Its reason for doing so was that if the officer was required to testify in a case that he might
bring against the Appellant, his testimony will be at risk if the Appellant sought disclosure of the unproven allegations.
Not exact matches
Dr. Mann has transgressed scientific norms and offended First Amendment principles by
bringing a defamation claim
against Appellants for their pointed criticism of his scientific methodology.
It was in respect of her containment that the
appellant brought an action
against the Commissioner for damages at common law for false imprisonment and under s 7 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) in respect of her right to liberty as guaranteed by Art 5 of the Convention.
The respondent
brought an action in Ontario
against Dr. Lu, three Chinese corporations and a British Virgin Island corporation (hereafter the «
appellants») for breach of confidence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy, unjust enrichment and / or unlawful interference with economic interests after discovering clones being sold in the global market.
Actions were
brought in Ontario
against a number of parties, including the
appellant Club Resorts Ltd. («Club Resorts»), a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands that managed the two hotels where the accidents occurred.
The adults
brought suit for malicious prosecution
against a number of people, including the Crown prosecutor, the
appellant Miazga.
«The
appellant maintains that, by its nature, a tax on criminal defence legal fees will, at some level, be prohibitive or at the very least act as an impediment to or will interfere with the right to counsel since the additional cost of the tax to an accused will interfere with the financial resources available to mount a defence to the charges
brought against him or her,» wrote Tax Court of Canada Justice Brent Paris, summing up the firm's case.
[1] The
appellant, who is a lawyer,
brought an action in Small Claims Court
against the defendant seeking damages in the amount of $ 14,933.22 for breach of contract.
In Gutowski, a municipal councilor
brought an action in defamation
against the
appellants, fellow municipal councilors in the County of Frontenac, which stemmed from statements made by the
appellants in a regular council meeting.
The respondent
brought a public procurement claim
against the
appellant NDA, in connection...
The respondent
brought a public procurement claim
against the
appellant NDA, in connection with its unsuccessful bid for a contract for services to decommission sites previously used for nuclear generation.
The Court determined that the
Appellant's challenge was to the conduct of the Respondent in
bringing and pursuing disciplinary proceedings
against her, not to an alleged state of affairs in which BME lawyers were more likely to be the subject of such proceedings.
Romanova v Sloutsker: for the
appellant Russian journalist on behalf of Media Law Defence Initiative in her challenge to Court of Appeal
against jurisdiction judgment -LRB-[2015] EWHC 545 (QB)-RRB- permitting the libel claim of a Russian oligarch to be
brought in the English courts.
The
appellants brought an action
against their next door neighbour seeking injunctive relief and damages for: (i) invasion of privacy arising from video and audio cameras which they say were trained on their property; (ii) nuisance arising from outside speakers, floodlights and the occasional errant hockey puck; (iii) trespass arising primarily from the construction of two fences; and (iv) abuse of process arising from an application for a peace bond made by the respondents before a justice of the peace.
As a result, it was open to the
appellant to await the outcome of the criminal proceedings
against him before finally deciding whether to
bring his action, regardless of when he first formed the intention to sue.
The order arises out of a contempt motion
brought in the course of the efforts of the
appellants, Joseph and Pepi Greenberg, to enforce a judgment
against the respondent, Steven Nowack.