Sentences with phrase «brilliant jerks»

Some companies enjoy hiring brilliant jerks because it fits with a competitive internal environment.

, an actor who has made almost an entire career playing brilliant jerks.

«And I announced at that all - hands that Uber would become a place of zero tolerance for brilliant jerks.»

There are organizations where brilliant jerks are welcomed and where they thrive.

«I'm always trying to get brilliant jerks into the company, but it never works,» Poon Tip says.

And, in The Myth of the Nice Girl, Fran Hauser redefines our outdated notions of what a powerful leader should look like and shows how a culture in which we no longer allow brilliant jerks to dominate the workplace will be better not just for women, but for everyone — and for the bottom line.»

I think, you know, the so - called brilliant jerks have been given a pass for far too long.

Many businesses these days are writing and speaking about why not to hire brilliant jerks.

Edison, that brilliant inventor and sometimes thief, is played by Benedict Cumberbatch, an actor who has made almost an entire career playing brilliant jerks.

That's why hiring is so important: You don't simply want a bunch of «brilliant jerks,» as Netflix CEO Reed Hastings calls them.

«I named top performers who misbehaved «brilliant jerks,»» Huffington told Nancy Gibbs, editorial director of Time Inc..

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings has been very clear about what his organization does with its brilliant jerks: It gets rid of them.

But if you're like Netflix and believe there is greater collaborative power through teamwork, then you need to act now when it comes to dealing with your brilliant jerks.

Certainly, your first option should potentially be to use coaching as a way to polish a brilliant jerk's prickly edges.

On the other hand, tech is an exceptionally male world that glorifies a frat - boy lifestyle, where offices are filled with booze and «brilliant jerks» tend to be the rule, not the exception.

She reportedly told employees at a recent hour - and - a-half all - hands meeting that there would be no more hiring of «brilliant jerks.»

One thing we (and now, Arianna Huffington and Uber) look to avoid is hiring the «brilliant jerk» — a person who is bright, capable and unpleasant.

It is an extraordinary document, 124 slides in all, covering everything from its salaries (it pays employees what it believes a competitor trying to poach them would) to why it rejects «brilliant jerks» («cost to effective teamwork is too high»).

But in March, facing crises on multiple fronts, top officials convened a call for reporters to insist that Uber was changing its culture and would no longer tolerate «brilliant jerks.»

It is also one that has favored what Huffington has called «brilliant jerks,» who can act badly without consequences.

The situation at the company has deteriorated since then, obviously, after a blog post by a former female engineer chronicled a deeply dysfunctional management led by Kalanick that favored what board member Arianna Huffington called «brilliant jerks.»

In other words, will Uber take those brilliant jerks and tell them not to let the door hit them — hey, nice leather jackets, by the way — on the way out?

Which is to say, brilliant jerks and the executives who tolerate them, some of whom are also brilliant jerks.

Or, as Uber board member Arianna Huffington more accurately dubbed them at an all - hands meeting earlier this week: «Brilliant jerks.»

Such new rectitude has been unusual for Kalanick, given how loyal and tolerant he has reportedly been to a range of what Huffington described as «brilliant jerks» at Uber.

Employees who violate harassment, discrimination, or retaliation policies are not «brilliant jerks» - they are a huge risk to the company and a very real and scary risk to their fellow employees.

The brilliant jerk in question this time is none other than the Wizard of Menlo Park himself, Thomas Edison.