I am not about to get into the complex history and debate surrounding consubstantiation (the Lutheran view) and transubstantiation (the Catholic view), except to say that both, in one way or another, see
the bread and wine as becoming something more than just bread and wine, and in this way, the elements become holy and impart grace to the believer.
They are on the altar, hidden in
bread and wine as they were hidden in the same flesh of Christ on the cross.
It is not in
the bread and wine as such.
Not exact matches
The restaurants feature a full bar with craft beer,
wine,
and liquor,
and menu items such
as the O.F.D — a half - pound beef burger with house - made tomato jam, bacon, Swiss cheese,
and sautéed mushrooms —
and sandwiches like the crispy haddock, which features seasoned panko -
breaded haddock fillets topped with lettuce, tomato,
and balsamic tartar sauce.
For if a man or a woman's body — or his or her status
as a married person, or his capacity to be a father or hers to be a mother — doesn't matter for his or her sex life, why, then, should anyone imagine that the body of the Son of God matters, whether it is in a manger, on a cross, risen, or fully
and really present under the signs of
bread and wine?
At Ettal, Bonhoeffer could go to Mass
and share in the prayers
and readings, but,
as he was not a member of the Catholic Church, he could not partake of the
bread and wine at communion.
Peyote is the focus of the worship service, much
as the consecrated
bread and wine are the focus of mass
and communion.
Said stories were so popular that they grew into a religion known today
as Catholicism / Christianity
and featuring dark - age, daily
wine to blood
and bread to body rituals called the eucharistic sacrifice of the non-atoning Jesus.
The oneness of the church — one Lord, one faith, one baptism — is
as integral to being a part of Christ's body
as receiving the sacrament of
bread and wine.
I am a Christian because of the sacraments, which Kerlin describes
as «faith under our fingernails,»
and where Jes says «abundant life is not only personal, but communal,» experienced in
bread,
wine, water, words, touch, sound,
and smell.
Christians should, given their tradition, be inclined to find sense in body language, not only because of the resurrection of the body but also because of the
bread and wine of the eucharist
as the body
and blood of Christ,
and the church
as the body with Christ
as its head.
I have encountered the presence of Jesus in fellowship with other Christians, among the poor
and disenfranchised,
as I eat the
bread and drink the
wine.
The priest might put his foot down
and ban the use of hymns that contain doctrinal errors: the one where Jesus is reported
as saying «I am with you in this
bread and wine» for example.
As for the Lord's Supper, it began so simply that at first every meal where disciples ate together was a sacred communion,
and their ordinary
bread and wine were memorials of their Lord's sacrifice.
There are seemingly many Christians who, Jesus» words
and deeds to the contrary, are determined to outspiritualize Jesus, to disembody the Christian faith from its earthy Hebrew roots, to act
as if we can experience the grace of God on our own without recourse to such primal
and primitive facts
as bread,
wine and water.
When I talk to my good friend who is a very conservative Catholic who views taking communion
as sacred
and every crumb is representative of Christ's body
and not one crumb will drop... then compare it to how we do it at church... everyone ripping
bread from the same loaf, crumbs everywhere, kids spilling the «
wine»... does it really matter... is one more right than the other... one upholds church law on how communion will be performed versus our laid back version.
While in no way wishing to suggest that anyone should not «celebrate» the Lord's Supper with a bit of
bread or cracker
and a few drops of juice or
wine,
as seems to be the common practice in many churches, may I share some of the ways we choose to celebrate
and remember our Lord with food
and drink?
So just
as baptism could be done with a few drops of water, so also the Lord's Supper could be observed with a small bit of
bread and a few drops of
wine.
But
as Catholic theology progressed, it was decided that the power of the meal was not in what happened during the meal, or in the gathering of people for the meal, or really in the food itself, but in the
bread and the
wine after it had been blessed by the priest.
During the Protestant Reformation,
as certain church leaders began to break away from the Catholic church, some of them dropped the idea about the mystical presence of Jesus within the
bread and wine, but kept the practice the same.
