In Colorado v. Connelly, JUSTICE BRENNAN, joined by JUSTICE STEVENS, filed a memorandum objecting to
this briefing of an additional question, explaining that
Not exact matches
Judge Cote ruled this week (PDF) that the
brief they already submitted — which «contains five pages
of substantive arguments that do not address the
question of whether leave to file amici curiae responses is appropriate, but rather oppose approval
of the proposed Final Judgment» — will suffice as B&N and the ABA's only comment on the matter, and «no
additional filings from the ABA and Barnes & Noble shall be permitted.»
The notice is required to include the following information: • A
brief description
of the breach, including the date
of the breach and the date
of its discovery, if known; • A description
of the type
of Unsecured Protected Health Information involved in the breach; • Steps you should take to protect yourself from potential harm resulting from the breach; • A
brief description
of actions we are taking to investigate the breach, mitigate losses, and protect against further breaches; • Contact information, including a toll - free telephone number, e-mail address, Web site or postal address to permit you to ask
questions or obtain
additional information.
The notice is required to include the following information: • a
brief description
of the breach, including the date
of the breach and the date
of its discovery, if known; • a description
of the type
of Unsecured Protected Health Information involved in the breach; • steps you should take to protect yourself from potential harm resulting from the breach; • a
brief description
of actions we are taking to investigate the breach, mitigate losses, and protect against further breaches; • contact information, including a toll - free telephone number, e-mail address, Web site or postal address to permit you to ask
questions or obtain
additional information.