Sentences with phrase «broader arguments in the case»

Watson's order is only temporary until the broader arguments in the case can be heard.

Not exact matches

But by the time Brandeis memorialized his arguments in his famous dissent in Olmstead v. United States, the first wiretap case, the focus on factual circumstances has disappeared, replaced by a broader appeal to constitutional «values»:

Among his arguments to dismiss the case, Porter says that the criminal impersonation law is being applied to Conner in a way that is vague and overly broad.

After being fired from her post as Chief of the Special Victims Unit for refusing to «go along to get along,» Alice Vachss published the incendiary Sex Crimes, described as «a stark, passionate closing argument in [her] broader case against the criminal justice system» by the NY Times, which named it as a Notable Book of the Year.

In some of these cases, the argument is as broad and non-specific as global warming.

I can make the case in the broad argument that you don't get cheap energy from cheap fossil economic policies as something that always mathematically is true, so no Political decision giving special favor to fossil can be justified (see above).

Samsung argues that it was Apple's choice to base its» 647 - related arguments on a broader claim construction than the one the Federal Circuit ultimately affirmed (Samsung says «Apple «shot for the moon»»), and «Apple's risk failed» when the appeals court handed down its opinion in what I always just call the «Posner case».

The Advocate General adds, however, which is a novel argument in the case - law of the Court, that a broad understanding of the right under Article 3 (1) serves to safeguard a flexible interpretation of its scope in the light of technological developments (para. 50).

In all cases, though the argument has to be that there is something «broken» about continuing to apply the existing law, or to not invent new law, in the particular case or broader issue in plaIn all cases, though the argument has to be that there is something «broken» about continuing to apply the existing law, or to not invent new law, in the particular case or broader issue in plain the particular case or broader issue in plain play.

«Both cases, as well as the broader international controversies over whaling and sealing in the context of which they arose, illustrate the persuasive power of the «appeal to science»: enlisting scientific objectivity and rigour to underpin the credibility of legal arguments and legal norms,» says the abstract.

The Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday for Benisek v. Lamone, a case on gerrymandering in Maryland that could have broad effects on future elections.