Some miracles are regular in occurrence (e.g., the change of the
bread and wine into the body
and blood of Christ in the sacrament, according to the Roman Catholic view), while some are unique (
as in Christ's resurrection).
While in its original use this was probably a reference to sacramental participation in the consecrated
bread and wine of the eucharist, there is a possible further extension of its meaning so that it will include a relationship with the whole natural order, seen
as a sphere of the divine activity
and hence
as a way of contact with the God who is operative within it.
When I was at uni, our Friday night contemplative prayer group would have a meal together before the praying
and we'd have the
bread and wine (or grape juice)
as part of the meal.
It is indeed a difficult task to «switch gears» from a theology based on static, spatial models alone, such
as the essence of God, the natures of Christ,
and the substance of
bread and wine, to a theology that is concerned with spatio - temporal models, such
as change in God, Christ becoming divine,
and the on - going process of revelation.
«We must say that the accidents of the
bread and the
wine, which are perceived by the senses
as remaining after consecration, do not have
as their subject the substance of the
bread and the
wine, since,
as has been said, that does not continue to exist.
Our concern is not with these, but rather to state simply that the reality of the presence of Christ in the Holy Communion is a given fact of two thousand years of Christian experience,
and that Christian worship
as it has historically developed has found that in the partaking of the consecrated
bread and wine,
as Christ commanded, His «spiritual body
and blood» — which is to say, the reality of His life, divine
and human, in a uniquely intimate
and genuine way — have been received
as His presence has been known
and his person adored.
It was true for Jesus,
as it is true about the Bible... about preaching
and teaching...
and about the
bread and wine and water of the Sacraments.
It is a claim that God's grace is mediated through the material: in the incarnation, God became human flesh
and dwelt among us; in the Passion, it was Christ's body that was crucified; in the Eucharist, Christ is truly present in the elements of
bread and wine;
as we partake of these elements, approaching the altar with our bodies, eating
and drinking, we become the very body of Christ;
and in the eschaton, it is this very materiality of creation that God will transform
and glorify.
In the early church this celebration generally included more than just
bread and wine, though in the course of the meal this act of Jesus was repeated
as the principal act in table fellowship.
Resurrection feels like the
wine running down your fingers
and into the palm of your hand
as you hold up that piece of soaked
bread and then you put it on your tongue
and push it up against the roof of your mouth, tasting
and seeing.
In seeking to develop a theology of nature, process theologians are supportive of endeavors to appropriate other images from the tradition, such
as St. Francis» compassionate love for the poor
and treatment of animals
as sisters
and brothers, the Orthodox view of the church
as inclusive of all of creation,
and the use of the elements of
bread and wine in the Eucharist, products of the interworkings between God, the non-human natural world,
and human labor, that speak, to contemporary needs.
Advent bears good tidings that this is the One who comes
as body
and blood,
bread and wine, to hungry mouths at the Eucharist feast,
and who comes back to us through compassionate acts of filling the hungry with good things.
just
as the Lord's cup consists neither of water alone nor of
wine alone but requires both to be intermingled together, so, too, the Lord's body can neither be flour alone nor water alone but requires that both be united
and fused together so
as to form the structure of one loaf of
bread.
By the time Paul writes 1 Corinthians, it appears that the tradition was firmly established that part of the meal of fellowship between believers included remembering the death of Jesus
as symbolized by
bread and wine.
Furthermore, since the death
and resurrection of Jesus was central to Christian belief
and practice,
and since teaching was often done with the help of symbols, it probably became customary
as a part of nearly every meal where Christians were gathered, to remind people that the
bread they were eating represented the body of Jesus which was broken for them,
and the
wine they were drinking represented His blood.
It uses «ordinary» materials such
as fire,
bread,
wine, clothing,
and books
and proscribed words
and gestures
as its elements.
