Sentences with phrase «breaching party rules»

A member of the New Patriotic Party's Council of Elders Boniface Gambilla has revealed that the party's General Secretary Kwabena Agyepong will be the next to be expelled after party chairman Paul Afoko is suspended for breaching party rules.

The group was cleared by an internal Labour investigation of breaching party rules on donating to political opponents, after they assured the party the payments had been made in line with advice from the Electoral Commission.

Christian former Cabinet minister Stephen Crabb has been cleared - along with a second Conservative MP - of breaching party rules following investigations into allegations of inappropriate conduct.

Not exact matches

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP)-- A New Zealand judge said Eminem's lyrics «You own it, you better never let it go» turned out to be prophetic after ruling a political party breached copyright by using a song similar to Eminem's «Lose Yourself» in its campaign ads.

The flagbearer of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), Nana Addo Danquah Akufo - Addo has accused the ruling government of breaching Section 35 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (Act 762).

When other moderates turned out to canvass for their former colleague they'd be in breach of party rules that forbid campaigning for anyone other than the official.

Surely what you mean is «Ken may well employ sophistry to claim that he is not technically in breach of party rules, because saying that the candidate should not have been dropped, walking around for the TV cameras with the rival candidate (and having a quick chat about why the Labour candidate) did not in fact entail an explicit «vote Rahman» public statement (even though the whole point was to convey precisely that impression to any sentient being).

Sunder: Surely what you mean is «Ken may well employ sophistry to claim that he is not technically in breach of party rules,....

He has described his suspension by the National Disciplinary Committee (NDC) of the party as procedurally irregular and breaching the rules of natural justice and wants the Human Rights Division of the court to revoke that decision.

«Any complaint that was a mere cover for a party political row or dispute would be dealt with by you [The Speaker] and... would never reach the Standards and Privileges Committee, which would be asked to determine only serious or complex breaches of the rules»

According to the judge, Justice Sir Dennis Adjei, the national disciplinary committee of the NPP has jurisdiction to hear and punish anyone who had been found to have breached some rules of the party.

In York's «Evening Press» newspaper of 12 April 2005, Maroney claimed it was «for selling loony merchandise against Electoral Commission rules»: to be precise the OMRLP's Financial Scheme as registered with the Electoral Commission, which meant any Branch of the OMRLP taking money on the party's behalf would be breaching the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 Part 2.

What amazes some learned Lawyers is the emergence of questionable letters of appointments with no date during the trial, the admission of bias and breach of natural justice by Chairman of the party's Disciplinary committee Most Reverend Asante - Antwi and the admission of same in yesterday's ruling by the learned justice among others lends credence to the fact that, Justice Anthony Yeboah feared to uphold Justice.

If Mr Hain is found in breach of the rules governing party donations the electoral commission can do no more than chastise him, as it only has the power to fine political parties, not individuals.

A Liberal Democrat representative said: «We have been made aware of an alleged breach of party rules and are looking into the issue as a matter of urgency.»

She agreed to pay back the money because of a reference to the Labour Party which is a breach of parliamentary rules.

In August 2012 the BBC Trust ruled that payments to Abbott for her appearances on This Week were made in breach of BBC guidelines that banned payments to MPs who were representing their political parties.

However, if the scenario were to play out in which both politicians are found to have broken rules, I suspect that we would see a «gentlemen's agreement» between both Labour and Conservative parties not to make political capital out of either case - whereas if either Mrs Spelman or Mr Brown were found to have breached rules as an isolated news story, there would be calls for sackings, resignations etc..

A cabinet minister has said he has «every reason to suppose» the Conservatives properly reported their 2015 general election expenses amid allegations the party breached campaign spending rules.

In this case, Mr Hunter did not distinguish clearly enough between his Parliamentary and party political roles and as a result I conclude that he breached the rules by using the Communications Allowance, albeit largely indirectly, to support his party political or campaigning activities.»

A Labour Party spokesman said: «The National Constitutional Committee (NCC) of the Labour Party has found that two charges of a breach of the Labour Party's rule 2.1.8 by Marc Wadsworth have been proven.

Both of which are of course in clear breach of the most explicit prohibitions in the Commons rule book which repeatedly and categorically states that the Communications Allowance can not be used for any form of party political campaigning.

«The NCC consequently determined that the sanction for this breach of Labour Party rules will be expulsion from membership.»

On receipt of our letter, the Cabinet Secretary investigated the circumstances, identified a breach of Civil Service rules and forced the Labour Party to substantially change its website: «references there have now been amended to make clear [Backing Young Britain] is a government initiative»:

This latest breach of Civil Service rules by the Labour Party is completely unacceptable, yet we have had no apology.

I am writing today to ask you for an apology for the conduct of the Labour Party in this incident and moreover, for assurances that, as Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, you will personally ensure that Labour do not further breach any Civil Service rules.»

This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the material laws of Switzerland.All disputes controversies or differences arising out of or relating to this agreement, or breaches thereof, which can not be settled by the parties, shall be resolved, to the exclusion of the ordinary courts by a one person Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with the International Arbitration Rules of the Swiss Chamber of Commerce.

