LegalRnD will relentlessly pursue advancement of the legal profession and public service by providing
broader access to legal services.
But as it relates to the public's entrusting them to ensure
broader access to legal services, they've failed.
Not exact matches
Delivering
access to justice demands change and action on a very
broad range of initiatives — pro bono work by the private bar, fair and adequate funding of
legal aid, collaboration among all system participants (clients, lawyers, courts, agencies, NGO's),
legal education (and its financing), e-filing and case data standards, court forms, court interfaces
to self - represented litigants, unbundled
legal services, virtual law practice, multistate practice, law practice ownership and investment, limited practice licenses, unauthorized practice of law rules, lawyer advertising rules, and lawyer discipline.
Although many lawyers already provide «limited scope
legal services,» new clarity and direction in the
legal profession's rules of conduct should improve public
access to a
broader range of these
services.
«Law firms, corporate
legal departments and other
legal service providers are invited
to submit innovations from any practice area or business function
to four
broad sections:
legal expertise, the business of law, and new sections looking at collaboration, and the rule of law and
access to justice.»
These
services include a
broad range of governmental and non-governmental
service providers providing
access to legal information and assistance through self - help guides, drop - in centres, and web resources.
A
broad vision for how just a few lawyers who share actual numbers on their profitability from unbundled
legal services will gradually turn the tide on the number of attorneys introducing these options in their practice, and the impact this has on
access to justice nationwide
Working with a
broad range of state, community, and national civil
legal assistance, civil rights, and community - based organizations
to advance racial justice and leadership development as core values in the civil justice community and
to help low - income people have meaningful
access to a full range of
legal assistance
services
Unbundled
legal service, also called limited scope representation, has emerged as a model
to create more affordable
services, increase
access to justice, and provide a
broader base of clients
to practitioners.
It is engaged in a sweeping re-imagining of the way
legal services are delivered in this country, focusing on three
broad areas:
access to justice, diversity, and the future of
legal practice.
in the community as a way for citizens
to obtain
access to the kinds of information, resources and pathways that they need
to address the
broad spectrum of their needs and problems (sorting out
legal problems from other challenges including financial, relationships, health, social
services etc.).
While the LSI report focuses on LSA 2007, it's that other piece of landmark
legal services legislation — LASPO — that should provide the impetus for (one hopes) a new and much
broader discussion about the meaning of «
access to justice».
The findings highlight the complexity of the debate around where pro bono
services fit in in the quest
to achieve greater
access to justice, as well as raising
broader questions around professional ethics in the
legal industry.