And that reality is indelibly associated with the bread and wine which are used according to Christ's own action at the Last Supper, so that in receiving them we may say, as the Church has always said, that we receive «the spiritual food of the body and blood of Christ,» and that we receive this «to our great and endless comfort,» or strengtheni
And that reality is indelibly associated with the
bread and wine which are used according to Christ's own action at the Last Supper, so that in receiving them we may say, as the Church has always said, that we receive «the spiritual food of the body and blood of Christ,» and that we receive this «to our great and endless comfort,» or strengtheni
and wine which are used according to Christ's own action at the Last Supper, so that in receiving them we may say,
as the Church has always said, that we receive «the spiritual food of the body
and blood of Christ,» and that we receive this «to our great and endless comfort,» or strengtheni
and blood of Christ,»
and that we receive this «to our great and endless comfort,» or strengtheni
and that we receive this «to our great
and endless comfort,» or strengtheni
and endless comfort,» or strengthening.
If Jesus could have said it, he wouldn't have served it to us
as bread and wine.
We see the same thing at the Last Supper,
as Jesus gives the
bread and wine to all who are there — even to Peter, who Jesus said would deny him,
and to Judas, who would betray him.
offering of Christ to his heavenly Father,
as we are nourished by his risen life in the receiving of
bread and wine and so «make memorial» of him
and of all that he did
and was.
Presiding at the altar of Immaculate Conception on Fourteenth St.
and First Ave., with hundreds
and hundreds of ordinary Americans, I am consistently impressed by the intensity of the response to the particularity of Bible story, of
bread and wine, of body
and blood, of confession
and absolution, of lively interaction with Mary
and all the saints,
and, yes, of miracles»
and all this concentrated
as concentrated can be on Jesus Christ incarnate, present, helping, judging, forgiving,
and coming again.
Though not seen face to face, this God is yet encountered with a striking immediacy in the larvae Dei — the created marvels of God's hand, the
bread and wine at mass, even the mystery of one's own self
as created being.
And so Old Adam still will have his day As celebrant at feasts some people keep For flesh and blood that never wake from sleep, This bread and wine of human show and pl
And so Old Adam still will have his day
As celebrant at feasts some people keep For flesh
and blood that never wake from sleep, This bread and wine of human show and pl
and blood that never wake from sleep, This
bread and wine of human show and pl
and wine of human show
and pl
and play.
Consider the singing of a Bach cantata, or the flying buttresses of a Gothic cathedral, or the poetry of George Herbert, or the embrace of lovers long separated, or the gift of time
and love to the dying, or the Christian assembly on its knees
as bread and wine are consecrated on the altar.
A narrative of a Lenten meditation in poetic form written from the standpoint of the apostle Thomas:
And if it were not for his love, his grace that sought me out behind locked doors, called me to touch and then believe, I would not be here at your humble table ready now with you, to break the bread and pour the wine as he did years a
And if it were not for his love, his grace that sought me out behind locked doors, called me to touch
and then believe, I would not be here at your humble table ready now with you, to break the bread and pour the wine as he did years a
and then believe, I would not be here at your humble table ready now with you, to break the
bread and pour the wine as he did years a
and pour the
wine as he did years ago.
It is
as if the inner reality is Jesus, but what we see, touch
and taste is
bread and wine.
The essence of the consecrated
bread and wine is Christ, not just symbolic of Him — after all, if it were just symbolic, why would Christ pick eating
bread as the way to remember Him?
Now the change at Mass of
bread and wine into the Body
and Blood of Christ occurs immediately at the words of consecration
and remains
as long
as the appearances of
bread and wine remain.
Given my belief that communion
wine can be validly consecrated into the Blood of Christ,
and communion
bread into the Body of Christ, we can now cue all the folks who will make jokes about cannibalism, etc. (just
as the Romans did about early Christians — very little anti-Christian humor is original).
St Thomas taught that Jesus is present
as a spiritual body without accidents, under the appearances, or accidents, of
bread and wine.