A second inquiry into the Perry Beeches academy trust, which runs five schools in Birmingham, has revealed breaches in the rules over a donation to the Labour Party and payments to the company of the wife of one of the trust's directors.

You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.

The parties agree that any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, will be settled by binding arbitration in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280 et seq., and the then current rules and procedures of the American Arbitration Association.

In a blog post discussing the involvement of solicitors in pseudonymous law firms like those alleged to be used by the banks, Richard Moorhead has observed, among other things, that «there is a substantial risk that the solicitors who signed or were involved in the production of the letters have breached their obligation to act with integrity» and that «there is a question over whether Outcome 11.1 (rule 11.1 in effect) has been breached that is solicitors must not, take unfair advantage of third parties [the debtors] in their professional capacity.»

«Finally, the link which the provisions of Chapter 13 of the envisaged agreement display with trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore is also specific in nature because a breach of the provisions concerning social protection of workers and environmental protection, set out in that chapter, authorises the other Party — in accordance with the rule of customary international law codified in Article 60 (1) of the Convention on the law of treaties, -LSB-...]-- to terminate or suspend the liberalisation, provided for in the other provisions of the envisaged agreement, of that trade.»

If the Supreme Court eventually rules that litigation funding is permitted in Ireland, it will mean that Irish parties who are lawfully entitled to compensation, for example due to a breach of contract by a large multinational corporation, or mis - selling of financial products by an international bank, can make use of the financial resources and the strategic experience of professional funders like Woodsford to get justice from the Courts».

The majority rule is that damages is not an element of a suit for breach of contract, so even if you suffer no economic harm, you can sue the breaching party for $ 1 of nominal damages.

A small business that has suffered loss as a result of a breach of competition law rules, but which can not afford the costs of litigation in the High Court, and the possibility of an adverse costs ruling against them if they lose, can shift that risk to the third - party litigation funder.

A party is not entitled to enjoin the breach of a contract by another, unless he himself has performed what the contract requires of him so far as possible; if he himself is in default or has given cause for nonperformance by defendant, he has no standing in equity... Having committed the first breach, the general rule is that a material breach of the Agreement allows the non-breaching party to treat the breach as a discharge of his contract liability.

Though deadlines may be missed, the courts do have discretion to rectify and waive certain minor irregularities and technical breaches of the rules, so long as the party in violation has shown themselves to have acted in good faith, with a reasonable explanation for the breach of rules.

Much of this «sharp lawyering» against unrepresented litigants goes unreported and uncommented on, and the reason is elementary: most unrepresented parties lack the legal sophistication and knowledge to understand that opposing counsel has treated them vexatiously, in a manner that would be in clear breach of the Rules of Professional Conduct if experienced by fellow Members of the Bar.

Any unsettled controversy or claim between the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any breach thereof shall be settled by final and binding arbitration in New York, New York pursuant to the rules then in effect of the CPR Rules of Non-Administered Arbitration and in accordance with the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards; provided that the arbitrator shall have no authority to add to, amend, modify, or ignore any of the provisions of this Agreerules then in effect of the CPR Rules of Non-Administered Arbitration and in accordance with the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards; provided that the arbitrator shall have no authority to add to, amend, modify, or ignore any of the provisions of this AgreeRules of Non-Administered Arbitration and in accordance with the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards; provided that the arbitrator shall have no authority to add to, amend, modify, or ignore any of the provisions of this Agreement.

Paul Henke v UKIP: Party's suspension of former Chairman of UKIP in Scotland declared null and void and in breach of rules of membership.

Hadley provided a straightforward rule for the recovery of damages for breach of contract — in essence, that the loss should have been in the contemplation of the parties had they contemplated breach when the contract was made.

- Private parties must be able to claim damages for losses suffered as a result of breach of the EU competition rules (see Courage Ltd v Crehan: C - 453 / 99 [2001] ECR I - 6297, [2001] All ER (EC) 886), and this must include a right to claim both for actual loss and loss of profit (see Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico Assicurazioni SpA, Cannito v Fondiaria Sai SpA, Tricarico and Murgolo v Assitalia SpA: C - 296 / 04 [2007] All ER (EC) 27).

The 3rd party agreement specifically states, breach of the rules means, IMMEDIATE termination of the feed.

«The plaintiffs have clearly alleged that: (1) all of the defendants, except Tom Bosley, were parties to the initial settlement agreement; (2) this settlement agreement required the defendants to change and / or maintain their rules so as to permit the plaintiffs to provide their new flat fee business program to consumers, together with the authorized use of MLS services, without providing traditional offer negotiation services; and (3) the defendants «blatantly» breached the express and / or implied terms of that settlement agreement by unlawfully causing CREA to subsequently enact new offer negotiation rules which prohibited the plaintiff's innovative flat fee business model.»

Thus, the trial court's ruling that the statements were not relevant to breach of fiduciary duty allegations because the statements were made before an agency relationship arose between the parties was affirmed.

A brokerage which, if so directed by a licensee, pays the licensee's earnings directly to a third party, would not be in breach of section 6 - 1 of the Rules.