Sentences with phrase «breaches of the code which»

Material breaches of the code which are not serious or persistent — which are not a breach of r 15 but may be evidence of inadequate professional services; and

Further, if there were implied into the retainer a term that the solicitor would comply with the code then Morgan J held «any non-compliance would be a breach of contract whereas the Notes to Rule 15 contemplate that there can be some breaches of the Code which will not be a breach of Rule 15 and will not be evidence of inadequate professional services under Section 37A of the Solicitors Act 1974».

Not exact matches

Many companies can deny severance payments to any executive fired «for cause,» which generally means breaching a company's code of ethics or a criminal conviction.

- Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form of hate speech; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal proceedings or breach a court injunction or other order; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form of personal attack on another user or an employee of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages with recommendations to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information of another party or which otherwise have the purpose of affecting the price or value of any security; - Disguise the origin of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any other harmful component; - Collect or store other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any other user from using the Forums.

On 1 April 2017, the ACCC introduced changes to the Code which will now allow the ACCC to seek penalties of up to AUD $ 63, 000 for breaches of the Code.

The BHA complained about the school's policy in May, and the OSA determined in August that ten separate areas of the policy breached the School Admissions Code, which all state schools must follow.

In the United Kingdom, the 2012 Contest annual report notes that «over 4,000 URLs which breach UK terrorism legislation have been taken down», while referencing the need to see «more work done to ensure the communications industry is aware of extremist material circulating on their communications services and is actively assessing that material against their own codes of practice to determine whether it should be removed».

Heywood found Green had twice breached the ministerial code, because his misleading comments had fallen short of the «seven principles of public life», one of which is honesty.

MPs» expense data going back to 2010 shows that a number of Tory MPs have paid subscriptions to the ERG whilst holding ministerial office: an activity which appears to breach the ministerial code's rules on conflict of interest.

This is a clear breach of the UN and UNMISS Code of Conduct which prohibits sexual relationships with vulnerable individuals, including all beneficiaries of assistance.

The charges in part read: «That you Col. Mohammed Sambo Dasuki whilst being National Security Adviser and Shaibu Salisu, whilst being the Director of Finance and Administration in the Office of the National Security Adviser and Hon. Waripamowei Dudafa (now at large) whilst bring Senior Special Assistant, Domestic Affairs to the President on or about 27th November within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court entrusted with dominion over certain properties to wit: the sum of N10billion being part of the funds in the account of the National Security Adviser with the CBN, the equivalent of which sum you received from the CBN in foreign currencies to wit: $ 47million and $ 5.6 million Euros committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the said property when you claimed to have distributed same to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Primary Election delegates and you thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 315 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 532, Vol.4, LFN 2004.

«That you Col. Mohammed Sambo Dasuki whilst being National Security Adviser and Shaibu Salisu, whilst being the Director of Finance and Administration in the Office of the National Security Adviser on or about 12th December 2013 in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, and in such capacities entrusted with dominion over certain properties to wit: N90million which was in the account of the ONSA with Diamond Bank Plc, committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the said property by remitting the said sum into the account of Brains and Hammers Limited for the purchase of 7 - bedroom duplex house at No. 11 Mansur Bamalli Drive (D1064), Apo 1 Abuja and you thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 315 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 532, Vol.4, LFN 2004.

Green was ruled to have twice breached the ministerial code, because his misleading comments had fallen short of the «seven principles of public life», one of which is honesty.

Heywood found that Green had breached the ministerial code twice, because his misleading comments had fallen short of the «seven principles of public life», one of which is honesty.

«For me what was important was obviously the cabinet secretary's report, which was endorsed by Sir Alex Allan, was clear that there had been breaches of the ministerial code.

Some are suggesting that this breaches section 6 (b)(ii) of the GLA code of conduct which states that the mayor «must, when using or authorising the use by others of the resources of your authority,... ensure that such resources are not used improperly for political purposes (including party political purposes)».

Delegates debate a motion saying that the Press Complaints Commission should be replaced with a body with the impose large fines on newspapers which breach the code of conduct and that the punishment for breaking the Data Protection Act should be increased so that offenders can be sent to jail.

The committee cleared her of the central charge of deliberately submitting expenses claims to which she was not entitled, but said she had breached the ministers» code of conduct by providing «incomplete documentation and fragmentary information» to the inquiry.

When it becomes clear that the «papelle» thefts have not ceased, William is reassigned to Shanghai to finish the job, giving him the perfect opportunity to look up Maria — only to find that her memory of him has been erased after she became pregnant in breach of Code 46, a regulation which prevents childbirths resulting from genetic incest.

You and Velocity Micro agree that any claim, dispute, or controversy, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable claims («Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code of Procedure then in effect.

While stories from current and ex-employees which have been appearing on social media suggest systematic breaches of the Code by the LDH, (such killing dogs in front of other dogs), many of the practices which have outraged critics might not be morally defensible, but are perfectly legal.

Binding Arbitration: ANY CLAIM, DISPUTE, OR CONTROVERSY (WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE, WHETHER PREEXISTING, PRESENT OR FUTURE, AND INCLUDING STATUTORY, COMMON LAW, INTENTIONAL TORT AND EQUITABLE CLAIMS) BETWEEN CLIENT AND Mulcoy Travel, its respective agents, employees, principals, successors, assigns, or affiliates arising from or relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not parties to these terms and conditions), Mulcoy Travel's advertising, or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (AAA) under its Code of Procedure then in effect.

Although the ASA is a non-statutory body (which means it can't interpret or enforce legislation), it does have the power to have advertisements which breach its code of advertising practice removed — a process which of course prevents them from being used again.

