In this regard there is no invisible hand that
brings about equilibrium between supply and demand.
It's up to you, as a healthy adult, to take loving action on behalf of your inner child to
bring about equilibrium.
Due to its strictness and efficiency in its workouts, it has aided in streamlining and
brought about equilibrium in financial markets thus it's increasingly beneficial in terms of regulatory themes.
Surface - to - atmosphere sensible and latent heat fluxes
bring about equilibrium.
Not exact matches
Which
brings up a question: what do we know
about the actual time to
equilibrium?
Radiative
equilibrium at small LW optical thickness occurs when the whole atmosphere has a temperature such that the Planck function is
about half of that of the surface (a skin temperature), whereas at larger LW optical thicknesses, the
equilibrium profile has a signficant drop in the Planck function through the atmosphere, approaching half the OLR value at TOA and approaching the surface value towards the surface — of course, convection near the surface will
bring a closer match between surface and surface - air temperatures.
By focusing soley on the
equilibrium climate sensitivity, the authors do miss a lot of features important to people
about the overall climate system — for example, what's the
equilibrium sensitivity of the carbon cycle to the temperature change
brought about by 2X CO2?
It takes
about 1.5 years to
bring the oceans surface layer in
equilibrium with the atmosphere.
Now, if you can sort that out, where you're getting his quotes, maybe I've missed them, why you've totally ignored his scenario, why you're arguing against a straw man of thermal
equilibrium of your own invention and
brought in the totally irrelevant conduction through solids and all the arguments
about the 2nd law with respect to that, maybe you could write something worth reading
about his paper.
You're quoting stuff I can't find, you've ditched his scenario and put your own in its place, and changing energetic
equilibrium for thermal equilbrium you then spend your whole time arguing that he can't get an adiabatic lapse rate from a thermal
equilibrium which he never said he could, and, you
bring in conduction, the wire, when he is explicitly talking
about gases.
An albedo decrease of only 1 %,
bringing the Earth's albedo from 30 % to 29 %, would cause an increase in the black - body radiative
equilibrium temperature of
about 1 °C, a highly significant value, roughly equivalent to the direct radiative effect of a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 concentration.
The short and lazy answer to Matthew Marler's question
about the column energetics that
bring the system back to
equilibrium is that GCMs do of course represent evaporation, sensible heating, etc in ways that are undoubtedly imperfect (e.g., via «bulk formulas» that transfer energy down - gradient of temperature or humidity differences between the surface and air aloft), but they are free to evolve in climate change scenarios in ways that are physically self - consistent.