Not exact matches
Any policy stupidity that we implement, which is possible even given that AGW is true, can't be laid at the feet
of climate science, and we shouldn't be laying
broad and vague outcomes at the feet
of specific
fields.
Yet who despite lack
of relevant expertise, do not welcome the appraisal
of experts — and on this topic the experts are those scientists in directly related
fields who professionally study this issue — but often, at least with the more general anti
climate change efforts that have massively skewed the «discussion,» in fact often expend a great deal
of effort to find any possible fault, real or imagined with anything they assert, then erroneously turn that into a refutation
of the
broader issue, along with, often, denigrating
climate science efforts, and often
climate scientists.
A difficult question for the
climate science community is, how is it that this
broad community
of researchers — full
of bright and thoughtful people — allowed intolerant activists who make false claims to certainty to become the public face
of the
field?»
But as important a goal for me is ending the
climate of fear that Mann and his fellow ayatollahs
of alarmism have imposed on a critical
field of science and in the
broader sphere
of public policy.