.

You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.

x) information or material which you have submitted to TravelGround.com which is in violation of any law or in breach of any third party's rights (including, but not limited to, defamation, invasion of privacy, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright or any other intellectual property rights).

Lucas has litigated a variety of matters, including actions for breach of contract, interference torts, unfair business practices, misappropriation, copyright and trademark infringement, profit participation claims, idea submission claims, and media torts including defamation, invasion of privacy, right of publicity and misappropriation of name and likeness in all media, including the Internet.

My note mentioned a provision of the rules of procedure of the tribunal that barred evidence that violated fundamental rights (of anybody, apparently), and a section of the Manitoba Privacy Act that bars the use in any civil proceeding of any evidence obtained by a breach of privacy as defined in tPrivacy Act that bars the use in any civil proceeding of any evidence obtained by a breach of privacy as defined in tprivacy as defined in the Act.

In Nissenbaum's view, when information about individuals flows in a manner consistent with its contextual norm, «contextual integrity» — and those individuals» privacy rights — are considered to have been preserved, but if that information flows in a manner inconsistent with that norm, contextual integrity — and thus the privacy rights of those individuals — are considered to have been breached.

Before the domestic courts and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Mr Marper and S complained that retention of their DNA breached their right to privacy under Art 8 of the Convention and, further, that such a breach was discriminatory pursuant to Art 14.

Phone hacking is clearly a breach of an individual's privacy, and even in the UK this sort of snooping goes beyond the public's right to know.

Even before the S.C. data breach, the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse identified 18 data breaches in October involving the compromise of tens of thousands of Social Security numbers.

Mr. Baker has experience in all areas of the litigation process in commercial disputes involving false advertising claims, trademark and trade dress infringement claims, copyright infringement claims, data privacy claims, patent infringement claims, art ownership and acquisition claims, trade secrets, right of publicity / privacy claims, consumer protection statute claims, and breach of contract claims.

On January 25, 2013, the Office of Civil Rights published the Final Rule to implement modifications to HIPAA Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification rules.1 The basis for the imposition of a civil money penalty was revised to include business associates.

The Alberta Information and Privacy Commissioner recently confirmed that Alberta Health Services (AHS) breached the rights of one of its employees by intentionally using information from his addiction counselling against him during a human resources investigation.

The point on damages was the effect of the EU Privacy Directive that required a remedy for a breach of fundamental rights.

The English courts will have exclusive jurisdiction over any claim arising from, or related to, a visit to our Site or any aspect relating to use of your data under the Privacy and Cookies Policy although we retain the right to bring proceedings against you for breach of these conditions in your country of residence or any other relevant country.

The Information Commissioner's Office, which is responsible for upholding information rights and data privacy, with the ability to impose penal sanctions for breach, strongly recommends that organisations determine which of their systems are vulnerable, and apply any available patches as a matter of urgency.

«Had the Employer described to a work group a physician's diagnosis of a co-worker, that it had obtained in its role as employer, disclosure would clearly be a breach of the employee's right to privacy of their personal medical information.

The clandestine recording of sexual activity on private property engages Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and may constitute an actionable breach of privacy.

At issue is whether the RCMP was authorized to send material from the case on to the law firm acting on behalf of Massa or whether it breached Alex Sualim's right to privacy when it did so.

The association argued that there were two breaches of the grievor's privacy rights.

Many of his cases arise from breach of contract, copyright and trademark infringement, right of publicity, false advertising, intermediary liability (DMCA and CDA § 230), privacy, defamation, IP licensing and chain of title matters.

I specialise in reputation management claims (including defamation, harassment and privacy claims) and intellectual property disputes (including trade mark, copyright and design right infringement claims, breach of confidence claims and domain name disputes).

In respect to the driver (Belnavis), the majority found that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of the vehicle and that there had been a breach of her Charter rights.

In the wake of the Facebook, Cambridge Analytica breach, the GDPR will trigger an overarching privacy framework that increases territorial scope of European data protections including a stronger «right to be forgotten» and stringent consent requirements.

If it was a past course of conduct (unlawful detention, intrusion into privacy, unacceptable pollution), they may award damages for human rights breaches.

