Not exact matches
O'Malley is especially single - minded in eschewing the use of terminology such as «liberal» or «conservative», making the
valid point that such
broad groupings were not easily identifiable at the time and were often marked by a certain fluidity in connection with particular issues.
570 @twomoon: «The
broader point remains nonetheless
valid in my view: without a common forum for direct engagement with their critics, climate scientists risk continued erosion of public trust.»
The
broader point remains nonetheless
valid in my view: without a common forum for direct engagement with their critics, climate scientists risk continued erosion of public trust.
A similar tactic suggested by the 17th century French mathematician, Blaise Pascal, acknowledges
valid points made by the other person and then considers how they may fit into one's own
broader plan.