Data Collec tion Guide — This guide will help you to collect
breastfeeding data at your hospital at discharge and at 6 months.
Not exact matches
For their report, Hauck and her colleagues looked
at data from a large infant feeding study and they focused on about 1,800 mothers who were
breastfeeding when their baby was two weeks old.
The latest CDC
data shows that 79 % of new mothers
breastfeed at some point, but most fall short of their intended
breastfeeding goals.
The Lancet's latest
breastfeeding series was launched
at the end of the month, suggesting that the lives of 823,000 babies could be saved around the world every year through improved
breastfeeding rates (this estimate is for 75 low - income and middle - income countries countries in the Countdown to 2015
data project).
Statistics are being made available via NHS England and Public Health England but this
data only covers Initiation of
Breastfeeding and
Breastfeeding at 6 - 8 weeks.
Data from 2003 indicates that 71 percent of U.S. mothers initiate some
breastfeeding, but only 36 percent report feeding any human milk to their infants
at six months.
Despite the overwhelming
data and worldwide endorsement of
breastfeeding for
at least two years, many women do not
breastfeed at all or wean after several months.
Women in our study had a high rate of
breastfeeding at 6 weeks postpartum (69 %) compared with other Australian
data showing that 58 % of all infants were fully
breastfed at 2 months of age.50 This may have been owing to a higher motivation of women in our cohort, and a good level of support and continuity of midwifery care, which has been shown to enhance rates of
breastfeeding.
Actually hun I was told to
breastfeed my child who is 3 because her immune system is really weak and FYI cookies don't work for boo boos how about u get a reality check and look
at all the
data that supports it so instead of making yourself look ignorant to something you may not understand do your research so you may be more informed before you make reality check comments
Further
data come from the KiGGs Study, a large study on health and lifestyle of babies and young children, which also collected
data on
breastfeeding [19], from a study to determine the
breastfeeding situation in Bavaria [20] and, most recently, a study conducted in the city of Freiburg [21] Looking
at these scanty, mostly non-representative and difficult to compare
data, it seems that the
breastfeeding situation in Germany is a bit better than in some other European countries.
Hospital Discharge Bags and
Breastfeeding at 6 Months:
Data from the Infant Feeding Practices Study
Differences in Maternal Characteristics Between Children With Missing and Nonmissing
Data on
Breastfeeding and Doctor - Attended Infectious Diseases
at the Age of 6 Months: Eligible Cohort (N = 7116)
We defined optimal levels as
breastfeeding for
at least 1 year after each birth, consistent with medical recommendations.1, 2 Current
breastfeeding rates were taken from final monthly
data from the National Immunization Survey (see Appendix 1, available online
at http://links.lww.com/AOG/A398).
CDC analyzed 2011 — 2015 National Immunization Survey (NIS)
data for children born during 2010 — 2013 to describe
breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity through 6 months and duration
at 12 months among black and white infants.
Given new scientific
data that exclusively
breastfed newborns are in fact
at significant risk for brain - threatening hypoglycemia, jaundice and dehydration, mothers are asking how they can supplement in the first days of life without compromising their long - term
breastfeeding success.
Of all participants with
breastfeeding data, 10 % and 14 % had missing
data on infectious diseases
at the ages of 6 and 12 months, respectively.
We presented
data on the high rates of complications in exclusively
breastfed newborns from research conducted
at BFHI hospitals and the expected prevalence of brain injury and long - term disability resulting from those complications.
We used
data from a large cluster - randomized trial to assess the impact of a
breastfeeding promotion intervention on socioeconomic inequalities in
breastfeeding (exclusivity and duration) and in child cognitive ability
at early school age.
Although I'd read enough
data to show I was
at no greater risk of not being able to
breastfeed after a breast augmentation surgery, I was nervous.
Although not directly comparable, our findings are in broad agreement with those from routine
data in Scotland that have indicated a positive association between Baby Friendly accreditation, but not certification, and
breastfeeding at 1 week of age.17 Our findings reinforce those of Coutinho and colleagues who reported that high exclusive
breastfeeding rates achieved in Brazilian hospitals implementing staff training with the course content of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative were short - lived and not sustained
at home unless implemented in combination with post-natal home visits.35 Similarly in Italy, training of staff with an adapted version of the Baby Friendly course content resulted in high
breastfeeding rates
at discharge, with a rapid decrease in the days after leaving hospital.36 In contrast, a cluster randomized trial in Belarus (PROBIT) found an association between an intervention modelled on the Baby Friendly Initiative with an increased duration of
breastfeeding37 an association also reported from an observational study in Germany.38 Mothers in Belarus stay in hospital post-partum for 6 — 7 days, and in Germany for 5 days, with post-natal support likely to be particularly important in countries where mothers stay in the hospital for a shorter time, with early discharge likely to limit the influence of a hospital - based intervention.
The purpose of our study was to determine whether
breastfeeding rates in the UK were higher among mothers delivering in Baby Friendly accredited maternity units, using
data from the Millennium Cohort Study.18 Specifically we assessed
breastfeeding initiation and the prevalence of any
breastfeeding at 1 month after adjustment for maternal factors known to influence a mother's decision to
breastfeed.
We also excluded those with no missing
breastfeeding data (3), or who were born outside the UK (25), or who moved UK country between birth and 9 months (144), or were delivered
at home (346) or on the way to hospital (36), or for whom hospital of birth was missing or not identified (95) or were delivered in units where the Baby Friendly Accreditation Award had been removed (142).
It combines 5 historic case control
data sets from Europe, the U.K., and Australasia to specifically look
at the risk of bedsharing in
breastfed babies in nonsmoking households.
