Sentences with phrase «breaches of the rules regarding»

The procedures were used for what My Lyon described as «less serious» breaches of the rules regarding such matters as office stationery, but the public anger over expenses has moved Sir George to prevent any further damage to the standing of MPs, which is already at an all - time low following the scandal last year.

Technically, this isn't mis - selling - it's a breach of rules regarding fairness relating to the Consumer Credit Act - but the effect is the same.

Not exact matches

«During the second round of the Honda LPGA Thailand, Lexi Thompson incurred a two - stroke penalty on hole 15 for breach of the Local Rule regarding temporary immovable obstructions as prescribed in Appendix 1,» the LPGA said in a statement, according to Golf Digest.

You and We agree that any and all disputes arising out of or related to this Agreement (including the performance, breach, or termination of this Agreement), your use of the Website, and / or your order or use of anything available through Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC and / or the Website shall be governed by and in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida (exclusive of its rules regarding conflict of laws).

But in a letter to Ms Malhotra today, Mr Bercow ruled the incident did not constitute a breach of Commons rules regarding parliamentary privilege.

«The selfishness and arrogance of Charlie Rangel has no end with regard to the fact that he has clearly breached ethics rules in one way or another,» said one senior House Democratic strategists granted anonymity to speak candidly about the New York Congressman's speech.

You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.

Governing Law: Client and Mulcoy Travel agree that these terms and conditions, or any claim, dispute or controversy (whether in contract, tort, or otherwise, whether preexisting, present or future, and including statutory, common law and equitable claims) between client and Mulcoy Travel arising from or relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour, advertising by Mulcoy Travel, or any related purchase shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to conflicts of laws rules.

Not to mention all the Schrödinger's cats, like saying «there is nothing illegal regarding Heartland shown by the released documents», right before saying that the documents «could indicate a breach of rules for non profits as far as lobbying goes».

Although Menchaca is not a case involving payment of an appraisal award, the Texas Supreme Court used it to provide clarity regarding the relationship between claims for an insurance policy breach and Insurance Code violations and applied five rules governing how claims under the policy and claims under the statute relate.

A consultant surgeon dismissed for gross professional and personal misconduct can not bring a # 3.8 m claim against an NHS trust for breach of contract regarding the disciplinary hearing, the Supreme Court has ruled.

In 2008 the US entrepreneur Mr Carl A. Sax, represented by Amsterdam & Partners, brought a claim against the city of St Petersburg, Rossiya Airlines and Pulkovo Airport (co-respondents) in an ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in Stockholm, alleging breaches of the investment contract regarding the development of a new international passenger terminal at Pulkovo International Airport in St Petersburg back in the 1990s.

Nearly 150 responses were sent to the Commission expressing a wide range of views, and the European Parliament has agreed that the Commission should take forward work in this area with a view to improving the use of private actions, noting that «the existing redress mechanisms for breaches of competition rules at European level do not guarantee the full effectiveness of Article 81 of the Treaty, in particular with regard to those suffering damage» (Parliament resolution of 25 April 2007).