Sentences with phrase «breach of warranty cases»

Though product liability actions may be brought as negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty cases, product liability actions seeking compensation for a victim's personal injury or death are generally brought as strict liability actions.

Legal Teams: A Group Approach — Working together to tackle lemon law and breach of warranty cases.

Not exact matches

You agree to reimburse each Square Enix Party (as defined in section 3.2 above) in full for the amount of any and all claims, proceedings, actions, demands, damages, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses suffered or incurred by such Square Enix Party, in each case as a result of or in connection with: (a) any breach of any of your obligations, warranties, representations or undertakings under the Site Terms; and / or (b) any illegal use of your Membership or Account by any person (s).

Possible legal theories that can be argued in a products liability case include negligence (lack of reasonable care in the manufacture or sale of the product or in warning about the product), breach of warranty (failure to fulfill the terms of a promise regarding the product's performance), misrepresentation (giving consumers a false sense of security about a product's safety), and strict liability (under which the product's defect, although not the fault of the defendant, rendered the product unreasonably dangerous and the defendant is therefore responsible).

Breach of warranty is yet another type of claim used in product liability cases.

A track record of success Employing both substantive and legal defenses, our attorneys have successfully resolved high - profile cases involving health care, consumer fraud, unfair business practices, breach of warranty, and food and beverage labeling, among others.

Products liability cases use one of three legal theories: negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty.

Warranty and indemnity Insurance covers losses arising from breach of a warranty (or in certain cases under an indemnity) given in connection with an M&A transaction thus facilitating... ContinueWarranty and indemnity Insurance covers losses arising from breach of a warranty (or in certain cases under an indemnity) given in connection with an M&A transaction thus facilitating... Continuewarranty (or in certain cases under an indemnity) given in connection with an M&A transaction thus facilitating... Continue reading

Obtained favorable ruling from North Carolina Supreme Court on behalf of safety equipment company in an electrocution case, which confirmed the defense of contributory negligence in breach of warranty matters in North Carolina.

Food poisoning cases generally fall under one of three categories; negligence, strict products liability, or breach of warranty.

In addition to strict liability claims, victims may also bring standard negligence cases or sue under a breach of warranty (e.g. the warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose).

Defended global electronics company against claims of fraud and breach of warranty brought in a high - profile case in state court

The cases in which Paul has been involved cover a wide range of issues including policy construction under both English and New York law, proof of loss, breach of warranty claims, choice of law, misrepresentation and non-disclosure, and the allocation of historical and progressive losses.

Benefit from experienced practitioners that have distinguished themselves in important landmark cases on issues such as financial assistance, minority oppression, breach of directors» fiduciary duties, breach of warranties and share buy out valuation.

Jim has been lead counsel in a wide variety of complex civil litigation, including cases involving breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, conspiracy, anti-trust, deceptive trade, insurance code violations, partnership disputes, corporate governance / ownership disputes, breach of express and implied warranty / covenants, RICO, sexual harassment, constitutional claims, assault, battery, libel, slander, trespass, nuisance, product defect and negligence.

Does South Carolina's public policy bar impaired drivers from recovering damages in a crashworthiness case when the plaintiff alleges claims of strict liability and breach of warranty?

General practitioners can also be helpful to individuals who need basic legal documents drafted like in the case of an uncomplicated sale of a house, for a lemon law case, or for a breach of warranty claim.

These cases include significant multimillion dollar claims involving breach of contract, deficiency claims, delay claims, liquidated damages claims, warranty and tendering issues.

Recovery in a product liability case in Virginia is dependent on either proving negligence or establishing a case for breach of warranty.

Regardless of the circumstances causing the injury, if you receive a personal injury in Virginia Beach — or anywhere else in Virginia — and the injury may have been caused by a defective product, a product liability case will be complex and difficult to prove on the basis of either negligence or breach of warranty.

In product liability cases in Virginia, a seller or installer also may be held liable for breach of warranty.

The laws in each state are different, but in general, there are four theories that drive most product liability cases: Negligence, Breach of Warranty, Misrepresentation and Strict Liability.

Proceedings for breaches of the warranties and deceit would have been issued some four years earlier than they were in this case, because of the intervening criminal trial.

We can help you with breach of contract and warranty cases, disputes over the proper construction of agreements, shareholder disputes, disputes over joint ventures, and post-mergers and acquisitions disputes, as well as with corporate governance related litigation, for example shareholder activism battles, disputes on public take - over bids and squeeze - out procedures.

The court ruled that the second - hand smoke in this case constituted a nuisance and the Landlords failure to abate a known nuisance resulted in a breach of the warranty of habitability, resulting in a constructive eviction of the Tenant.