Although in this study information on
breastfeeding practice was reliant upon maternal recall
at 9 months,
breastfeeding figures are in agreement with
data collected prospectively in the UK Infant Feeding Survey conducted in 2000.32 Likewise, the validity of maternal recall of the circumstances of pregnancy and delivery has been shown to be accurate.33 We were unable to adjust for maternal intention to
breastfeed at antenatal booking, a factor shown to be important in previous studies34 as this information was not collected in the survey.
Carlsen's study took place
at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology
at Trondheim and studied
data from over 50 studies that looked
at the connection between
breastfeeding and a baby's health.
If you compare
breastfeeding rates around the world (where the
data has been collected), 50 % of mothers are «still»
breastfeeding their child
at 23 months old [3].»
Data show that 76 % of women in Wisconsin report «ever
breastfeeding» and that 48.1 % report
breastfeeding (not necessarily exclusively)
at 6 months post-partum.
What is interesting in these
data is that there were clear differences between exclusive
breastfeeding and mixed - and formula - feeding mothers, but there was no significant difference between mixed - and formula - feeding on any of the variables we looked
at.
Six studies collected
data about any
breastfeeding:
at discharge to home, three and six months (Collins 2004),
at six weeks and four months (Graffy 2004),
at six to eight weeks (Hoddinott 2012),
at discharge to home, then monthly until six months (Junior 2007),
at two weeks, two months and six months (Paul 2012), and
at one, three, and six months (Reeder 2014).
Secondary outcomes:
data provided by the research team on maternal satisfaction,
breastfeeding outcomes (duration and exclusivity) and infant health outcomes
at 2 weeks and 2 months following birth.
Similar to peanut in pregnancy,
data are inconclusive about whether you should avoid peanuts while
breastfeeding, and
at this time no recommendation can be made.
Graphically presented
data from a cohort study in Bangladesh showed similar weight and length gains in infants exclusively
breastfed with supplements beginning
at six to 11 months compared with those exclusively
breastfed for 12 months and supplemented between 12 and 15 months.
According to
data compiled by UNICEF, half of the world's population continues
breastfeeding until
at least the age of two.
In a secondary analysis, the NSLY found that the achievement scores of children
breastfed for
at least 29 weeks were 1.5 points higher than those of children never
breastfed (P =.01), but the authors considered their
data about
breastfeeding duration «less reliable» than
data about whether a child was ever
breastfed.
Since October 2015 the
breastfeeding data have been obtained via interim reporting arrangements to collect health visiting activity
at a local authority resident level.
In 1986, 2 years before these
data were collected, the United States ranked 16th (3.6 / 1000) in postneonatal death, well below Finland (first; 1.8 / 1000) and Sweden (second; 2.0 / 1000).24 The US
breastfeeding prevalence in 1986 was 57 %
at birth and 22 %
at 6 months, 25 whereas in Finland and Sweden, the prevalence
at 6 months then was still ~ 60 % and 50 %, respectively.26 Although the United States still trails the Nordic countries both in
breastfeeding and in postneonatal mortality, the US rate of postneonatal death has fallen steadily between the late 1980s and now, and
breastfeeding has increased.
We know the
data shows that moms or parents it's most effective when you have a partner there with you that takes
breastfeeding classes have a much higher rate of success
at achieving their
breastfeeding goals simply because they know what to expect.
I should look closer
at the cancer
data, but given the rates of
breastfeeding over the last few decades, especially of
breastfeeding past 1 year, I would guess that most of the cancer
data comes from women with several shorter lactations.
Government survey
data suggest that while most U.S. women start
breastfeeding their newborns, only 32 percent are still exclusively
breastfeeding at three months, and 12 percent are doing so
at six months.
The analysis of the CDC's National Immunization Survey (NIS)
data found that in 2014, children who were being exclusively
breastfed for three months now stands
at 46.6 % — a big increase from the 36 % rate in 2009 — but still almost half the number that start out
breastfeeding.
The study, which looked
at data for more than 25,000 women participating in the Danish National Birth Cohort, measured how long women
breastfed and also how intensely.
At the same time, the
data show that
breastfeeding is quite compatible with an urban industrial environment and that appropriate
breastfeeding promotion can succeed anywhere.
Background rates of
breastfeeding initiation:
data from an inner - city Cleveland clinic with a similar population reported lower rates with any and exclusive
breastfeeding at 5 days
at 40.8 % and 22.0 %, respectively.
Interviews took place while women continued to
breastfeed and it was not clear how many women remained to follow - up
at different points although no drop - out was reported for the final
data collection interview
at 6 months.
At 18 mo, the results were attenuated, but, here also, women who
breastfed as recommended had the lowest probability of retaining ≥ 5 kg GWG, irrespective of the total GWG (
data not shown).
In fact, the little
data that is available on this says that infants who are in the adult be to
breastfeed and are then placed back to sleep in a safe crib are not
at increased risk of SIDS (those would be the infants like my babies who bedshared in adult bed accidentally because the mother did not plan or intend to bedshare but passed out while night nursing and woke up several hours later).
Looking
at the study
data, Alderete said the average
breastfeeding 1 - month - old baby could consume just 10 milligrams (about a grain of rice) of fructose from breast milk a day, yet he would see adverse changes in body composition during growth.
When researchers looked
at the raw
data, they saw that children
breastfed for
at least six months displayed better outcomes in all 13 developmental areas measured.
Child feeding
data were collated only for those participants who had reported an age
at which they ceased
breastfeeding and commenced solids.
Extensive
data were collected on mothers» demographic characteristics, health history, including maternal history of asthma, prenatal and postnatal maternal psychological distress (anxiety, depression or stress), maternal social support (specifically the extent of partner / spouse support) and children's birth and health outcomes including
breastfeeding status (
at 3 months) from the APrON surveys completed
at prenatal or postnatal clinic visits or sent in by mail.