Connecticut business litigation lawyer & attorney Neyah Kane Bennett of Aeton Law Partners LLP, offering services for non-compete agreements, breach of contract, interference with contracts, severance packages, home improvement lawsuits, partnership and business disputes, cyber liability, privacy laws, data loss, technology errors, domain name disputes, defamation, slander, trade secrets, non-disclosure agreement, copyright infringement, software licensing, shareholder rights, business fraud, uniform commercial code, serving Hartford, Middletown, Glastonbury, East Hartford, Manchester, Wethersfield, Windsor, South Windsor, New Haven, Waterbury, Meriden, Rocky Hill, Berlin, Enfield, Bloomfield, New Britain, Southington, Bolton, Vernon, Rockville, New London, Milford, Bridgeport, West Hartford and the state of Connecticut.

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada is reported to be investigating whether an Ottawa woman's privacy was breached by an investigator from the Canada Human Rights Commission who used the woman's unsecured wireless network to visit and post on white supremacist wePrivacy Commissioner of Canada is reported to be investigating whether an Ottawa woman's privacy was breached by an investigator from the Canada Human Rights Commission who used the woman's unsecured wireless network to visit and post on white supremacist weprivacy was breached by an investigator from the Canada Human Rights Commission who used the woman's unsecured wireless network to visit and post on white supremacist websites.

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently held in a criminal case that an employee's privacy rights under s. 8 of the Charter were breached when the police used a copy of the temporary internet files on the employee's laptop provided by the employer.

In January, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed the existence of a new common law right of action for breach of privacy in Jones v. Tsige.

In her complaint, her attorneys have argued that, «The adultery law constitutes a serious breach of the individual's rights to make decisions concerning sex and privacy under the constitution.

Some of the most common are wrongful termination, discrimination, retaliation, violations of the Family Medical Leave Act, violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Violations of the California Family Rights Act, privacy breaches (e.g. disclosure of a medical condition to someone who did not need to know), contract breaches, unfair bargaining and / or union and labor law disputes, unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked, failure to provide proper pay stubs, failure to pay for unused vacation days upon resignation or termination, failure to pay for all hours worked within 72 hours of quitting, failure to pay for all hours worked immediately upon leaving when the employee gives fair notice or resignation to the employer, failure to keep adequate records, failure to produce employment records upon request, failure to provide wage and pay information upon hiring, misclassification of an hourly employee as an exempt employee, misclassification of an hourly employee as an independent contractor, work place bullying, sexual harassment, disparate impact, disparate treatment, class actions for failure to pay wages and over time, class actions for failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and class actions for failure to reimburse employees for expenses.

These included a new power to impose fines for serious privacy breaches (up to $ 1m for organisations and $ 100,000 for individuals), protection for individuals against re-identification of information, the introduction of data portability as a consumer right, and reform of the outdated public register privacy principles.

Some argued a new tort was not necessary as many aspects of privacy were already protected by other causes of action like breach of confidence, defamation, breach of copyright, nuisance, and various property rights.

The Commissioner's office (IPC) conducted a major investigation into whether the privacy rights of prospective jurors were breached when the police, on behalf of Crown attorneys, conducted background checks through a variety of means, ranging from accessing confidential databases, to informally gathering anecdotal information.

She has also advised clients subject to regulatory investigations and litigation involving a spectrum of federal and state laws, including under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), Gramm - Leach - Bliley Act (GLBA), state data breach notification laws, California Online Privacy Protection Act (CalOPPA) and others.

Rupert is currently acting in two of The Lawyer's Top 20 Cases of 2017, namely Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (US$ 4bn Commercial Court claim against the UK Government for breach of A1P1 ECHR rights loss caused by unlawful sanctions) and Various Claimants v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc (high - value group litigation privacy / Data Protection Act claim against Morrisons following employee data breach).

Mosley v UK: «Max Mosley has lost his case in the European Court of Human Rights, in which he claimed that the UK breached his right to respect for private life under article 8 of the ECHR by failing to impose a legal duty on the media to notify him in advance of a story that violated his privacy....»

Increasingly cases brought by celebrities against media companies are presented as breaches of their privacy or data protection rights.»