While the facts and circumstances of Mullaney are of course different (other considerations apart, there was no complaint in Mullaney that the Standards Committee did not have relevant guidance drawn to its attention, whereas in Sanders it was common ground that the Case Tribunal was not referred to the relevant guidance on the circumstances in which disqualification, suspension and partial suspension may be appropriate following a finding of breach of the code of conduct), this does differ somewhat from the approach of Wilkie J in Sanders v Kingston.

I find that Constable B.'s actions, whether through inadequate training or negligence, did not comply with either the Criminal Code or the Charter and constitute a serious breach which weighs in favour of the exclusion of the evidence subsequently obtained.

For instance, the Criminal Code provides for the crime of breach of professional secrecy and the Criminal Procedure Code provides that those who are subject to professional secrecy are not obliged to testify with respect to facts of which he or she becomes aware in view of the practice of such profession.

Here, Google had a code of conduct which set out clearly what behaviour was acceptable and, as the employee clearly breached this, they were able to act quickly as a result.

Ofcom found Channel 5 in breach of r 2.11 of the Broadcasting Code which requires: - competitions to be conducted fairly; - prizes to be described accurately; and - rules to be clear and made known.

Do they also cover other risks the participants may encounter, such as theft of personal property, slips and falls, personal injury resulting from violent clients or allegations of breaching the Human Rights Code, to name a few risks which may be relevant depending on the circumstances?

Serious breaches of the code or persistent breaches of a material nature which are a breach of r 15 and may also be evidence of inadequate professional services under the Solicitors Act 1974, s 37A.

Given that Botony breached its obligations, the Court considered what an appropriate remedy might be under the Human Rights Code, which prohibits employment - related discrimination on the basis of «family status.»

The CMSA also establishes two committees — the Discipline Committee and the Appeals Committee — which are designed to hear and determine complaints about alleged breaches of professionalism (including alleged violations of the Code of Ethics).

In addition, the Partridge case appears to be one of the few instances in which a court has ordered a party to pay compensation for breaching the Human Rights Code.

These large and complex construction defect suits often involve multiple parties in which issues of code violations, negligence, breach of contract and fraud are at issue, as well as insurance coverage claims under GL policies.

Plaintiff search engine optimization firm sued defendant marketing firm for breach of contract, prompting defendant to countersue plaintiff (as a cross-defendant) for breach of contract and for a violation of Penal Code section 502 (a computer hacking claim which is given civil claim status through the statute).

Specifically, the Union alleged that Vanderpol had breached sections 6 (1) and 6 (3)(d) of the Labour Relations Code, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 244 (the «Code»), which prohibit an employer from interfering with the formation, selection or administration of a trade union, and seeking to compel or induce an employee to refrain from becoming or continuing to be a member of a union.

Restraining orders may also include conditions for arrest upon breach of the order, and breaches are considered criminal offences under section 127 of the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C - 46, which creates the offence of disobeying a court order without lawful excuse where no other punishment is expressly provided by law.

Given that the Tribunal can not award punitive damages or legal costs and typically does not award damages for lost future earning capacity and future therapeutic treatment (all of which were awarded in Olympia), it would appear that civil actions should be given serious consideration in situations where an alleged breach of the Code involves factually complex or serious acts of misconduct.

A punitive damage award is not available to an employee whose has suffered discrimination at the hands of his or her employer in breach of the Human Rights Code.2 Although discrimination cases occasional involve acts by an employer that are so malicious that it would normally attract an award of punitive damages, the Supreme Court of Canada held in Honda Canada Inc. v Keays3 that the Code is a comprehensive enforcement scheme the purpose of which is not to punish employers but to compensate employees.

Moving forward many years to the 21st century: in 2009, Bountiful community leaders Winston Blackmore, 52, and James Oler, 44, were charged with one count each of breaching Section 293 of the Criminal Code, which bans polygamy, by entering into a conjugal relationship with more than one individual at a time.

[247] Some labour arbitrators in Ontario have considered a breach of a collective agreement as a factor in assessing undue hardship: see, for example, Chatham - Kent Children's Services v. Ontario Public Service Employees» Union, Local 148 (Bowen Grievance), [2014] O.L.A.A. No. 424 (note, however, that the arbitrator in this case relied on Renaud, supra note 208, a case that arose under British Columbia's Human Rights Act, S.B.C. 1984, which did not enumerate specific factors for assessing undue hardship, as the Ontario Human Rights Code does).

Although there are two corporate respondents to this Application, there remains a possibility that the Tribunal could find that [the individual respondent] was personally liable for his own conduct which amounted to a breach of the Code... it remains potentially open to the Tribunal to make findings of liability and require monetary remedies specifically from the personal respondents for their actions if it was to find that these actions were discriminatory.

(1) there is no proof that the law society can't deal with the problem «on its own,» it being a problem that LSUC itself inflicted on the residents of Ontario by decades of ignoring it (as have all law societies), and with no attempt to solve it or learn its cause, which might well be «a breach of trust by a public officer»; see s. 122 of the Criminal Code, and the definition of «public officer» provided by, R. v. Boulanger 2006 SCC 12.

Code s. 1798.82 (a)-RRB-, which empowers its Attorney General to investigate and pursue legal action against businesses in violation of its provisions, as well as requiring mandatory notifications to consumers, defines «breach of the security of the system» as «unauthorized acquisition of computerized data that compromises the security, confidentiality, or integrity of personal information maintained by the person or business.»

Instead of writing rules and appointing a regulator to monitor for breaches, which is how the current financial system works, Bitcoin's code sets the rules and the network checks for compliance.

Further, the suit states that Beardsley was in breach of contract for failing to comply with Move's Insider Trading Policy, their Code of Conduct (which avoids «conflicts of interest or any interest that could reasonably harm Move's reputation), and their Employee Handbook (which included terms to comply with departmental rules anad policies, and complying with all federal, state, and local laws).