A third party can
bring negligent misrepresentation allegations against professional individuals or entities who provide false information due to lack of competence or failure to exercise proper care in preparing information which is relied upon by a third party and such reliance is foreseeable to the professional.
The law provides that a third party can
bring negligent misrepresentation allegations against professional individuals or entities that provide false information due to lack of competence or failure to exercise proper care in preparing information that a third party is foreseeably reliant upon.
However, the court found that the Smileys could
bring negligent misrepresentation allegations against the inspector and so reversed the trial court on these allegations.
Not exact matches
The Business Trial Group can assist you in
bringing claims for
negligent failure to procure insurance, insurance agents or brokers breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract to procure insurance, and agents» or broker's
misrepresentations.
Represented company and executives in fraud,
negligent misrepresentation, and wrongful termination matters
brought by former CEO with regard to former CEO's employment contract and entitlement to company stock.
Successfully opposed attempt to certify proposed nationwide class action
brought by franchisees against franchisor alleging claims for, among other things, fraud,
negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract.
Edison Subs, LLC — a transferee of a Edison, New Jersey Subway restaurant —
brought an action in New Jersey state court against the franchisor (Doctor's Associates, Inc.), the former franchisee (Aliya Patel), and the franchisor's affiliate (Subway Real Estate Corp.), alleging breach of contract, fraud, violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act,
negligent misrepresentation, and violation of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
In addition to suing the real estate entities and individuals involved in the transaction and the seller of the property, the business owners also
brought suit against the appraiser for
negligent misrepresentation.
The nine buyers
brought a lawsuit against the Beemans, the Company, the Lender, and the Appraiser for engaging in a conspiracy to defraud, fraud, violations of the state's consumer protection act («Act»), and
negligent misrepresentation.
The Buyer
brought a lawsuit against the Developer, claiming that the Developer misrepresented the Neighbor's disruptive behavior and alleged
negligent misrepresentation, consumer fraud allegations, and
negligent infliction of emotional distress.
The purchasers alleged that the defendants conspired to mislead and defraud the purchasers regarding the costs of the 1031 transaction, and
brought claims for intentional
misrepresentation,
negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and unfair business practices.
The Buyer
brought a lawsuit against the Sellers, and the trial court ruled that the Sellers were guilty of
negligent misrepresentation and also ruled that the Buyer had suffered $ 25,000 in damages.
The Buyer
brought a lawsuit, alleging that the Broker was liable for fraudulent concealment,
negligent misrepresentations, and violations of the state's Consumer Protection Act («Act»), a statute which protects consumers against fraud.